Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

EcoBoost durability?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2016 | 04:32 PM
  #31  
NASSTY's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12,075
Likes: 4,002
From: ME
Default

Originally Posted by Sherwood
just to fan the flames, like the evil pest that I am, are there as many of these threads about the 5.0? Seems when it rains it really pours with the EB's. I have often wondered if maybe I should have gone with the EB, but after towing my 5th wheel many thousands of miles with the 5.0, I 'shudder' at the thought of being dead on the road so far from home.

perhaps there are lots of threads like this, and in my bias I only notice the troubled EB threads, but it seems these come up often:
https://www.f150forum.com/f2/just-an...nt-fix-315603/
That sounds about right.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2016 | 07:20 PM
  #32  
TomB985's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 303
Likes: 156
From: Isanti, MN
Default

Originally Posted by Echoboost
2. Not the most advanced thing on the planet so it's from the stone age.
Yeah, I understood that. But that's the position EB owners typically take when attacking the 5.0L, so I used your phrasing as an example.

I don't think there's a bad engine offering. I honestly think each has its purpose, and I would probably be happy with any of them unloaded. Our plans include a camper in the near future, so everything but the 3.5L N/A was on the table for me, but if pulling heavy things wasn't in the cards it certainly would have been.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 01:56 AM
  #33  
Velosprout's Avatar
10 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 213
From: East Central Illinois
Default

Engine longevity factors....
1. engine maintenance
2. driving habits
3. vehicle loads/towing and hauling
4. inferior aftermarket parts or modifications
5. tuning
6. quality of oils and filters
7. ambient temperatures and humidity
8. stop & go vs. highway mileage
9. vehicle gearing
10. aftermarket wheels and tires/higher rotating mass
11. snowplowing
12. airborne particulate level
13. fuel quality
14. driving through water/salt water exposure
15. collisions and animal damages
16. luck
17. manual choke and carb vs. fuel injection
18. electronic ignition vs. points & condenser
19. racing, truck pulling, burning rubber, doing donuts, drifting

Factors unlikely to affect engine longevity...
Whether the engine is a 2016 Ford 5.0 or EcoBoost
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 09:21 AM
  #34  
wileefox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
Default

Thanks everyone for the passionate debate. However I now realize the folly
of my question. There are far too many variables and biases that prevent
me from ever getting the answer to my question. It's like that age old
question, "what is the meaning of life?" Ask a hundred people and you're
likely to get a hundred answers. Climb to the top of the tallest Himalyan
mountain to find the Dalai Lama and you're likely to get no answer there
either.

So here is what I have decided to do. Because I have had such a good
experience with my 2011 5.0 F150 Lariat, (super crew, towing package, 4x4,
5 1/2' bed, I have decided that when I trade, it will be for the same
package in a 2016 model. Or maybe a carry over 2015 depending on the deal
I can get.

One thing is for sure though, after having gone through two GM vehicles
with two transmission replacements and four intake manifold gasket
replacements, all before hitting 100k miles, it's Fords only for me and my
family. Family of five that drives an Escape, an F150, a Focus, an
Explorer, a Mariner and a Taurus.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 09:34 AM
  #35  
130428's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 711
From: Calgary, AB
Default

You'll really be missin' out on the EB though, i feel bad for you...





Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 03:01 PM
  #36  
johndog82's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 235
From: central CA, chevtard country
Default

Originally Posted by TomB985
Truly amazing display of personal bias in this thread. Hardly exclusive to this thread though, I think most people fall into these thinking traps from time to time.

1. It's not MY CHOICE so it's TERRIBLE.

2. Not the most advanced thing on the planet so it's from the stone age.

3. Mine BROKE, so the entire design is TRASH. Every example ever made is a time bomb, and I refuse to accept any evidence that the rest aren't as bad as mine.

There is much closed-mindendess here. Do we all really need to condemn all other choices to make us feel better about ourselves? Most five-year-olds do that, you'd think as grown men we'd be past that.
Exactly; glad someone else besides me is able to wade through the elitist BS. Some folks here would make great politicians.

Last edited by johndog82; Jan 25, 2016 at 03:09 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.