Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Is there a way

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 02:09 PM
  #21  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by texastruckguy
No doubt there. 5.4 would eat the 4.6 and 4.2.
My 5.4 is slow.. But it'll out tow any F150 in our generation, it would probably make a newer one have its feeling hurt while towing. I also would never own a F150 with a 4.6 again. I had a 03 2wd SCab with a 4.6 and even after swapping gears to 4.10's it was still a slug.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 02:32 PM
  #22  
elkeyjrF150's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

It seems as though it would be, but i had a 94 F-150 with 300 inline 6, and i could out pull, outrun, and use less fuel than the 302 V8. Made by same company. Every engine type has its quarks and even every engine within that type does.

Had a buddy in college with a 96 reg cab short bed with headers and dual exhaust on his inline 6. He still couldnt keep up with my Reg cab long bed. Both 4wd. Just depends on how they were taken care of and how they were broke in.

Friend got a 2008 f-150 crew with 5.4. He broke his in towing and i think its because he did that, he couldnt ever get more than 14 MPG. But it would out tow alot of other similar vehicles.

I dont have any proof to prove or disprove what anybody or myself is saying, but it makes sense to me.


Originally Posted by Jacob.P93
I don't understand how a non boosted v6 could be putting out more than a v8 that comes from the same builder. it goes against all logic. but. anything is possible. and yes new plugs and cops are a big reason a motor losses power.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

It all depends on how it is driven. These newer vehicles have what is called Adaptive programming. If I reset my PCM and drive like I'm driving Ms. Daisy it will be a slug. But if I drive it like Mario Andretti It doesnt like to keep the rear wheels planted.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 02:41 PM
  #24  
elkeyjrF150's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

I have an 03 f150 with 5.4. Would i be able to reset my PCM? My truck has always been a little sluggish compare to other stock's. If so how do i do it?




Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
It all depends on how it is driven. These newer vehicles have what is called Adaptive programming. If I reset my PCM and drive like I'm driving Ms. Daisy it will be a slug. But if I drive it like Mario Andretti It doesnt like to keep the rear wheels planted.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 02:51 PM
  #25  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Yes disconnect both battery cables. Touch the ground and positive terminals together for 30 seconds. YOu have reset the PCM, and it will activate the relearn procedures. It takes up to 100 miles before it turns off. I drive mine like I stole it, until it has relearned itself.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 05:10 PM
  #26  
Jacob.P93's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,842
Likes: 87
From: Montana
Default

Originally Posted by elkeyjrF150
It seems as though it would be, but i had a 94 F-150 with 300 inline 6, and i could out pull, outrun, and use less fuel than the 302 V8. Made by same company. Every engine type has its quarks and even every engine within that type does.

Had a buddy in college with a 96 reg cab short bed with headers and dual exhaust on his inline 6. He still couldnt keep up with my Reg cab long bed. Both 4wd. Just depends on how they were taken care of and how they were broke in.

Friend got a 2008 f-150 crew with 5.4. He broke his in towing and i think its because he did that, he couldnt ever get more than 14 MPG. But it would out tow alot of other similar vehicles.

I dont have any proof to prove or disprove what anybody or myself is saying, but it makes sense to me.
An straight six is completely different then what I'm talking about. i think the 300 straight six is the best engine ford has made.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 07:39 PM
  #27  
elkeyjrF150's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

I think its cool that they have started revisiting some of the old engines like the 302. I hope they revisit the straight six. It would be a beast with all the advancements in technology, if they can get a 3.5L dual turbo to hit 365 HP, i dont see any reason why a single turbo 4.9 inline 6 could match it with better torq or exceed.

I kick myself everyday for selling my old truck, but i do enjoy my new screw


Originally Posted by Jacob.P93
An straight six is completely different then what I'm talking about. i think the 300 straight six is the best engine ford has made.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 12:42 AM
  #28  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

The problem with straight 6 gasoline powered engines are that they are super imbalanced and hard to get extremely effiecent.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 06:05 AM
  #29  
ford361's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 303
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
The problem with straight 6 gasoline powered engines are that they are super imbalanced and hard to get extremely effiecent.
Tell that to BMW

Also when making a statement with subjective terms like "extremely efficient", you should first define what it is that you consider to be "extremely" efficient so there is some sort of number to compare to when arriving at the conclusion something doesn't meet that criteria.
What you have said is extremely vague and really doesn't have much, if any, meaning.

I've also just read this on wiki:
"An inline six engine is in perfect primary and secondary mechanical balance, without the use of a balance shaft. The engine is in primary couple balance because the front and rear trio of cylinders are mirror images, and the pistons move in pairs. That is, piston #1 mirrors #6, #2 mirrors #5, and #3 mirrors #4, largely eliminating the polar rocking motion that would otherwise result. Secondary imbalance is avoided because the crankshaft has six crank throws arranged in three planes offset at 120°. The result is that the secondary forces that are caused by differences from purely sinusoidal motion sum to zero."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-six_engine

Last edited by ford361; Jun 27, 2012 at 06:10 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 07:21 AM
  #30  
OTG02's Avatar
Thread Starter
2015 F-150 3.5 ecoboost
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 54
From: Canton Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by ford361

Tell that to BMW

Also when making a statement with subjective terms like "extremely efficient", you should first define what it is that you consider to be "extremely" efficient so there is some sort of number to compare to when arriving at the conclusion something doesn't meet that criteria.
What you have said is extremely vague and really doesn't have much, if any, meaning.

I've also just read this on wiki:
"An inline six engine is in perfect primary and secondary mechanical balance, without the use of a balance shaft. The engine is in primary couple balance because the front and rear trio of cylinders are mirror images, and the pistons move in pairs. That is, piston #1 mirrors #6, #2 mirrors #5, and #3 mirrors #4, largely eliminating the polar rocking motion that would otherwise result. Secondary imbalance is avoided because the crankshaft has six crank throws arranged in three planes offset at 120°. The result is that the secondary forces that are caused by differences from purely sinusoidal motion sum to zero."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-six_engine
Ummmm ok if u say so. I'll agree. Lol. Looks mechanical enough. LOL. So the primary and the secondary work together to create the centrical motion needed to complete the rotation of the cam shaft to be perfectly balanced an In Proportion with the rotating mass of the engine AHHHHHH I see now. ROTFLMAO. ok really I see. NOTE: I'm not trying to be a smart **** I am just being silly. I like to mke people laugh.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.