Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.

Future F150 with 6.2 Engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2019 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
nixamousa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
Default Future F150 with 6.2 Engine?

I am courious to know what interest there might be for having the 6.2 engine in a future F150, at all trim levels. For those of us that prefer a V8 and, the ride of the F150, this would seem to the ideal setup for many, especially those doing some towing. The larger block V8's are available in competitors, why not Ford?
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2019 | 01:46 PM
  #2  
obusnizzle's Avatar
none.
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 108
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

Probably won't happen at all. The 3.5L Eco puts down more power than the competitors and the Diesel fills a market gap. Big cubic inches aren't coming back. Efficiency numbers matter to the regulatory agencies.....why do you think we have aluminum trucks, 10 speed transmissions, start/stop functions, direct injection, and variable valve timing? The turbo V6 engines do a fine job. I think a lot of this has to do with antiquated thinking, small motor, efficient turbos, direct injection are the future, progress doesn't care about cubic inches. Seriously, look at the performance numbers of the 3.3L base engine and compare them to the 5.4L 2V PI motor. Look at the numbers of the 5.4L 3V in its final year versus all of the current options.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2019 | 02:55 PM
  #3  
chimmike's Avatar
Senile member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 1,058
From: Sarasota, FL area
Default

the 6.2 is going away.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2019 | 03:01 PM
  #4  
Jeff1024's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 633
Likes: 223
Default

I'm going to assume you mean the new 7.3L Gas V8, but either way....Won't happen because of CAFE requirements. Ford can get away /w the 7.3 and its lower MPG in the 250/350 line b/c those do not factor into the manufacturer CAFE Rating. Not so in the light truck line.

Last edited by Jeff1024; Jun 4, 2019 at 04:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2019 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
DarrinT04's Avatar
Senior Member
Supporting Member

5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 6,693
Likes: 1,222
From: Maysville KY
Default

I don't see it happening. especially now that there is an optional diesel engine in the line up
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2019 | 01:59 PM
  #6  
mass-hole's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 1,280
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff1024
I'm going to assume you mean the new 7.3L Gas V8, but either way....Won't happen because of CAFE requirements. Ford can get away /w the 7.3 and its lower MPG in the 250/350 line b/c those do not factor into the manufacturer CAFE Rating. No so in the light truck line.
Was gunna say, ford has a fancy new pushrod V8 that should fit, but I doubt they will.

Also, the competitors V8's may have more displacement, but with the exception of the GM 6.2L, none are really putting out any more power than the 5.0. And the 6.2L is hard to get because it is limited to the highest trims and is a $4000 option. It sucks. Literally, GM's new 3.0L diesel in the 1500 is priced the same as the 6.2L. Makes no sense.

Last edited by mass-hole; Jun 4, 2019 at 02:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2019 | 02:07 PM
  #7  
mass-hole's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 1,280
Default

Originally Posted by DarrinT04
I don't see it happening. especially now that there is an optional diesel engine in the line up
The diesel is mystery to me and it seems to be that way for others, because I have seen one ever. No one is buying them because they cost $4000 more than the 2.7 which gets similar MPG's and makes far more HP, and it doesn't come close to outperform the 3.5 Ecoboost. You would have a hard time convincing me that I needed the PSD over any of the gasoline engines.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2019 | 02:10 PM
  #8  
djfllmn's Avatar
Administrator
Supporting Member

10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 23,892
Likes: 5,969
From: Amish Country
Default

Originally Posted by mass-hole
The diesel is mystery to me and it seems to be that way for others, because I have seen one ever. No one is buying them because they cost $4000 more than the 2.7 which gets similar MPG's and makes far more HP, and it doesn't come close to outperform the 3.5 Ecoboost. You would have a hard time convincing me that I needed the PSD over any of the gasoline engines.
x2. The 3.0 is a slug compared to the other engines with the exception of the 3.3
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2019 | 02:44 PM
  #9  
sholxgt's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 536
From: Georgia
Default

The motors are going smaller, not larger in half ton trucks. I would not be the least bit surprised if the largest motor offered in the 2021 is a 4.8 v8 with the next option being the 2.7. I could even see the 3.5 going away since Ford has given the 2.7 beefier internals. They may just offer the 2.7 as a regular and HO version.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2019 | 02:48 PM
  #10  
KingDeleted's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 679
Likes: 133
Default

Originally Posted by obusnizzle
Probably won't happen at all. The 3.5L Eco puts down more power than the competitors and the Diesel fills a market gap. Big cubic inches aren't coming back. Efficiency numbers matter to the regulatory agencies.....why do you think we have aluminum trucks, 10 speed transmissions, start/stop functions, direct injection, and variable valve timing? The turbo V6 engines do a fine job. I think a lot of this has to do with antiquated thinking, small motor, efficient turbos, direct injection are the future, progress doesn't care about cubic inches. Seriously, look at the performance numbers of the 3.3L base engine and compare them to the 5.4L 2V PI motor. Look at the numbers of the 5.4L 3V in its final year versus all of the current options.
numbers don’t tell the whole story. I’d much rather tow with the 5.4 than a base 3.3. Heck I’d even opt for the 94’ 7.3 diesel with all of 185hp, pulls like a tractor and get 18 mpg towing.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.