Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 01:08 PM
  #9261  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

I'd go with the 270AH's. They work well N/A and will work well under boost.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 01:33 PM
  #9262  
2thousand5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 105
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
I'd go with the 270AH's. They work well N/A and will work well under boost.
Would I loose to much low end with those? I was originally looking at the 270s
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 02:06 PM
  #9263  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Your gonna need a stall converter. But going S/C a stall converter will be needed. around a 2k stall would be fine.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 02:24 PM
  #9264  
2thousand5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 105
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Your gonna need a stall converter. But going S/C a stall converter will be needed. around a 2k stall would be fine.
Problem is tho it's not gonna be S/C for at least a year or two after the engine and trans it built, maybe even longer than that. 1800 is a pretty high rpm, so does that mean cruising at 45 or 50 around 1500 rpm will be pretty gutless? I plan on doing about a 2200 stall
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 07:40 PM
  #9265  
2thousand5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 105
From: Virginia
Default

Part of me is starting to think it's not worth it to even port the heads when I can just put that money towards boost
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 08:22 PM
  #9266  
Wolvee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 433
Default

Look into Todd Warren custom grinds.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 10:58 PM
  #9267  
2thousand5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 105
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Wolvee
Look into Todd Warren custom grinds.
I'll look into those too. These are the heads I was thinking about http://www.modularheadshop.com/i-244...tegory:1268096. Nearly 3k just seems like to much to pay for ported heads and everything for the somewhat little gain. They also make some with there cams for 1800 for everything. There NA stage one cam only has a 108 LSA which seems like to much overlap for me. There supercharger cams have a 114 but they don't have much info on them. I'll look into Todd Warren's also tho.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2017 | 12:20 AM
  #9268  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

108 is ideal for NA setup. I have SHM customs with a 109/110. I have split cams currently. Boosted applications are different. I have Fox Lake Ported 2v heads. I only did it because NA was still cheaper than trying to acquire all the Lightning parts to go boosted.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2017 | 07:23 AM
  #9269  
2thousand5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 105
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
108 is ideal for NA setup. I have SHM customs with a 109/110. I have split cams currently. Boosted applications are different. I have Fox Lake Ported 2v heads. I only did it because NA was still cheaper than trying to acquire all the Lightning parts to go boosted.
So finding a cam that will be decent both NA and boosted isn't going to happen? How much power are you putting out?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2017 | 12:55 PM
  #9270  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,538
Likes: 7,640
From: MI
Default

Hey guys, been looking at used diesels. Started with the 6.7 but man, that can turn out to be a huge mistake in the long run. If I'm understanding this correctly, the best Powerstroke investment would be a 6.0, then have bullet proofed. A 6.0 bulletproofed will go the distance, the 2005-2007 models. It's either that or a 6.2 gaser. The 6.2 gaser would be enough performance wise but a bullet proofed 6.0 diesel smashes the 6two in economy. I mean it's a huge difference and I want to use it for a daily driver. But yea, the 6.0 would need at least a stage two bulletproofing.

I just started looking into it, am I understanding this correctly ? The 6.0 really? Figured some of you guys might know a thing or two.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.