Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

HID's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 02:56 PM
  #31  
3p0x1fx4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
From: Spanaway, Wa
Default

Haha, this thread is getting good. See what you did creedua?

Just kidding.

In all seriousness, HID's really should be installed using projectors. Not just because PnP kits tend to scatter light but also because you will make full use of the light the HID's put out.

Sure, PnP HID kits are brighter than factory halogens, but with projectors you will be able to focus the light where you need it and not as much at oncoming traffic.

...Now back to the bashing.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 06:17 PM
  #32  
GATORB8's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 154
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 3p0x1fx4
In all seriousness, HID's really should be installed using projectors. Not just because PnP kits tend to scatter light but also because you will make full use of the light the HID's put out.

Sure, PnP HID kits are brighter than factory halogens, but with projectors you will be able to focus the light where you need it and not as much at oncoming traffic..
There are two types of burners, though. "S" burners are intended for use in projectors, "R" burners are intended for use in reflectors. "S" are intended to use the projector for beam cutoff, "R" have built in opacity in areas that are intended to create the cutoff. Some Mercedes have "R" type burners in reflector headlamps from the factory.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 06:25 PM
  #33  
3p0x1fx4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
From: Spanaway, Wa
Default

Well the PnP kits I'm seeing aparently must be of the "S" variety because I'm not seeing any kind of cutoff. Just good old fashioned blinding glare.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:01 PM
  #34  
GATORB8's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 154
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

Yeah, I haven't seen a PnP "R" type bulb in an H13, it'd be nice if they did. I've found a few sites with other bulb types in an "anti glare" setup that accomplishes the same thing. I imagine if it works it would be a much better compromise to actually install in your vehicle.

Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 11:14 AM
  #35  
08Darkness's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 390
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by GATORB8

There are two types of burners, though. "S" burners are intended for use in projectors, "R" burners are intended for use in reflectors. "S" are intended to use the projector for beam cutoff, "R" have built in opacity in areas that are intended to create the cutoff. Some Mercedes have "R" type burners in reflector headlamps from the factory.
I just checked my gma's Lincoln last nite and it definitely didn't have projectors.

Seems to me that if ford has them in Lincolns it should be able to get them for other fomoco vehicles.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 11:17 AM
  #36  
iRub1Out's Avatar
Problem Solver
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 358
Default

So in conclusion:

Replacing your headlights with HID is always a better option, regardless of application. Though some view stock housings as an annoyance, others see it as an unnecessary expense in addition to the HID's themselves. I too use HID's in my stock housings, and very rarely get flashed (...by headlights...cars).

I don't personally see it being reasonable to spend upwards of $250+ for a set of goofy ricer looking housings that are far inferior to the stock ones anyway, just for the projector lens. Either way, it's all about personal preference and $$.

I look at it like this... Odds are that the driver coming at me wouldn't care if he were blinding me with his HID glare (hypothetically of course). We do live in a "me me me" world where drivers don't pay attention and care even less. I am indifferent. If glare affects you bad enough to cause an accident (God forbid) or in any other way disrupt your ability to drive safely, odds are you shouldn't be driving anyway.

That's my 1/2 page 2c.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #37  
Wiggles85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by StuckZipper
So in conclusion:

Replacing your headlights with HID is always a better option, regardless of application. Though some view stock housings as an annoyance, others see it as an unnecessary expense in addition to the HID's themselves. I too use HID's in my stock housings, and very rarely get flashed (...by headlights...cars).

I don't personally see it being reasonable to spend upwards of $250+ for a set of goofy ricer looking housings that are far inferior to the stock ones anyway, just for the projector lens. Either way, it's all about personal preference and $$.

I look at it like this... Odds are that the driver coming at me wouldn't care if he were blinding me with his HID glare (hypothetically of course). We do live in a "me me me" world where drivers don't pay attention and care even less. I am indifferent. If glare affects you bad enough to cause an accident (God forbid) or in any other way disrupt your ability to drive safely, odds are you shouldn't be driving anyway.

That's my 1/2 page 2c.
Perhaps, but you also have to realize that most people won't actually flash you even if it is bothering them.

It is a better option, but it has to be done right. There are a lot of ideas out there that are good, but were just poorly implemented.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 11:42 AM
  #38  
eclark53520's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by StuckZipper
So in conclusion]
I don't personally see it being reasonable to spend upwards of $250+ for a set of goofy ricer looking housings that are far inferior to the stock ones anyway, just for the projector lens. Either way, it's all about personal preference and $$.
No, it's not about money and personal preference, it's about safety and respect. The latter apparently very few people in this thread seem to have.

The knowledge about HID lighting here is on the level of kindergarten reading ability.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 12:22 PM
  #39  
shaynecsmith's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 488
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by eclark53520

No, it's not about money and personal preference, it's about safety and respect. The latter apparently very few people in this thread seem to have.

The knowledge about HID lighting here is on the level of kindergarten reading ability.
If were so dumb go to another forum. Easy enough.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 12:24 PM
  #40  
eclark53520's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by shaynecsmith
If were so dumb go to another forum. Easy enough.
You're not dumb. Some people here just don't care to educate themselves.

BTW: It's we're, not were.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 AM.