Topic Sponsor
2021+ Ford F150 Discussion of the 14th generation F150.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

F150 Lightning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 08:32 AM
  #851  
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
Ford Truck Lover
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 754
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by 7cbreeze
Well the answer is simple as to why these states have those wind farms......Government subsidy, and tax credits. a corrupt political class knows no party,,After the disaster in Texas that state is really looking into more conventional power systems.
The numbers needed to grow the Grid will not be done with the current technology ,,
And there is also the fact that those states have vast stretches of open land. A requirement for both wind and solar.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 10:32 AM
  #852  
bisonp's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 467
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by 7cbreeze
Well the answer is simple as to why these states have those wind farms......Government subsidy, and tax credits. a corrupt political class knows no party,,After the disaster in Texas that state is really looking into more conventional power systems.
The numbers needed to grow the Grid will not be done with the current technology ,,
Wind farms are becoming a blight upon the land. How any true environmentalist can't see that is beyond me, I guess they probably never leave the city.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 10:37 AM
  #853  
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
Ford Truck Lover
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 754
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by bisonp
Wind farms are becoming a blight upon the land. How any true environmentalist can't see that is beyond me, I guess they probably never leave the city.
Amen....though I would argue that solar farms are even worse! At least under the windmills the land is still usable.

P.S. Of course, we are just cavemen that are behind the times! ROFL

P.P.S. I would also argue that cities are an even bigger blight upon the land! But environmentalists love them................

Last edited by LoneWolfTrucker; Jun 8, 2021 at 10:39 AM.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 10:46 AM
  #854  
bisonp's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 467
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by LoneWolfTrucker
Amen....though I would argue that solar farms are even worse! At least under the windmills the land is still usable.

P.S. Of course, we are just cavemen that are behind the times! ROFL

P.P.S. I would also argue that cities are an even bigger blight upon the land! But environmentalists love them................
Yeah. Unusable land or something that can be seen for miles? I have seen so many complain about oil derricks spoiling natural beauty but those same people are OK with wind farms.

There are no easy answers, I suppose. I'd like to see more nuclear but that is also certainly not without some risk. China is bringing a new nuclear plant online every 2-3 months. That's the kind of aggressive buildout we need to be doing right now.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 10:53 AM
  #855  
dave-p's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 312
Likes: 204
From: Ontario , Canada
Default

Well I am excited to see the New Lightning, may well just trade in my F150 next year if there are any available at the dealer.

My only concern at this point is planning the occasional long drive and the availability of the fast charging stations here in Canada.

but for 99.9% of what I do this EV would do just fine
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 10:55 AM
  #856  
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
Ford Truck Lover
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 754
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by bisonp
Yeah. Unusable land or something that can be seen for miles? I have seen so many complain about oil derricks spoiling natural beauty but those same people are OK with wind farms.

There are no easy answers, I suppose. I'd like to see more nuclear but that is also certainly not without some risk. China is bringing a new nuclear plant online every 2-3 months. That's the kind of aggressive buildout we need to be doing right now.
Yep, I brought up nuclear a few pages back and of course the "wind and solar" crowd collectively had a skull explosion.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 11:01 AM
  #857  
7cbreeze's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 248
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by [F2C]MaDMaXX
The problems they had were absolutely nothing to do with the solutions they generate power from.
It's an isolated mishmash of a system with little to no coordination and everyman for themselves.


This is a very enlightening video for the technical among you.

https://youtu.be/08mwXICY4JM
What is not told is notice the coal production,,,, not much , look at the production in coal 15 year ago.. Texas had to get rid of their Coal plants get green credits with wind and solar and try to balance the load with NG plants... Big mistake.. Texas is used to being very warm , heck the majority of their housing lacks insulation specs like the more northern states , was no need for it,, also the NG is not uniform ...many states use NG underground HP lines where the gas is not exposed to various temp changes,,Why did texas even have to ask the Super Smart EPA to allow them to exceed their exhaust emissions ,, HMMM.. The Federal system required them and others to shut down plants { Coal } because of emissions standards.. the 1990 had a clean standard,except for co2.. Oh by the way look at the solar system, the amount of Silver each panel uses,, we dont have enough silver including melting down grandmas silverware to meet the production needs.. Would be nice if we had developed a better battery for a power wall , some day maybe.. T
the overall piece was good , most people just turn on a switch not understanding the balance of power needed for grid . the load balance is a modern marvel in its own right..
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 11:21 AM
  #858  
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
Ford Truck Lover
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 754
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by 7cbreeze
What is not told is notice the coal production,,,, not much , look at the production in coal 15 year ago.. Texas had to get rid of their Coal plants get green credits with wind and solar and try to balance the load with NG plants... Big mistake.. Texas is used to being very warm , heck the majority of their housing lacks insulation specs like the more northern states , was no need for it,, also the NG is not uniform ...many states use NG underground HP lines where the gas is not exposed to various temp changes,,Why did texas even have to ask the Super Smart EPA to allow them to exceed their exhaust emissions ,, HMMM.. The Federal system required them and others to shut down plants { Coal } because of emissions standards.. the 1990 had a clean standard,except for co2.. Oh by the way look at the solar system, the amount of Silver each panel uses,, we dont have enough silver including melting down grandmas silverware to meet the production needs.. Would be nice if we had developed a better battery for a power wall , some day maybe.. T
the overall piece was good , most people just turn on a switch not understanding the balance of power needed for grid . the load balance is a modern marvel in its own right..
I am not sure I agree with TX on insulation. Insulation helps with cooling as much as heating.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 03:25 PM
  #859  
Bob Reynolds's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
From: Huntsville, Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by All Hat No Cattle
I get no enjoyment correcting the lack of knowledge, misstating of facts, alternate facts, and just plain lying. I see a statement like the one above, and just go OMG!

Of course, these people have absolutely no proof of their theories, because they don't post them.

This purpose of this thread is to discuss the new Ford Lightning BEV. Should a responsible forum member just say "Oh well" when they see people being mislead by lies? We call out crooked dealers, parts suppliers that don't deliver, and many other subjects that are not good for forum members. But lies put out by people spreading propaganda for the oil companies are sacred? Why do they love the oil companies so much?

For instance, if solar and wind are not economically viable, as stated above, why does the state of Texas, and these other states, have so many windmills generating electricity? Is Texas being run by Liberals? Why are they spending money on uneconomical windmills?

Notice anything? Are 4 out of 5 states with the most windmills RED states? How come?



And then we go to solar. What are those commies in Texas up to? Don't they know that solar collectors to generate electricity don't work and are too expensive? Apparently not.





Oops, 3 out of 4 in the top 4, are RED states. WTF are they doing, building those damn solar plants. "Forcing their adoption for idealogical reasons will lower our standard of living", says the guy above.

So you people in those RED states above take note. Your state government elected officials are looking to lower your standard of living. Why???

Let's put this thread back on topic. As long as no one posts provably wrong stuff about America's electrical grid, I won't have to correct them. I love it!

But wake up and smell the coffee, people, BEV's are coming, and if we, the USA, don't keep up, the Chinese will be glad to fill in for us around the world.
I am a person expressing a different opinion than you, not a liar spreading propaganda for the oil companies, a ridiculous assertion.

In their current state of development EVs are practical as commuter vehicles but not for touring and the reasons are well understood. Range and charging times are problems that will yield only to breakthroughs in battery technology and to massive investments in charging infrastructure. That said, EVs are definitely an important and growing part of the automobile business, growth partly enabled by government subsidies and consumer rebates without which they would not have developed as fast or at all. Nonetheless, the technologies are impressive and EVs appear viable for commuter use.

Power generation is another subject altogether. Obviously wind and solar work better where the wind blows and the sun shines but both technologies remain limited by the realities of cost, intermittency and scalability, not to mention environmental concerns, and they too exist largely because of government subsidies and incentives. Whether they really make sense in many locations given their high cost and generally small contribution to the overall demand is a matter of opinion. For now we are dependent upon fossil fuels, hydro and nuclear and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future.

Last edited by Bob Reynolds; Jun 9, 2021 at 02:08 PM.
Old Jun 8, 2021 | 05:25 PM
  #860  
All Hat No Cattle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 1,001
From: Lost Wages
Default

This leads to the false premises made by EV advocates: the cost of renewables is decreasing. Without getting into the weeds, A recent NREL article came across my desk several weeks ago. If you don’t know, NREL is our leading technology development thinktank and appears to be relatively unpolluted by partisan demagoguery that impairs most .federal functions. A must read for all sides. The key points are: 1) As the percentage of electric power generated by renewables increase, the cost of adding renewables increases; and 2) Technology needed to reach full renewable power supply does not exist. More simply stated we are putting all our eggs in one basket today, in the face of causing increased costs and in search of unattainable goals.
Ummm, the NREL website is an excellent source for finding out facts about solar collectors. I'm not sure why anti-solar people would recommend it, but thank you anyway.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is transforming energy through research, development, commercialization, and deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies.

Partner with us to accelerate the transition of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies to the marketplace
For example, here is a recent study the NREL just did. Notice the bottom 2 entries about costs for utility grade PV systems, including storage. See where that is going?

https://www.nrel.gov/about/mission-programs.html

They are at the forefront of developing new renewable energy strategies . Browse their website to see what is really going on with solar and wind energy.




As for the guy that wanted to know the life span of a PV collector:

How long can a solar panel last?

about 25 to 30 years
But the solar panels generating that power don't last forever. The industry standard life span is about 25 to 30 years, and that means that some panels installed at the early end of the current boom aren't long from being retired.May 11, 2018
But remember this. In that 25 year span, the utilities did not spend a single penny for the energy that they are converting into electricity. Not a penny, unless someone figures out how to meter sunlight, and meter wind.

No money spent buying natural gas, no money spent buying coal, no money spent buying oil. And that is why the utilities are going into solar and wind, big time.

It is as if you just bought a new home backup generator, and included in the price is free fuel for 25 years. Is that a great deal?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.