Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 05:28 PM
  #4481  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
As in a second IAT?
Yeah. For charge temps
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #4482  
charliedyal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 144
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328

Yeah. For charge temps
Todd suggested to move the IAT1 to the IAT2 location. Just notify the tuner of the change. How would you wire up a 2nd one without a L harness? Tap into the bulkhead?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:34 PM
  #4483  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by charliedyal
Todd suggested to move the IAT1 to the IAT2 location. Just notify the tuner of the change. How would you wire up a 2nd one without a L harness? Tap into the bulkhead?
It runs in parallel with your maf. I'm using a pig tail for a sct 5000. So it runs directly to iat2. Just monitor it by tunner or gauge. Pretty simple. Works off resistance
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:41 PM
  #4484  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
It runs in parallel with your maf. I'm using a pig tail for a sct 5000. So it runs directly to iat2. Just monitor it by tunner or gauge. Pretty simple. Works off resistance
Excuse me for that. It runs off the same harness as the maf on the lighting (connects to the harness attached to the driver side fender well)
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 12:17 AM
  #4485  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

http://stlouis.craigslist.org/cto/4699756812.html

Wow. So many little things wrong but still awesome
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 12:18 AM
  #4486  
bobkyle2's Avatar
Meaner than Ymeski
Supporting Member

15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 23,811
Likes: 828
Default

Originally Posted by jferg92
http://stlouis.craigslist.org/cto/4699756812.html

Wow. So many little things wrong but still awesome
My buddy was thinking about going and looking at that last week lol
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 12:20 AM
  #4487  
bobkyle2's Avatar
Meaner than Ymeski
Supporting Member

15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 23,811
Likes: 828
Default

Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 12:24 AM
  #4488  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by bobkyle2
My buddy was thinking about going and looking at that last week lol
You think that monster turbo doesn't light up well with the low rpm v10 triton?
That's why the ad says, runs but needs dyno tuned-probably because he can't find anyone to tune that monstrosity
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 08:14 AM
  #4489  
fordmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by jferg92
You think that monster turbo doesn't light up well with the low rpm v10 triton?
That's why the ad says, runs but needs dyno tuned-probably because he can't find anyone to tune that monstrosity
Cool but looks like someones headache trying to be passed on..He'd probably have it sold quicker by sticking with a 5.4..Also Im going to look at that guys 04...just look lol
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 08:24 AM
  #4490  
jprevat's Avatar
Resident Forester
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 13,940
Likes: 1,531
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by fordmotorsport

Cool but looks like someones headache trying to be passed on..He'd probably have it sold quicker by sticking with a 5.4..Also Im going to look at that guys 04...just look lol
It does look to be a pretty cool headache but I think a coyote swap would be less painful.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.