Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

Gotts intake modification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #171  
picaflor's Avatar
DIY
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 11
From: South Florida and NYC part time
Default

Originally Posted by jb06
I wasn't sure about the holes maybe for water to drain out not sure. Does anyone know if there's has the holes? I am just wondering if the previous owner did it or if it came from Ford like that.
They come OEM from Ford. Mine had those too. Most likely to help with water.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #172  
jb06's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Cool thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2011 | 11:56 PM
  #173  
Seth's Avatar
Sgt Shawshank
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,978
Likes: 18
From: Batesville,AR
Default

so can anyone tell me if my 07 has this silencer cause i didnt see anything just by looking at it. and what is a gryphon
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 01:22 AM
  #174  
Hogan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 462
Likes: 11
From: Canada
Default

is there a specific reason why ford never did this from the factory? they must of had a good reason for it to be sized how it was.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 01:24 AM
  #175  
BolletuH's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 859
Likes: 12
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by Hogan
is there a specific reason why ford never did this from the factory? they must of had a good reason for it to be sized how it was.
To induce more cold air and keep down engine noise.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 01:51 AM
  #176  
jb06's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

I didn't see any silencer in my intake tube today when I did my mod. 06 screw 5.4
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2011 | 09:47 PM
  #177  
Georgekoch's Avatar
Pale Rider
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

I’m new to this site and by no means an engineer or a certified mechanic. I have read the posts on this topic from front to back and believe this is something I am going to try however I have a few questions about this process that I have not seen answered.


I understand in theory that if the baffles are removed in this intake chamber and the end is opened up on the firewall side that the air intake opening will be increased by at least 1 inch which would increase the cubic feet per minute air flow capacity. Has anyone figured out the additional CFM difference between the 2 inch opening and the 3 inch modification?


This brings me to my second question, unless this additional air flow capacity is inducted it would actually be a static capacity of air flow and does it actually induce more air then the factory 2 inch opening. If you open your mouth wide and exhale you release a large volume of air but no pressure, and half of an exhale pushed through a straw would be a smaller volume of air but under intense pressure.



Since engines make more power with cool outside air than the hot ambient air found in the engine bay, it seems logical to tap high-pressure pockets to feed air to the engine similarly to cowl induction or a supercharger. I don’t know that just opening the intake up to a larger size static in nature would make a difference, unless there is an induction process through the firewall itself. Increasing the air pressure around an intake artificially crams more air into the engine than the static air could from a larger intake opening absent induction.

My last question brings me to the mass air flow sensor. This sensor is located in between the air flow to measure and send signals to the on board computer. Would it be beneficial to just make this Gott modification and let the computer reset itself in its on time verses resetting the computer upon modification? It would appear that any variance is going to pass through the sensor, regardless if you keep the intake stock, open the intake by an inch or force air through the intake. The sensor will make the measurements and adjustments in real time. I think the only way that you could fool it is to provide an intake source that circumvents the sensor.

Anyway, think I’ll give it a try, I was just wondering if anybody out here had any of these answers or questions as well.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2011 | 10:04 PM
  #178  
eej711's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 14
From: Texas
Default

I'm not an expert but I'll give a few of your questions a try.

The pressure shouldn't matter too much. The point of the modification is to replace the constraint of the 2"( it may even be smaller than that) part going into the wheel well by replacing it with a 3" tube. The throttle body and the intake tube after the filter is 3" or 3 1/2". So by increasing the diameter you reduce the constraint caused by the factory tube diameter which allows more air to get to the engine to ignite the fuel.

It goes into the wheel well because in that part of the truck under the hood the wheel well is where the coldest air is located. The aftermarket TRUE cold air intakes usually get air from behind the headlight or lower, which if you have a 5.4l engine you can have another tube go into the one that goes into the wheel well and collects air from behind the headlight as well.

Just don't have your intake collect air behind the air filter for obvious reasons.

Hope that helps, if it doesn't then well I tried
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #179  
Georgekoch's Avatar
Pale Rider
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

It helped, I was just wondering about it like Columbus, at some point you just got to do it to find out if the world is flat or round, I'm going to give it a try anyway.

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2011 | 07:48 AM
  #180  
No Thanks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
From: S.E Connecticut on L.I Sound
Default

Good discussion...

Inquiring minds want to know



.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.