Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Thinking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 09:00 PM
  #26931  
OhioLariat's Avatar
Now an XLT in Colorado
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 3,171
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeybizness
. The lean codes could be anything tbh...vacuum leaks, fuel side issues with leaking injectors or a weak pump, a manifold leak, exhaust leak, etc.

I'm likely changing mine out when the weather warms up a little...junkyard hunting a manifold so I can really invest some time in porting/polishing.

Are the throttle bodies the same for 4.6/5.4? Wondering if a bbk is in my trucks future...assuming I'd have to get the upgraded MAF with it, and a 4" pipe, right? Read somewhere you could upgrade them without needing a tune.
I know I probably should change the sensors anyway, but think I'll wait and see if the code goes away with the new intake and gaskets (and injectors, plugs, etc.) if so, I'll also wait until it's warmer to do so.

Unless you're going forced-induction or doing something else radical, you'll likely never out-flow the stock TB or peg the MAF.

Old Jan 31, 2023 | 09:00 PM
  #26932  
COStruck's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 1,199
From: The People's Republic of Colorado
Default

Could anyone use a set of Bosch front rotors used just 5kmi?
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 09:12 PM
  #26933  
Monkeybizness's Avatar
Troublemaker
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 492
Likes: 117
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by OhioLariat
I know I probably should change the sensors anyway, but think I'll wait and see if the code goes away with the new intake and gaskets (and injectors, plugs, etc.) if so, I'll also wait until it's warmer to do so.

Unless you're going forced-induction or doing something else radical, you'll likely never out-flow the stock TB or peg the MAF.
Doesn't a large throttle body, by definition, outflow a smaller one?

When I had my 87 300ZX Turbo, I swapped in a larger throttle body from a Nissan Stanza (240sx has same TB) and it definitely made a difference. Went from 54mm to 60mm and dyno gain was 14 rwhp with stock fuel maps @12psi boost. While that gain was tied to other upgrades surrounding the tb, the actual power came from the higher flow through it.

Not sure if I'd go forced induction, but with a rebuilt engine I might spice up the cams and use higher compression pistons...having the infrastructure in place for that might be a good thing.


Last edited by Monkeybizness; Jan 31, 2023 at 09:16 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 09:23 PM
  #26934  
COStruck's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 1,199
From: The People's Republic of Colorado
Default

No, the CID determines max flow, so beyond a certain point, larger TBs just slow the airflow.

FI changes that because now max flow is limited only by whether your bottom end can stay together.
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 09:43 PM
  #26935  
OhioLariat's Avatar
Now an XLT in Colorado
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 3,171
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeybizness
Doesn't a large throttle body, by definition, outflow a smaller one?.
It has the *capacity* to flow more air, but increasing its size will only help if the original one is posing a restriction to airflow. You need to look at the entire intake tract/engine/exhaust as a system. If the stock TB (and MAF) are capable of flowing the amount of air being sucked in by the engine, then making them bigger will only slow the intake air velocity and potentially introduce drivability problems like surging and twitchy throttle response.

Originally Posted by Monkeybizness
When I had my 87 300ZX Turbo, I swapped in a larger throttle body from a Nissan Stanza (240sx has same TB) and it definitely made a difference. Went from 54mm to 60mm and dyno gain was 14 rwhp with stock fuel maps @12psi boost. While that gain was tied to other upgrades surrounding the tb, the actual power came from the higher flow through it. .
Boosted applications can respond better to improvements in intake airflow because the turbo (or supercharger) is trying to cram air into the engine, so removing restriction might prove beneficial. It's also possible (actually probable) that if the slightly larger TB helped, it was *in conjunction with* the "other modifications."

Originally Posted by Monkeybizness
Not sure if I'd go forced induction, but with a rebuilt engine I might spice up the cams and use higher compression pistons...having the infrastructure in place for that might be a good thing.
As noted above, bigger is not necessarily better. MAF, TB, Intake tract, intake, heads, cams, exhaust... all components should be selected in proper combination so they match the performance needs of the system. I would suggest making your engine mods, then checking to see if the TB (or MAF, or intake tube, etc.) is, in fact, a restriction before throwing money where it doesn't provide benefit.

Last edited by OhioLariat; Jan 31, 2023 at 10:34 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 09:45 PM
  #26936  
OhioLariat's Avatar
Now an XLT in Colorado
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 3,171
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by COStruck
No, the CID determines max flow, so beyond a certain point, larger TBs just slow the airflow.

FI changes that because now max flow is limited only by whether your bottom end can stay together.
Truth.


Old Jan 31, 2023 | 10:39 PM
  #26937  
Monkeybizness's Avatar
Troublemaker
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 492
Likes: 117
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by COStruck
No, the CID determines max flow, so beyond a certain point, larger TBs just slow the airflow.

FI changes that because now max flow is limited only by whether your bottom end can stay together.
Isn't that all a factor of volumetric efficiency? After all, the have 1.8l cars pushing 2,000hp often at the drag strips...yes your internals have to be up to it but you have to have the flow to get there.

Suck, squeeze, bang, blow...the easier you make it to do those four tasks, the more power you have in the giant air pump we call an internal combustion engine...turbos and superchargers increase the amount of air being pulled through, as does higher compression pistons, that's the direct force being applied. You have things like ram air systems which help, but the fundamental issue is allowing the system to breathe easier. removing restrictions does that.

The throttle body is one of the few places where you can actually gain in available power without sacrificing overall gas mileage, simply because it is a metering device that regulates how much air is allowed into the system. As they often say, the best determination for gas mileage is how much lead is in your foot.

Larger throttle bodies only slow the airflow when the rest of the system is unable to supply it, such as when your maf and intake plumbing is of a smaller diameter than your TB or the source of oxygen rich air is not sufficient to supply the system because it's limited by air sources. Solving those issues, you have exhaust limitations on the other side of the pump(aka combustion chamber), and the most relevant limitations to this discussion, the stock fuel maps, which I've read support up to and just over 300hp (although I'm more concerned with maf/pcm compatibility in this case).

When the throttle plate opens it doesn't go from closed to full open instantly, and as a result, a larger TB and a smaller TB can flow the same amount of air at incremental levels and generally do...to a certain point.

The difference between is that the larger tb has more air available at wide open throttle and a certain percentage approaching it, but otherwise has no marked difference at lower levels, such as occurs during general stop and go driving or cruising at highway speeds. In other words, unless you're stomping on the gas, it should be similar to the smaller throttle body in performance, except that it takes less pedal work to achieve the same power results, much like the gotts zip tie mod, except with the throttle plate and not the throttle cable. The differences would only be truly seen at about 80% throttle or above...

Long story short, Ohio's right in that you wouldn't see maximum benefit without either forced induction or an increase in compression, but that doesn't mean that you wouldn't see some improvements.

I didn't do a half @$$ed port and polish on my tb elbow and upper manifold because I expected a ton of power right now, but it's something that will matter later on a new block with more going for it, and it does help flow to do so, even if it's not going to jiggle any needles in its current state...

​​​​​​To me, my truck is half show half go...fun to tinker with but I limit my projects to a weekend hobby because it occasionally, to quote Jack Reacher, hauls more than a keg of beer from time to time. Still haven't cleaned the mud off my floor mats because winter just cakes more on...

I like the idea of better looking with more power, but I'm not gonna strap on a big gaudy supercharger and a six inch lift to turn it into what, where I came from, we called the "Mendocino County Limos". (Anyone know what that refers to?)

Plan to get a replacement block and tranny with some nice internals, mild 2" lift and decent rims to go with the bushwackers I have yet to put on. Finish out the rustproofing when the weather clears up, and then paint it black (would love a matte black, but from what I have seen on other trucks it scratches too easily and is too hard to fix, so gloss black it is). All this, of course, is after the mortgage is locked in.

Got it with a clean frame but gaping holes in the rockers and bed corners...a little cutting and welding later and they look like factory with very little Bondo. Cleaned up the engine peripherals (sensors, valves, etc) , and just finished the fuel pump to round out an overhaul of the fuel system. Doing lighting upgrades and installed new speakers and android head unit.

This is my keeper truck because I'm not really impressed with most of the newer model trucks with regards to styling, reliability, and definitely not at the ridiculous prices they're being advertised at these days. A truck shouldn't cost more than a home after all, and some of them do, both to buy, and to fix.

​​​​​​




Last edited by Monkeybizness; Jan 31, 2023 at 10:42 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 10:53 PM
  #26938  
Monkeybizness's Avatar
Troublemaker
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 492
Likes: 117
From: VA
Default

Thanks, Ohio...you pretty much covered all the bases with that response...should have looked before posting.
Old Feb 1, 2023 | 07:10 AM
  #26939  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,192
Likes: 8,622
From: Utah
Default

Oh damn... I applied here recently.

https://kutv.com/news/local/northrup...aZp_xlhRv7wYfM

Old Feb 1, 2023 | 08:51 AM
  #26940  
OhioLariat's Avatar
Now an XLT in Colorado
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 3,171
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by white89gt
Oh damn... I applied here recently.

https://kutv.com/news/local/northrup...aZp_xlhRv7wYfM
That's terrible, White! What's probably worse, though, is that my mind immediately went to "workplace shooting." What a world we live in today.




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.