Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Thinking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2019 | 10:47 PM
  #10521  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,191
Likes: 8,621
From: Utah
Default

Funny.... I just came to post this, Brew. I just ordered all of this.... I think I can come up with something here, LOL.

Old May 9, 2019 | 10:58 PM
  #10522  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 7,630
From: MI
Default

I don't like that top one unless you drill and tap the bottom for the sensor, otherwise your asking for sensor problem. The bottom fitting looks good, but you would have to do the same. Is that what your thinking ?

The sensor bulb must remain in the stream, no pockets.

BTW- I like how the fitting in center is 45'ed. You COULD use that for the manifold tap, if you plan on using a T elsewhere in a hose for the sensor. Just a thought to ponder.

Last edited by Jbrew; May 9, 2019 at 11:04 PM.
Old May 9, 2019 | 11:17 PM
  #10523  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,191
Likes: 8,621
From: Utah
Default

The one on top is an inline tee that is tapped to 3/8 NPT already. The other two ends are for 5/8 hose. Ford actually used that setup on some of the 2.3 Fox Body's. I have one out in the shop, but it's kind of hammered. I am just getting a couple of options ready because I dont want to be waiting on stupid stuff like fittings and hoses. I got my heavy duty water pump bolt set today.... got the ARP header and head bolts too. Going to use the same grade 8 zinc coated intake bolts that I've used several times now.... but I can get those at Home Depot.
Old May 9, 2019 | 11:28 PM
  #10524  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 7,630
From: MI
Default

I know what they are, I was just pointing out what they aren't lol. Top fitting sensor bid is too far from the stream imo. If you use it and begin having sensor inconsistencies, that's why. The guy who fabricated whom you can't find new what he was doing, should mimic his thinking...as he's correct.
Old May 9, 2019 | 11:37 PM
  #10525  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 7,630
From: MI
Default

Ford did the same thing in the gen 10's that used an ECT and came up with a new fitting. They either copied the engineering from each other or just came up with on their own. Hope you realize what I'm referring too...otherwise it's a wash lol.
Old May 9, 2019 | 11:43 PM
  #10526  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,191
Likes: 8,621
From: Utah
Default

It would not be but a couple inches from the stock location.... Sensor bulb does sit in the stream.. probably 7/16 or 1/2 inch. Like I mentioned above, Ford used this exact setup on the 2.3's.
Old May 10, 2019 | 01:36 AM
  #10527  
akdoggie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,544
Likes: 2,552
From: Alaska
Default

Originally Posted by white89gt
It would not be but a couple inches from the stock location.... Sensor bulb does sit in the stream.. probably 7/16 or 1/2 inch. Like I mentioned above, Ford used this exact setup on the 2.3's.
Ford used that water line insert in a number of their 70-80's cars. I think I still have a full SFB hard tube line kit and that exact fitting in a box of GEN 8 parts. So much crap, lol

2100....my buddy is working on 2 76 highboyx right now. They are motor swapping to a 390 and trans from MT to AT. Talk about a nightmare. lol. Nothing swaps directly like you would figure it would. Changing the columns also turned out to be a problem. The coupler needs an ujoint, and the MT one does not fit the AT end. Both truck made in 76, in San Jose CA. and are 8900 off in VIN. We found the front diff to be different styles. One a D6TA and the other a D3TA. Big difference. The latter uses wiper seals, and the D6 uses hard seals.
Old May 10, 2019 | 06:26 AM
  #10528  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,191
Likes: 8,621
From: Utah
Default

Originally Posted by akdoggie
Ford used that water line insert in a number of their 70-80's cars. I think I still have a full SFB hard tube line kit and that exact fitting in a box of GEN 8 parts. So much crap, lol
I think this might be what the Lincoln Town car used as well. I've seen it mentioned that the 5.0 Town Car setup is unique and can be made to work. I guess I could mosey on over to the JY and see what I can find, lol. I'll take a picture of the factory setup, and the bulb inside the pipe later tonight.

Man... I was typing last night, and BAM.... I was out. Must be tired.
Old May 10, 2019 | 12:24 PM
  #10529  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,191
Likes: 8,621
From: Utah
Default

General Mess......

Old May 10, 2019 | 05:33 PM
  #10530  
OhioLariat's Avatar
Now an XLT in Colorado
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 3,170
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by white89gt
I need the other port on the pump for the bypass on the stat housing.

Or.... maybe I am misunderstanding your question?
I guess I didn't think about that being needed. Sounds like you're on your way to a solution.

Pull the entire nose to change a bulb??? That's surely a candidate for an LED/HID upgrade if it could be done correctly!

EDIT: Looks like you don't have to completely remove the nose, but good gawd! -- https://www.paulstravelpictures.com/...ide/index.html
//

Last edited by OhioLariat; May 10, 2019 at 05:38 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.