Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #3771  
Wolvee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 433
Default

pfft, rockers. lol
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 01:15 PM
  #3772  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

[MENTION=99933]Franchi Motorsports[/MENTION] I need to go ahead and order this. Can I order it from you? I think this is the largest one offered through SCT.

http://www.sctflash.com/products.php?PID=40
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 01:34 PM
  #3773  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
[MENTION=99933]Franchi Motorsports[/MENTION] I need to go ahead and order this. Can I order it from you? I think this is the largest one offered through SCT.

http://www.sctflash.com/products.php?PID=40
Go stand alone with a MAP sensor. Easier tuning, along with better drivability
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 01:44 PM
  #3774  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Go stand alone with a MAP sensor. Easier tuning, along with better drivability
Easier to tune but I don't think they are as accurate. Don't wanna hurt my mileage anymore than it's already gonna be.

Plus once the charger is installed I won't have anywhere to put the map besides drilling into the turkey pan.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 02:21 PM
  #3775  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
Easier to tune but I don't think they are as accurate. Don't wanna hurt my mileage anymore than it's already gonna be.

Plus once the charger is installed I won't have anywhere to put the map besides drilling into the turkey pan.
I dont think your gonna need the charger at all.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 02:30 PM
  #3776  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
I dont think your gonna need the charger at all.
I just hope I get quick spool up. I don't want those 2800 stall's like everyone on LR is running and dragging with.

Debating on a 3.5" or 4" to the throttle body.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 02:37 PM
  #3777  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Smaller cold side will increase intake velocity at low rpm.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 07:06 PM
  #3778  
fordmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
Easier to tune but I don't think they are as accurate. Don't wanna hurt my mileage anymore than it's already gonna be. Plus once the charger is installed I won't have anywhere to put the map besides drilling into the turkey pan.
Ugh, I think your mpg went out the window a few hundred hp ago!?

Last edited by fordmotorsport; Sep 19, 2014 at 07:51 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2014 | 09:53 AM
  #3779  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

My friend asked if I could rig up a turbo on mine. His buddy pulled parts off his rolled dmax and is selling the 66mm turbo and intercooler and all the piping he could get off at 3 in the morning. $350
No thanks, "I" couldn't but know someone who probably could
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2014 | 10:02 AM
  #3780  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Its a VGT turbo too... Harder to work with.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.