Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2016 | 10:58 PM
  #8621  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,203
Likes: 8,625
From: Utah
Default

Well thanks for the knowledge. I'll put that on my to do list!
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2016 | 11:20 PM
  #8622  
DrillRig52's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 201
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by white89gt
Well thanks for the knowledge. I'll put that on my to do list!
Glad I could help!
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 03:14 AM
  #8623  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by 2thousand5.4
Yeah but I feel like it would be a way better platform to build of of than a 2v. Plus I want a screw and that's the color I want. And the hassle and expense of building the engine is already done. Plus he said the trans is slipping a little expecially when cold so maybe with a built trans it will feel a little more peppy. I'm not looking for a 600 hp Truck since it will be my daily, but I want a screw and I can't afford a 12th gen so this looks like the best option.
To be honest navigator heads leave a lot to be desired. The huge intake ports and long intake runners will make great torque and decent power. But 2v can make the same with similar costs. A new trans won't fix the pep. The problem is the torque converter. Navigators have a factory 1600-1800 stall speed. The F150 converter with a 5.4 and a 4r70 is a 1100-1200. If I keep the scab and buy a Screw for a daily I would but it depends where things are going. I will never give up my scab. I have plans but involve a diesel.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 03:35 AM
  #8624  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,203
Likes: 8,625
From: Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
I have plans but involve a diesel.
Which motor? I've seen a couple pretty sweet 4BT swaps in these.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 03:44 AM
  #8625  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by white89gt
Which motor? I've seen a couple pretty sweet 4BT swaps in these.
Either a 12v Cummins or I will make a 6.0 fit
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 07:41 AM
  #8626  
2thousand5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 105
From: Virginia
Default Engine Builders talk.

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
To be honest navigator heads leave a lot to be desired. The huge intake ports and long intake runners will make great torque and decent power. But 2v can make the same with similar costs. A new trans won't fix the pep. The problem is the torque converter. Navigators have a factory 1600-1800 stall speed. The F150 converter with a 5.4 and a 4r70 is a 1100-1200. If I keep the scab and buy a Screw for a daily I would but it depends where things are going. I will never give up my scab. I have plans but involve a diesel.
I actually was looking at torque converters last night, I was thinking about a 1600-1800 or maybe 2300-2500 stall. I probably wouldn't keep it stock. But it is going to be a daily driver. Eventually I would like to add boost but nothing crazy, probably just 10-12 pounds. I haven't looked much into rebuild kits, just briefly at the ones from monster on there website. Looks like they only make a 450 hp kit and a 600 hp kit. My goal is 450 hp or a little less but I'll probably end up going with the 600 horse power kit just to be on the safe side. I just don't want to dump the money and time into my engine when I know I'm gonna sell the truck eventually and get a screw.

Last edited by 2thousand5.4; Mar 19, 2016 at 07:56 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 07:51 AM
  #8627  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by DrillRig52
I didn't say too much about it thinking I was the only dumbass on the planet that could have that happen. You guys are making me feel LOTS better lmao
Hahaha that's what we are here for
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 07:55 AM
  #8628  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by DrillRig52
I've had mine for 2.5 years and I swear by it. It's been on gnarly jeep trails and just about everywhere else you can imagine. It's makes a WORLD of difference in the bump steer. Only cost 60 bucks. I can't tell you enough how much it improves the driving experience on these trucks.
Well I know what's happening next
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 08:51 AM
  #8629  
fordmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Either a 12v Cummins or I will make a 6.0 fit
6.4 seems less complicated, no ficm, common rail, go single turbo..way easier
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 09:04 AM
  #8630  
BrowningSCrew's Avatar
Resident light whore
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,772
Likes: 757
From: Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by fordmotorsport
6.4 seems less complicated, no ficm, common rail, go single turbo..way easier
More powers
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.