Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Is there a way

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2012, 09:52 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

Let me add some details. US car builders have never been able to make straight 6 effiecent. Germans engineers over engineer everything.
Old 06-27-2012, 11:07 AM
  #32  
Member
 
ford361's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 303
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Let me add some details. US car builders have never been able to make straight 6 effiecent. Germans engineers over engineer everything.
I'm no automotive encyclopedia but how many US automakers have produced straight 6's to begin with ?
And have any been produced in the last 10-15 years where efficiency started to become a big deal?
And when talking efficiency are we comparing an old ford 300 I6 to a 2013 1.6 ecoboost ?

Again, you still have yet to give your definition of efficient - we have no base line on which to judge by.
At what point does an engine go from being inefficient to efficient ? How is efficiency measured ?
I'm not trying to be douchey - just trying to point that you are making statements without much or any meaning behind them.

On one hand you're saying US automakers haven't been able to make an efficient straight 6, but by default have admitted German automakers have, so therefore German's have 'over-engineered' their motor by making it efficient ?
So again, by default, you are saying unless a straight 6 has been 'over-engineered' it has no possibility of being efficient ?

I'm sorry but this make doesn't any sense.

Last edited by ford361; 06-27-2012 at 11:10 AM.
Old 06-27-2012, 02:41 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Jzward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I know jeep was running the inline 6 for many years finally getting rid of it in 2006 the 300 i6 was dropped from ford in 1996 I know one of the guys I work with loves the 4.0 I6 motor and won't buy any other motor but as far as being efficient we do not know your term for it
Old 06-27-2012, 08:29 PM
  #34  
?x4
Junior Member
 
?x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jzward
My teacher used to work at the Ford factory in Mich. And he says when they built the 4.2 motor the first motor was putting out more horsepower and torque then the 4.6 so they had to retune the pcm to make the 4.6 had better numbers but that is what he said I couldn't find any thing about it
Between 91-99 the 2v 4.6 only made 215hp and the 97-08 4.2 make around 202hp. It could be very possible that they would have tuned the 4.2 down.
Old 06-28-2012, 12:25 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Jzward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

See I think so too but who knows I just know I like my motor till I finish my other one




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.