Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Hellcat Ram?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 12:45 PM
  #21  
VTX1800N1's Avatar
Sheep Dog
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 330
Default

Originally Posted by USN_4290
I wouldn't shoot the idea down. It's obviously a potential release as Ram has put it on their website http://m.ramtrucks.com/en/limited-ed...500/rebel-trx/
People can trash talk Ram all day, but reality is they tend to give more features on lower end models than their competition and offer more innovative designs. I.E. Ram has used aluminum hoods well before Ford used an entire aluminum body, they are still the only truck to offer air suspension, they released the Diesel engine in the 1500 series whereas Ford is still pending, their rear suspension hasn't had leaf springs in the 1500's in almost a decade, their base model sound system out performs even Ford's Sony system, they tend to have a better towing capacity, and they offered LED tail lights in 2013. Not saying they're the best, but I've had two of the newer body style Ram's and would buy another one in a heartbeat whereas it would take some convincing for me to buy another F150.
Ford had an aluminum hood on every F150 as early as 1997...

Last edited by VTX1800N1; Sep 30, 2016 at 03:40 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 02:25 PM
  #22  
HCFX2013's Avatar
Beer Gut Extraordinaire
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 17,371
Likes: 2,111
From: Canada
Default

This is Ram's last ditch effort to try to attract attention to the stagnant and dated 4th gen Ram platform that is going into it's 8th year without a redesign. It's old, it's tired, redesign it already.


Didn't they already take a stab at the Raptor with the Ram Runner a few years ago?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 03:18 PM
  #23  
Dave Goldman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 168
Likes: 13
From: NC
Default

Have lots of gas money laying around
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 03:20 PM
  #24  
berty's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 605
From: Fallston, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Goldman
Have lots of gas money laying around
I think it took car and drive 2 hours to drain the gas tank of the Charger. In a much heavier truck moving 37" tires I'm thinking a third of that time lol
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:01 PM
  #25  
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
Ford Truck Lover
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 754
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by berty
I think it took car and drive 2 hours to drain the gas tank of the Charger. In a much heavier truck moving 37" tires I'm thinking a third of that time lol
575 hp? I could have it drained in a 1/2 hour! It's hard enough for me to keep my foot out of my 3.5L TT.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:32 PM
  #26  
Vizsla_Buddy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 131
Likes: 38
From: Raleigh NC
Default

Originally Posted by Wannafbody
Raptor killer but doubtful that it would go into production for a street legal truck as is, if it makes it into production, I'd expect it to be tamed down.
The video showed the undercarriage at work. The parts all looked "standard duty" to me (hard to tell). In order to sustain the punishment of off road at that speed, significant engineering has to be done to pretty much everything. The Raptor has years of production and customer use. I wouldn't bet against it.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:35 PM
  #27  
gopherman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 293
Default

FCA has been doing some cool stuff with their vehicles and the hellcat motor. The problem is...it says a lot when you have all that horsepower but are incapable of using it. None of their hellcat products are well-designed. They just took their current models and put a bigger engine in it without taking things like handling into consideration.

I was seriously disappointed when I saw that 707 hp only yields 0-60 times in the high 3's in the Challenger. Vehicles with far less power produce quicker times and handle better...and they have interiors that don't look like cheap plastic sh**.

Last edited by gopherman; Sep 30, 2016 at 04:38 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:37 PM
  #28  
LSchicago's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by USN_4290
I wouldn't shoot the idea down. It's obviously a potential release as Ram has put it on their website http://m.ramtrucks.com/en/limited-ed...500/rebel-trx/
People can trash talk Ram all day, but reality is they tend to give more features on lower end models than their competition and offer more innovative designs. I.E. Ram has used aluminum hoods well before Ford used an entire aluminum body, they are still the only truck to offer air suspension, they released the Diesel engine in the 1500 series whereas Ford is still pending, their rear suspension hasn't had leaf springs in the 1500's in almost a decade, their base model sound system out performs even Ford's Sony system, they tend to have a better towing capacity, and they offered LED tail lights in 2013. Not saying they're the best, but I've had two of the newer body style Ram's and would buy another one in a heartbeat whereas it would take some convincing for me to buy another F150.
Ram used the aluminum hood starting in 2009. Ford used them on the F150 as early as 1997, with some models earlier. Coil suspension on pickups is nothing new or good. Chevy used them in the 67-72 trucks. It is the reason Ram 1500's can't carry as much weight as the F150's.

Last edited by LSchicago; Sep 30, 2016 at 04:40 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:42 PM
  #29  
LSchicago's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by gopherman
FCA has been doing some cool stuff with their vehicles and the hellcat motor. The problem is...it says a lot when you have all that horsepower but are incapable of using it. None of their hellcat products are well-designed. They just took their current models and put a bigger engine in it without taking things like handling into consideration.

I was seriously disappointed when I saw that 707 hp only yields 0-60 times in the high 3's in the Challenger. Vehicles with far less power produce quicker times and handle better...and they have interiors that don't look like cheap plastic sh**.
The 520HP 2016 GT350 has beat the Hellcats bone stock.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:46 PM
  #30  
gopherman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 293
Default

Originally Posted by LSchicago
The 520HP 2016 GT350 has beat the Hellcats bone stock.
Yes, and it's arguable that the GT350 is a far superior vehicle in almost every way...aside from HP.

It just shows that FCA's Hellcat strategy simply works to sell but it's not gaining them a whole lot of respect with real enthusiasts.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.