Topic Sponsor
2021+ Ford F150 Discussion of the 14th generation F150.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

2025, which engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 12:29 PM
  #161  
JaseBosto's Avatar
Senior Member
Veteran: Navy
5 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 1,676
From: Somewhere on the south side of Heaven.
Default

Originally Posted by aspade
I wish I hadn’t heard about these.

The exhaust manifolds are a primary fatigue failure point due to thermal cycling between the aluminum cylinder head and the cast iron manifold (or in this case, the manifold is integral to the aluminum head and bolts up to the iron turbo housing). Developing cracking in the manifolds is common across many engine families.

Ford’s bright idea to run coolant through the manifolds – done for the sake of faster warm up for cold start emissions, not turbo protection – means that when those cracks form the symptom isn’t the harmless ticking that you get on any other engine but instead a coolant leak into the exhaust stream where it will shortly poison the cats and O2 sensors.

The cherry on the top of this idiotic design is that what ought to be a wear item that’s a couple hundred bucks and can be swapped out in an afternoon is a complete head replacement at near $4,000 for the part and 25 book hours to put it in.
What in the hell? Point out one documented case of a 2.7 cracked "manifold".....
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 02:23 PM
  #162  
tsigwing's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 640
From: Garland, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by aspade
I wish I hadn’t heard about these.

The exhaust manifolds are a primary fatigue failure point due to thermal cycling between the aluminum cylinder head and the cast iron manifold (or in this case, the manifold is integral to the aluminum head and bolts up to the iron turbo housing). Developing cracking in the manifolds is common across many engine families.

Ford’s bright idea to run coolant through the manifolds – done for the sake of faster warm up for cold start emissions, not turbo protection – means that when those cracks form the symptom isn’t the harmless ticking that you get on any other engine but instead a coolant leak into the exhaust stream where it will shortly poison the cats and O2 sensors.

The cherry on the top of this idiotic design is that what ought to be a wear item that’s a couple hundred bucks and can be swapped out in an afternoon is a complete head replacement at near $4,000 for the part and 25 book hours to put it in.
Sounds like you know what you are talking about. Please provide the statistics of failures among F150's.

Last edited by tsigwing; Dec 17, 2025 at 11:10 AM.
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 04:08 PM
  #163  
ToomanyFTs's Avatar
Senior Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 608
Likes: 274
From: From Down River MI. Now Boulder City, NV
Default

seems like Everybody wants or desires to be an expert, can they tear down an engine and do a repair, I think not in most cases.

It all comes down to real time experience with the engine your truck has and how you drive it

5.0s , I've owned [3], and don't particularly care for that motor, all of mine made strange noises early on.

I've owned [6] EB motors now with no trouble and they make more power when you need it.

If you're not towing regularly or on the throttle heavily [like myself] there is not heavy boost happening, easier on the turbos.

I pulled a 10k lb 5th wheel for 3 years with a 2016 3.5eb. you can't do that with a 5.0

I'm not going to argue with a guy that thinks the 5.0 is the greatest motor in the lineup, because you can't change anyone's mind anyway.

to each is own, buy what you prefer and if you have to ask which motor to buy, you probably have no business buying a truck.

Do the research, check the engine and towing specs and place the order for the truck you desire
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 06:05 PM
  #164  
wkohn's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by JaseBosto
Incorrect. This isnt 1979 anymore bud.
Oh okay. I guess the person I know that went through 3 turbos in 3 years on a 2011 2.7L F150 was imaging it.
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 06:13 PM
  #165  
Super 3.5's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 370
Likes: 281
From: Southern Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by wkohn
Oh okay. I guess the person I know that went through 3 turbos in 3 years on a 2011 2.7L F150 was imaging it.
That's weird. The 2.7 didn't debut until 2015.
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 06:19 PM
  #166  
2008__XL's Avatar
Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 8,974
Likes: 7,504
From: Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by wkohn
Oh okay. I guess the person I know that went through 3 turbos in 3 years on a 2011 2.7L F150 was imaging it.
They sure were since they didn’t offer the 2.7 in 2011.

Even if that was a typo and you meant 2021, you posted nothing proving anything. Where are the links to this, photos, shop paperwork.

On the contrary, there is in fact a post on here about a 2015 2.7 with over 465k original miles. I’ll actually go ahead and post a link: https://www.f150forum.com/f118/465-0...-2-7-a-389552/

Not sure why people like you try so hard to badmouth the turbo stuff.
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 09:18 PM
  #167  
artsr2002's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 14,631
Likes: 8,822
From: My House
Default

Epic thread is full of epicness.

Keep it goin' fellers...


Old Dec 15, 2025 | 10:29 PM
  #168  
BadAV's Avatar
No fart cans allowed
10 Year Member
Photoriffic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 2,366
From: MO
Default

Originally Posted by wkohn
Oh okay. I guess the person I know that went through 3 turbos in 3 years on a 2011 2.7L F150 was imaging it.
10 year member with 4 posts. Nothing fishy here at all...
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 11:28 PM
  #169  
PaulG150's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 16
Likes: 7
From: Kennebunk Maine
Default

My 2.7 turbo runs just fine at 133,000. It does eat spark plugs about every 10,000 since it pasted 100,000. The glass insulator just breaks apart and the engine runs very rough.
Has anyone else had this problem with the 2.7 turbo? My truck is a 2016 F150.
Old Dec 16, 2025 | 12:08 AM
  #170  
Mark Miller's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,030
Likes: 1,087
Default

Originally Posted by wkohn
Oh okay. I guess the person I know that went through 3 turbos in 3 years on a 2011 2.7L F150 was imaging it.
He must have been imagining since like others said the 2.7 Eco Boost didn't come out until 2015 in the F-150's like others have said!! You might want to check Your facts and learn how to spell before making Yourself look like a Fool on the Internet!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.