Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Traitor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2020 | 09:55 PM
  #51  
Flamingtaco's Avatar
5 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
5 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 9,098
Likes: 3,211
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by dalola
In all fairness, for a 4cyl NA engine of that era, those were impressive figures. It's actually still pretty impressive in today's engine world. Everyone else needs FI to get similar HP/L.
I take it you mean direct injection rather than fuel injection.

Originally Posted by RL1990
Honda got 123hp/liter out of a NATRUALLY ASPIRATED engine, Ford is using 2 turbochargers. Say what you want but getting that power out of an engine without forced induction, have a 8,900 rpm redline and the reliability of a Accord is impressive. Even 20 years later very few engines can match it's power output, including hypercars.
I think what you're missing about Fords is getting 148lb-ft/L of torque (2.7) is impressive in a vehicle priced for the masses and intended as a daily driver. It's even more impressive because it's done with hot turbo air and doesn't detonate.

While the F20 and 22 were good engines, their 'impressive' hp figures were achieved by being built to rev. In 2000, Ford was putting a 2.0L 4-cyl into the Focus that was producing just 8% less torque, without VTC. But these aren't really comparable because the S2000 cost three times as much as the Focus. Hell, it cost more than a Mustang Cobra, which was a second faster in the 1/4. The Focus ZX3, which got VTC in 2002 or 2003, had 145lb-ft and cost, I think, 40% as much.

The S2000 isn't a holy grail vehicle that proves Honda is superior, it was a lot of money thrown at performance, which developed a motor than absolutely would not work for our trucks (making this an odd comparison). Right now, if Honda wanted to put a 2.7L in a full size truck, they'd have to use turbos to get the needed torque at a useable rpm. If they were to do a 2.7L like they did in the S2000, they'd have 3.3L performance at 3.5eco cost, and a truck that sucks for daily driving.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2020 | 09:59 PM
  #52  
RL1990's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 3,263
Likes: 1,177
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
150 lbs of torque
What's your point?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2020 | 10:18 PM
  #53  
blkZ28spt's Avatar
Senior Member
Supporting Member

5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 8,731
Likes: 4,800
Default

Originally Posted by RL1990
What's your point?
Weak.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2020 | 10:36 PM
  #54  
RL1990's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 3,263
Likes: 1,177
Default

Originally Posted by Flamingtaco
I take it you mean direct injection rather than fuel injection.



I think what you're missing about Fords is getting 148lb-ft/L of torque (2.7) is impressive in a vehicle priced for the masses and intended as a daily driver. It's even more impressive because it's done with hot turbo air and doesn't detonate.

While the F20 and 22 were good engines, their 'impressive' hp figures were achieved by being built to rev. In 2000, Ford was putting a 2.0L 4-cyl into the Focus that was producing just 8% less torque, without VTC. But these aren't really comparable because the S2000 cost three times as much as the Focus. Hell, it cost more than a Mustang Cobra, which was a second faster in the 1/4. The Focus ZX3, which got VTC in 2002 or 2003, had 145lb-ft and cost, I think, 40% as much.

The S2000 isn't a holy grail vehicle that proves Honda is superior, it was a lot of money thrown at performance, which developed a motor than absolutely would not work for our trucks (making this an odd comparison). Right now, if Honda wanted to put a 2.7L in a full size truck, they'd have to use turbos to get the needed torque at a useable rpm. If they were to do a 2.7L like they did in the S2000, they'd have 3.3L performance at 3.5eco cost, and a truck that sucks for daily driving.
I never implied the F20 engine was appropriate for a truck; it's a high performance engine specifically designed for a sports car. Don't be such a Ford fanboy that you are unable to give credit to where it's due. Honda engineered an amazing engine that can still hold it's own 20 years later. BTW the F20 is engineered strong enough that you can turbocharge it to 500hp with no modifications to it's internals to handle the power increase.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2020 | 01:16 AM
  #55  
Frosty78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 71
Likes: 32
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Flamingtaco
I take it you mean direct injection rather than fuel injection.


FI Forced Induction
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2020 | 01:40 AM
  #56  
dagooaz's Avatar
The Hammer
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 487
Likes: 309
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Y'all are funny. You take it so personal when somebody jumps ship to Chevy, Dodge, or Toyota. Who really cares? If he wants to spend his money on a Ram truck, it's his money, it doesn't affect you in any way. Quit attacking folks because they think differently then you do. He's entitled to his opinion and allowed to spend his money on whatever he sits fit, even it he is misguided in most of our eyes. I know it's hard to believe, but some people have had real problems with their Ford truck. Every manufacturer makes something bad eventually, it doesn't mean the brand is bad. It also doesn't mean he's questioning your sanity. Let be.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2020 | 07:15 AM
  #57  
SSellers's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 1,089
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by dagooaz
Y'all are funny. You take it so personal when somebody jumps ship to Chevy, Dodge, or Toyota. Who really cares? If he wants to spend his money on a Ram truck, it's his money, it doesn't affect you in any way. Quit attacking folks because they think differently then you do. He's entitled to his opinion and allowed to spend his money on whatever he sits fit, even it he is misguided in most of our eyes. I know it's hard to believe, but some people have had real problems with their Ford truck. Every manufacturer makes something bad eventually, it doesn't mean the brand is bad. It also doesn't mean he's questioning your sanity. Let be.
Hey, what harm could come from wanting to create a world where everyone looks the same and thinks the same???
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2020 | 08:24 AM
  #58  
dalola's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 1,599
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by SSellers
Hey, what harm could come from wanting to create a world where everyone looks the same and thinks the same???
Seemed to work well in the twentieth century...
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2020 | 09:21 AM
  #59  
rckt's Avatar
USMC Veteran
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 317
Likes: 96
From: Florida
Default

RAM has a decent interior, but couldn't pull the trigger on a FIAT. My 1st choice was Toyota, then Ford. I decided on the Ford bc of perfect balance of reliability vs capabilities. Toyota is real old school. FIAT's spend too much time in the shop, just try to find owners with 100k miles.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2020 | 09:37 AM
  #60  
montanaman's Avatar
FORD lifer
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 256
From: The Quad Cities - relocated from Montana
Default

Originally Posted by dagooaz
Y'all are funny. You take it so personal when somebody jumps ship to Chevy, Dodge, or Toyota. Who really cares? If he wants to spend his money on a Ram truck, it's his money, it doesn't affect you in any way. Quit attacking folks because they think differently then you do. He's entitled to his opinion and allowed to spend his money on whatever he sits fit, even it he is misguided in most of our eyes. I know it's hard to believe, but some people have had real problems with their Ford truck. Every manufacturer makes something bad eventually, it doesn't mean the brand is bad. It also doesn't mean he's questioning your sanity. Let be.
Have you noticed that this is a Ford F-150 forum?

Nothing to do with karate, Rachael Ray recipes, or FIATS.

Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.