Her insolence is disturbingly funny sometimes...

__________

If they are for the 150, the sensors are the same. As long as the harness is long enough, you can shave off the connector guide at the end of the harness. The harness on the purchased O2's, not the vehicle.....then plug them in. That harness has to reach tho. Upstream O2's have a shorter harness. Downstreams have 2 sizes.

Or , you could just return them lol.

 

Yea, I didn't have a choice with the 98. I had to run rears in the front due to the long tube headers. O2 bungs are set back further to the collectors. Running rears in front solved the issue because they had a greater harness length. A little trick from the past, surprised you haven't heard of that one.

 

I know what you mean, it sucks. I had to purchase a both 98 and 99 rockers and combine them to get a full rocker panel. Then I never installed them after all that lol. Still have those things taking up space. Yea , they didn't have a full rocker replacement for 97/98, you had to combine the two.

 

Another one rolled it on Black Bear Pass CO in a Bronco. Lady and her puppy were ejected after 400'....they lived!

 

I looked them up again, and they say they'll fit. Wires aren't long enough though... probably 3 inches too short. They are the Bosch/Ford sensors. I almost spliced them, but just threw the old one back in until Saturday.

These things came right loose. I've started using a 10 inch pipe wrench to get O2's out (if I can get it in there) and it seems to work much better. Too many knuckle busters with my Lisle O2 socket.

 

Yea, I wouldn't splice O2 wires, - too sensitive to resistance changes. That's why I used downstreams for the ups when I did headers...they reached. No splicing or extenders needed. Should just get the right ones then.

And Oh yea, your lucky they came loose. The rears can be the worst. The first time I changed out the rears, they ripped apart the bung threads. Then it became a major job and a 1/2 doing them. They had 150,000 miles on them and didn't want out lol.

 

Didn't watch the video. Will watch later.
Glad they lived.
I am amazed about how good recent cars are in crashes. Lady should have had seat belt on.


90 years of the gov't regulating cars and they did diddly and squat.
Insurance industry and says enough is enough and tests cars and helps the mfgs and now cars roll down mountains and everybody lives.

 

Originally two woman and a puppy. They got so far on the trail then it began raining and sleeting. They attempted to turn around, one woman got out to guide and they said it began to tip and that was it. By the looks of the Bronco, it went end over end at some point.

I'm not sure I would have the seat belt on turning around, I rather bail if there was a chance. If she was on the high side, slim chance of bailing....I don't think you could. But 400' before ejecting.... they didn't mention total fall, or I missed it. The woman 23, was in critical condition, the puppy had a few bumps and bruises.

 

From the description of the road, it reminds me of the road that goes from Salt Lake County, over in to Tooele County. It's a huge time saver, even at a snails pace. But one false move, and you're going for a ride. I heard they've shut down the mine overlook now, due to instability. It's really hairy up in that area though. One lane is all. A lot of people are pitching for UDOT to make a tunnel through this mountain. Has to be an astronomical expense though.

 

Expensive and slow going to bore through a mountain I expect. With a little modification, Big Bertha might be able to hack thru.... -


I don't know tho, that machine is for tunneling yes, but through a mountain ? I'm not sure what they use today...high pressure water maybe, explosives. Probably a combination.