Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

egde evo programmer settings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 11:39 AM
  #331  
MGD's Avatar
MGD
former member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 857
Default

Originally Posted by CHUMCHAL72
I've had the 87 custom tune for quite a while now. I still feel like it has more punch with a adjusted canned 93 tune vs the 87 custom tune.
Butt-dyno? Not the way to evaluate tuning.

Best way is to get yer tuning adjusted by PHP.

Tuning is complex - cavalierly adjusting settings without knowing the whole calibration's interactions is just not recommended.

MGD
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 12:31 PM
  #332  
08silverbullet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 78
From: Pearland, TX
Default

Mine has a little bit of a rough idle so I'm kinda nervous to load in my custom tune just yet. MGD do you think maybe it's the CAI causing this? It wasn't doing this before I returned the truck to stock from my canned tune after I cleaned my MAF sensor and throttle body and threw a p061f code
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 01:09 PM
  #333  
CHUMCHAL72's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 611
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by MGD

Butt-dyno? Not the way to evaluate tuning.

Best way is to get yer tuning adjusted by PHP.

Tuning is complex - cavalierly adjusting settings without knowing the whole calibration's interactions is just not recommended.

MGD
I have my 87 custom tune by PHP . And I think after driving my truck every day where ever I go on the 87 custom tune I can definitely tell a difference in performance with the 93 octane tune. You can't just say butt-dyno cause obviously I know how my truck drives. For example let's say you have a performance tune you know exact how your truck drives and if some how your programmer messed up and went back to stock program. You can't tell me you wouldn't get the difference.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 05:19 PM
  #334  
MGD's Avatar
MGD
former member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 857
Default

Originally Posted by CHUMCHAL72
I have my 87 custom tune by PHP . And I think after driving my truck every day where ever I go on the 87 custom tune I can definitely tell a difference in performance with the 93 octane tune. You can't just say butt-dyno cause obviously I know how my truck drives. For example let's say you have a performance tune you know exact how your truck drives and if some how your programmer messed up and went back to stock program. You can't tell me you wouldn't get the difference.
Couple things:

1. Ye need to define what you perceive the difference to be. Is it part-throttle response? Off-the-line? WOT? Shifting?

2. You need to realize we are talking aboot 6 points of octane, and a timing curve to match. You would expect to see a bit more 'dig'. And a true 'perf' tune can take the motor far above the stock rev limit, where the HP peak actually lives. That's one reason of many why even 87 custom rocks compared to stock.

3. If it's shifting that is better canned, then you should have reported that fact to PHP long ago so they could have corrected it. Shifting algorithm refinement may takes a couple/few iterations to acheive the user's specific preferences.

4. You are not datalogging, so PHP very much depends upon user feedback and iterative re-tuning to meet yer expectations. If you never bothered, then YOU own this problem. Every truck is different and responds to custom tuning in different ways, as there are many, many different strategy codes.

5. The custom tune will be far more refined than the non-strategy-matched generic canned tunes. Again - if they don;t appear to b, then you should have reported it. and again - you now OWN it.

6. Call PHP to discuss in detail - but be prepared to cough up some dinero if it's been a while. Them folks gotta eat, lol.

7. I've NEVER had a canned 91-93 octane tune outperform a lower octane fully-datalogged, dialed-in custom tune (Caveat: Tuning Platform = SCT)

Y'know what? I don't think yer listening - so go ahead and do what you want, as it appears yer mind's made up and you really do believe that you know better than PHP's lead wizard, Bill Cohron.

MGD out.

Last edited by MGD; Mar 15, 2015 at 05:22 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 05:34 PM
  #335  
CHUMCHAL72's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 611
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by MGD

Couple things:

1. Ye need to define what you perceive the difference to be. Is it part-throttle response? Off-the-line? WOT? Shifting?

2. You need to realize we are talking aboot 6 points of octane, and a timing curve to match. You would expect to see a bit more 'dig'. And a true 'perf' tune can take the motor far above the stock rev limit, where the HP peak actually lives. That's one reason of many why even 87 custom rocks compared to stock.

3. If it's shifting that is better canned, then you should have reported that fact to PHP long ago so they could have corrected it. Shifting algorithm refinement may takes a couple/few iterations to acheive the user's specific preferences.

4. You are not datalogging, so PHP very much depends upon user feedback and iterative re-tuning to meet yer expectations. If you never bothered, then YOU own this problem. Every truck is different and responds to custom tuning in different ways, as there are many, many different strategy codes.

5. The custom tune will be far more refined than the non-strategy-matched generic canned tunes. Again - if they don;t appear to b, then you should have reported it. and again - you now OWN it.

6. Call PHP to discuss in detail - but be prepared to cough up some dinero if it's been a while. Them folks gotta eat, lol.

7. I've NEVER had a canned 91-93 octane tune outperform a lower octane fully-datalogged, dialed-in custom tune (Caveat: Tuning Platform = SCT)

Y'know what? I don't think yer listening - so go ahead and do what you want, as it appears yer mind's made up and you really do believe that you know better than PHP's lead wizard, Bill Cohron.

MGD out.
1. I wasn't trying to start a war with you. Honestly I don't much about how the different settings affect it to much. I never said I knew more than the "head wizard" at PHP. I simply said I feel that it runs better with a the 93 octane tune.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 05:45 PM
  #336  
08silverbullet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 78
From: Pearland, TX
Default

MGD has always steered me in the right direction. He helped me alot when I first came on here and has yet to give me any bad info. Thanks man I appreciate the help. I am just nervous about putting the tune in with the way she's idling right now and I found quite a bit of carbon on the outside of the pipe to the inlet of the muffler think I may have an exhaust leak
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 06:44 PM
  #337  
Modular man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 280
Likes: 13
Default

I agree with MGD U need to let them no just wat ur looking for in a tunes . Stay in contact with them they will figure out wats going on and will fix ur problems
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 07:28 AM
  #338  
dolphinsnum1fan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
From: Virginia Beach VA
Default

does anyone know how to change how fast it downshifts like from 2nd to first? i now with the 87 performance tune barley press the gas pedal down and it downshifts and jumps the truck. i don't like that at all, it downshifts way to soon.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 07:28 AM
  #339  
dolphinsnum1fan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
From: Virginia Beach VA
Default

Also let's post 0-60 times on here. I got 7.47 on the canned 87 tow tune with me changing the settings. Just this morning with the 87 performance tune that PHP just did for me I got 7.67. Now I know I'm supposed to be getting a better time on the performance than the tow tune so what's up with that? Maybe it's me who knows. I'm also driving an 04 FX4 supercab that's weighs 7200 pounds.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 07:55 AM
  #340  
MGD's Avatar
MGD
former member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 857
Default

Originally Posted by dolphinsnum1fan
Also let's post 0-60 times on here. I got 7.47 on the canned 87 tow tune with me changing the settings. Just this morning with the 87 performance tune that PHP just did for me I got 7.67. Now I know I'm supposed to be getting a better time on the performance than the tow tune so what's up with that? Maybe it's me who knows. I'm also driving an 04 FX4 supercab that's weighs 7200 pounds.
Unless yer doing this using professionl ET equipment, under identical & controlled conditions, forget it. Yer numbers are meaningless.

BTW - visit a few online ET calculators - you'll quickly discover that a truck with the mass, huge driveline losses rolling resistance and low power levels these possess ( even with a canned tuner) will NEVER get into the 7's, Or even the 8's for the most part. And those reporting gettin' into the 6's? Comical.

Oh yeah- we already have a specific place to post time slips. lol

MGD
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.