Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How Ford Treats the Coyote.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2016, 04:38 PM
  #311  
Senior Member
 
SS308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 132
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ROCNROL


You're never too old to ROCNROL





SWEET! I use to have the original Boss 302. Wish I still had it...
The following users liked this post:
ROCNROL (07-13-2016)
Old 07-13-2016, 05:00 PM
  #312  
Platinum R.R.
 
Platinum T.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 483
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DannyboyUpstate
I came from Volkswagen land before this. I was completely smitten to get back to a regular V8 engine. I was running from turbochargers, egr/direct injection/high pressure fuel pump issues. The whole way vehicles are being sold now just turns me off. Every 5 years they expect you to buy another one. I'm just not that kind of car owner. I don't want to own an ecoboost that needs wastegate control valves, timing chains, and a valve cleaning at 105k miles, so might as well trade it in...

Maybe the 5.0 isn't the greatest engine suited to a truck, but in the 3 weeks I've owned mine, it's more than impressed me. I'm excited to do some towing with it and see how the 3.55 rear end works with the rest of the driveline.
I saw on the Internet in 2018 F150's, with the New 5.0 will have Twin Turbos putting out 450 Horses.
Don't purchase a Honda, Timing Belt over 100?,000 miles
You can still purchase V-8's in F150's if you want one. May be an older F150. They are still out there.
Look on Used Car Lots.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:06 PM
  #313  
Platinum R.R.
 
Platinum T.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 483
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gene Hunt
Except real world fuel economy from the 3.5 EB is no better. The Ford GT is evidence of where their heart really is. Car should have had a super charged Voodoo. Weber carb'd 289's, 427's, super charged DOHC 5.4 and now a 3.5EB.
I believe Super Charger and Turbo's are two different animals.
Turbo's use extra exhaust gas, Super Chargers are Gear driven.
If I'm wrong someone will let you know.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:30 PM
  #314  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Gene Hunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: South Texas
Posts: 319
Received 87 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Platium T.C.
I believe Super Charger and Turbo's are two different animals.
Turbo's use extra exhaust gas, Super Chargers are Gear driven.
If I'm wrong someone will let you know.
Turbos are driven by the engines exhaust, some exhaust bypassed internally to limit boost.
Super Chargers are usually belt driven.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:34 PM
  #315  
Junior Member
 
f150@cherrys.net's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DannyboyUpstate
I came from Volkswagen land before this. I was completely smitten to get back to a regular V8 engine. I was running from turbochargers, egr/direct injection/high pressure fuel pump issues. The whole way vehicles are being sold now just turns me off. Every 5 years they expect you to buy another one. I'm just not that kind of car owner. I don't want to own an ecoboost that needs wastegate control valves, timing chains, and a valve cleaning at 105k miles, so might as well trade it in...

Maybe the 5.0 isn't the greatest engine suited to a truck, but in the 3 weeks I've owned mine, it's more than impressed me. I'm excited to do some towing with it and see how the 3.55 rear end works with the rest of the driveline.
Wait till they all have to replace that twin turbo at 5gs they will want their v8 back.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:38 PM
  #316  
Junior Member
 
Outpost Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Canal Fulton, OH
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My problem with the EB engines is that turbo chargers (and superchargers) add extra heat to the engine. That will tap the longevity over time. I've had my '13 F150 XLT with the 5.0 for only six months. It seems to do well with the 5000lb boat. I've always believed the axiom "There's no replacement for displacement" when it come to low end grunt. Pulling a 5000# boat up a 15 degree ramp from a dead stop requires low end grunt!
Old 07-13-2016, 05:47 PM
  #317  
Junior Member
 
f150@cherrys.net's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very happy with my 2010 supercrew 4.6 v8 and I love the 20.5 mpg avg I get on the highway. Sweet spot at 68 miles/hour. at about 83,000 miles. I did have to have the oil solenoids replaced at about 60k. The only other problem I have had is the vacuum 4wd system. I had to have three front hubs replaced because of water in the system, Ford finally agreed with me and replaced the solenoid and hose. Kind of scary having one hub engage at 70 miles an hour and grind like hell. Ford payed for all my repairs.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:49 PM
  #318  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,009
Received 3,935 Likes on 2,510 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Outpost Jim
My problem with the EB engines is that turbo chargers (and superchargers) add extra heat to the engine. That will tap the longevity over time. I've had my '13 F150 XLT with the 5.0 for only six months. It seems to do well with the 5000lb boat. I've always believed the axiom "There's no replacement for displacement" when it come to low end grunt. Pulling a 5000# boat up a 15 degree ramp from a dead stop requires low end grunt!
You ain't gonna beat forced induction in that area.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:54 PM
  #319  
Senior Member
 
LSchicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,300
Received 197 Likes on 150 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NASSTY
You ain't gonna beat forced induction in that area.
True, and the bigger the better. That's why we love boosting v8's.
Old 07-13-2016, 05:59 PM
  #320  
Junior Member
 
kscoggins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kscoggins
I am not too happy with my 2011 Coyote right now. It is at the dealer right now to see why it has burned nearly 2 qts of oil in the last 200 miles.

I am fearful that with 95k miles on it, it has a broke ring or some other catastrophic failure.

I searched the forum and all I could find is some 5.0's using a little oil between oil changes, mostly in the first 30k.

As of recently, if my truck sits idling for 5 minutes it will start smoking and rolls a cloud of blue smoke when you step on it after a long idle....

Well local fraud dealer says $8200 for a new engine, the engine in my truck has "Internal Damage". Tech said he thought it was maybe a bad oil ring but not sure. He thought the compression was fine, but when I asked him if any plugs were oil foiled he said he didn't know.........

So $95 for them to drive it down the road and tell me it still has plenty of power but it is burning too much oil.......... No SH** Sherlock !!


Really FORD !?!?!?!?!


Quick Reply: How Ford Treats the Coyote.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 AM.