Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Increase mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2014 | 09:26 PM
  #21  
sjessen's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spannerhead
What engine and drivetrain do you have? Diff ratio?



I got an honest-to-goodness 22 mpg calculated on a recent 375-mile trip. Topped off the tank, reset the odo, and checked the elapsed mileage against the gas I put in the next time I refueled.

I have a 2WD extended cab 4.6 with a bed cover, 265/75s and a 3.08 rear, and it's in a good state of tune. The mileage setup, in other words.
Mine is a 5.4 with 3.55 gears. Not sure if it is totally believable but I logged over 19 on several occasions doing 68 or so on the interstate with cruise. Before installing the bedcover it never topped 18 mpg. Will be interested to see if the improved mileage continues.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2014 | 11:14 PM
  #22  
renswic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Default

My first tank of gas got me about 9mpg, that was all in 4x4 and of course playing around with a big engine(old truck had a dying 4.3 V6) 2nd tank with all city, 90% 2 wheel drive and only one time of snow donuts was just over 12mpg. In both cases I'm getting 4-5mpg more then my old 1991 s10.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2014 | 11:27 PM
  #23  
Spannerhead's Avatar
Impractical
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 167
Likes: 8
From: Chattanooga, TN
Default

Originally Posted by sjessen
Mine is a 5.4 with 3.55 gears. Not sure if it is totally believable but I logged over 19 on several occasions doing 68 or so on the interstate with cruise. Before installing the bedcover it never topped 18 mpg. Will be interested to see if the improved mileage continues.
Why shouldn't it be believable? If the gas pump is correct (and there's no reason to think it isn't given the way those are regulated) and your odometer is accurate, it's just simple math. No belief required.

I really think the bed cover makes a difference. Without it, you're basically dragging a huge board (the tailgate) through the air. That can't be good.

What are your highway rpms? I'm ticking over at 1500 at 60 mph indicated, which is more like 63-64 mph on account of the larger tire size throwing off the speedo.

Last edited by Spannerhead; Feb 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 07:42 AM
  #24  
sjessen's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spannerhead
Why shouldn't it be believable? If the gas pump is correct (and there's no reason to think it isn't given the way those are regulated) and your odometer is accurate, it's just simple math. No belief required.

I really think the bed cover makes a difference. Without it, you're basically dragging a huge board (the tailgate) through the air. That can't be good.

What are your highway rpms? I'm ticking over at 1500 at 60 mph indicated, which is more like 63-64 mph on account of the larger tire size throwing off the speedo.
Have no problem doing the math. The general consensus seems to be there is not consensus about whether or not bed covers actually help mileage, especially by up to 10%.

Not exactly sure on the rpms's Probably around 1800-2000 at 70 mph.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 07:49 AM
  #25  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 7,630
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by Spannerhead

I really think the bed cover makes a difference. Without it, you're basically dragging a huge board (the tailgate) through the air. That can't be good.
You would think, - but Myth busters proved that it didn't make a difference with or without a cover.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 07:54 AM
  #26  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 7,630
From: MI
Default

Also, if your getting 18-19 mpg with a 10th generation 5four, you should be on that Ripply's believe it or not television show. That's a record for sure.

Perhaps there's one of those top secrete Tornada's wedgied into the intake pipe ehh ? Has to be something as spectacular as that I expect.

Last edited by Jbrew; Feb 20, 2014 at 11:13 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 08:19 AM
  #27  
Tackle's Avatar
Title
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,672
Likes: 499
From: USA
Default

Getting better mpg than what was shown on the window sticker 10+ years later is quite an achievement. Especially with a stock truck.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 02:07 PM
  #28  
Ariat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Spannerhead
What engine and drivetrain do you have? Diff ratio?



I got an honest-to-goodness 22 mpg calculated on a recent 375-mile trip. Topped off the tank, reset the odo, and checked the elapsed mileage against the gas I put in the next time I refueled.

I have a 2WD extended cab 4.6 with a bed cover, 265/75s and a 3.08 rear, and it's in a good state of tune. The mileage setup, in other words.
Not entirely sure what my diff ratio is, never felt the need to look. But I have the 4.6l v8... FX4.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2014 | 11:32 AM
  #29  
howie2092's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 13
From: Arvada Colorado
Default

I would bet my paycheck that all of these people who brag about spectacular mileage, or who complain about absolutely terrible mileage... they all have the speedometer and odometer completely out of calibration.

The speedometer/odometer is about +/- 5% from the factory. Add in some non-stock-diameter tires, unknown rear gears, etc.... and your mileage calculations will be all over the place.

GPS mileage averaged over several (ten?) tanks will get you a really solid idea of your mileage. One tank is not enough.
Or you can do what I did: use a GPS and a programmer to calibrate your speedo.

Fun fact, a buddy of mine has an old k-10 blazer - it has an aftermarket GPS speedo/odo. It is always correct regardless of tire size because it is not connected to the driveline.

Last edited by howie2092; Feb 21, 2014 at 11:35 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2014 | 11:37 AM
  #30  
Tackle's Avatar
Title
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,672
Likes: 499
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by howie2092
I would bet my paycheck that all of these people who brag about spectacular mileage, or who complain about absolutely terrible mileage... they all have the speedometer and odometer completely out of calibration.

The speedometer/odometer is about +/- 5% from the factory. Add in some non-stock-diameter tires, unknown rear gears, etc.... and your mileage calculations will be all over the place.

GPS mileage averaged over several (ten?) tanks will get you a really solid idea of your mileage. Or you can use a GPS and a programmer to calibrate your speedo.

.
How much do you make again? I'll PM you my paypal address so you can send it over.

I said I get 9-10 which I would consider terrible. My gears are stock and I know the ratio, my tire size is stock. I've tested with Magellen GPS, phone GPS, I have had 2 programmers and have ran my truck stock. I've adjusted for squatting height of the tires. I'm within 2 mph at 60 on the extremes of the combinations. Over 10 tanks at the max of 2mph, there would not be a significant enough difference to bring me up much higher in average mpg.

Now what should I buy the money you're going to send me?

Last edited by Tackle; Feb 21, 2014 at 11:42 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.