The Ultimate MPG thread.
Hello F150 Forum, new here and have to say great content all around, enjoying the banter. I figured this thread looked like a great place to ask for some feedback...considering we are speaking MPG, check out this aero hybrid tonneau cover / cab extender...any thoughts?
That would do way more for gas mileage than any hydrogen generator... 
Seriously, though, the fastback style cover will significantly improve aerodynamics. Someone put one on an f150 over a year ago and posted pics. I haven't seen anything from them since, though. They even reported they did wind tunnel testing.

Seriously, though, the fastback style cover will significantly improve aerodynamics. Someone put one on an f150 over a year ago and posted pics. I haven't seen anything from them since, though. They even reported they did wind tunnel testing.
lol not to be too far off the hydrogen generator topic
I'll look for them in the archives be interesting to see their wind tunnel results.
I noticed a lot of dashboard pics on this thread so I couldn't resist.
One thing we noticed besides gains in fuel efficiency was that under severe cross wind or just choppy wind conditions the steering kept neutral and you didn't need to fight as much to keep a straight line. Thanks for the feedback Mike!
I'll look for them in the archives be interesting to see their wind tunnel results.I noticed a lot of dashboard pics on this thread so I couldn't resist.
One thing we noticed besides gains in fuel efficiency was that under severe cross wind or just choppy wind conditions the steering kept neutral and you didn't need to fight as much to keep a straight line. Thanks for the feedback Mike!
Last edited by Truck Mullet Guy; Mar 22, 2014 at 11:15 AM.
Mike reading a couple of articles online hardly makes you an expert. Obviously thermodynamics can explain that. Hho mixed with air and gas creates a more complex and faster burn, and that is a fact jack. That being said I still do not condone putting it on your vehicle. It will eat your alternator and internals. Mike engineer As far as your claim that you can't create more energy than it takes to create it... Let's just say we used to be executed for thinking the world was flat and that the earth was the center of the universe
http://gigaom.com/2014/02/12/for-the-first-time-nuclear-fusion-produces-more-energy-than-it-takes-in/.
http://gigaom.com/2014/02/12/for-the-first-time-nuclear-fusion-produces-more-energy-than-it-takes-in/.
2. We aren't exactly talking about nuclear fusion here.
3. "overall the reactor is still losing far more energy than it puts out", from your article.
Thanks

Joe






