Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

The Ultimate MPG thread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2018 | 06:34 PM
  #1051  
Feathermerchant's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 408
From: Euless, Tx
Default

As a point of reference, I have driven all over the US. Mountains, plains, high altitude, sea level....
The MPG on the dash is consistently about 1 MPG more than calculated. The gallons used is consistently about one gallon less than what I put in to fill up.
So the readings for me are repeatable but not completely accurate.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2018 | 07:04 PM
  #1052  
clintm6's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 767
Likes: 385
From: St. Helens, Oregon
Default

Just put in a new set of Motorcraft Platinums (old ones had 60k), and first full tank after that returned 19.3 mpg. About 90% highway, but not too bad on a 23 year old truck!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2018 | 07:25 PM
  #1053  
AeroCare's Avatar
Member
Veteran: Air Force
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 83
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by clintm6
Just put in a new set of Motorcraft Platinums (old ones had 60k), and first full tank after that returned 19.3 mpg. About 90% highway, but not too bad on a 23 year old truck!
Was changing the spark plugs good? Don't know until you tell us the MPG from the last tank before you changed them.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2018 | 07:45 PM
  #1054  
clintm6's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 767
Likes: 385
From: St. Helens, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by AeroCare
Was changing the spark plugs good? Don't know until you tell us the MPG from the last tank before you changed them.
Tank before was just under 19 mpg, so it helped a bit. I usually average between 17-19, so going above 19 is a plus! Still haven't made it over 20 though...
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2018 | 03:38 PM
  #1055  
rachunter's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 99
Likes: 36
From: West Virginia
Default

Average between 16-19 2016 F150 supercab XLT
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2018 | 12:09 AM
  #1056  
Jean-Claude Van Damm's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 2
Default

I have a 2010 F150 xlt 4x4 4.6l with 355 ls. I just bought it with 90,000km (56,000 miles) and I'm only getting 11mpg 😩 I've had it serviced, no codes, everything is running fine according to Midas. What the hell? Not sure if it makes a difference, but I live on the west coast of Canada. Currently winter at the moment. But still 11mpg??? The sticker claims 18-21mpg. I've been driving like an 80 year old too and it has made no difference. Any suggestions?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 12:26 PM
  #1057  
Irishboy62's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default K&N Air filters worth it

I have a 2016 F150 4x4 SuperCrew with the Ecoboost engine. Just wondering if installing a K&N Air Filter is worth it? I have it in my Acura, but have not noticed any increase in fuel economy. Anyone have any good experience with the K&N air filter?
Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 04:26 PM
  #1058  
Jean-Claude Van Damm's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Irishboy62
I have a 2016 F150 4x4 SuperCrew with the Ecoboost engine. Just wondering if installing a K&N Air Filter is worth it? I have it in my Acura, but have not noticed any increase in fuel economy. Anyone have any good experience with the K&N air filter?
Thanks
From what I hear, Stick with the paper filter. K&N filters restrict the flow of air and also have the potential to get oil on the MAF sensor which can really screw things up. Another thing is that paper will catch wayyy more contaminants. Stick with paper, there will be no difference if any will be with the K&N restricting flow!
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 04:48 PM
  #1059  
AeroCare's Avatar
Member
Veteran: Air Force
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 83
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Irishboy62
I have a 2016 F150 4x4 SuperCrew with the Ecoboost engine. Just wondering if installing a K&N Air Filter is worth it? I have it in my Acura, but have not noticed any increase in fuel economy. Anyone have any good experience with the K&N air filter?
Thanks
Here's my take on that. Ford engineers have spent tons of hours making our trucks fuel efficient so I'm sure that if they thought that a foam filter would get them 1mpg more they would find another place to save the extra $0.10 and give us foam filters.

My second thought is some people swear that by installing a bed cover and a $500 tuner chip it'll gives you better mileage. I know it's a human thing to defend something you just paid $500 even if it really didn't do anything because you don't want to look bad so I think that's why nobody will admit if it doesn't work but even if it did save you some fuel how much fuel do you need to save to pay for that $500 tuner?

Just my ramblings.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 07:22 PM
  #1060  
Irishboy62's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by Jean-Claude Van Damm
From what I hear, Stick with the paper filter. K&N filters restrict the flow of air and also have the potential to get oil on the MAF sensor which can really screw things up. Another thing is that paper will catch wayyy more contaminants. Stick with paper, there will be no difference if any will be with the K&N restricting flow!
Thank you for the feedback. Makes sense!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.