Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

The Ultimate MPG thread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 03:08 PM
  #211  
Ifallsguy's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 277
From: In way too hot southern Georgia
Default

drive like you have a raw egg between your foot and the accelerator. You are not driving a small economy car and it's really easy to put your foot into it.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 03:18 PM
  #212  
engineermike's Avatar
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 1,611
From: Gonzales, La
Default

Slow acceleration isn't going to get you better economy. Sorry. That's a common misconception.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 04:09 PM
  #213  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Slow acceleration isn't going to get you better economy. Sorry. That's a common misconception.
Yeh but flooring it everywhere you go will definitely not make it better either.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 08:55 PM
  #214  
XtraLargeTall's Avatar
Meaner than ymeski56
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 28,489
Likes: 459
From: Fort Morgan, Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by jprevat

Yeh but flooring it everywhere you go will definitely not make it better either.
It's all in how you use that power. Braking is probably the biggest loss of efficiency because you are basically converting that energy in the form of momentum into heat.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 09:26 PM
  #215  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by XtraLargeTall
It's all in how you use that power. Braking is probably the biggest loss of efficiency because you are basically converting that energy in the form of momentum into heat.
Very true. I tend to coast as much as possible.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 10:07 PM
  #216  
engineermike's Avatar
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 1,611
From: Gonzales, La
Default

Originally Posted by XtraLargeTall
It's all in how you use that power. Braking is probably the biggest loss of efficiency because you are basically converting that energy in the form of momentum into heat.
Exactly! 27000 miles of momentum conservation here. Lifetime average = 20.2.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 10:09 PM
  #217  
Alweeja's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 334
Likes: 29
From: Thomson, Georgia
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by engineermike
Slow acceleration isn't going to get you better economy. Sorry. That's a common misconception.
I am amazed that you can work the engive harder without increasing the amount of energy needed to complete the task.


Gotta call BS on that
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 10:13 PM
  #218  
engineermike's Avatar
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 1,611
From: Gonzales, La
Default

Originally Posted by Alweeja
I am amazed that you can work the engive harder without increasing the amount of energy needed to complete the task.


Gotta call BS on that
Sorry, but the theory and practice agree. You may be working the engine harder, but you do it for a shorter period of time. It takes the same amount of energy to accelerate 5500 lb to 60 mph in 10 seconds as it does to do it in 60 seconds. The main difference is that brisk acceleration can afford you more opportunity to coast if you're paying attention and planning ahead.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 10:14 PM
  #219  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Alweeja

I am amazed that you can work the engive harder without increasing the amount of energy needed to complete the task.

Gotta call BS on that
The point he was making is that a higher level of energy spent over a short period of time is comparable to a lower amount spent over a longer span of time.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #220  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike

Sorry, but the theory and practice agree. You may be working the engine harder, but you do it for a shorter period of time. It takes the same amount of energy to accelerate 5500 lb to 60 mph in 10 seconds as it does to do it in 60 seconds. The main difference is that brisk acceleration can afford you more opportunity to coast if you're paying attention and planning ahead.
However brisk acceleration does not equal floored
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.