Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Does runnin 93 instead of 87 . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 11:17 AM
  #1  
juanvaldez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 333
Likes: 110
Default Does runnin 93 instead of 87 . . .

in the 5.0 give more hp? Yes, a little. Did some testing with the Dragy. Running 93 instead of 87 gave me 0.2 - 0.3 seconds better 0 - 60. Tried to keep it apples to apples running the same place, time of day, launch, etc.

Truck is '19 F150 XL std cab, 8' bed, 5.0, 4x4, 3.55, 10 sp with around 21k. Best 0 - 60 was 6.23
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 12:24 PM
  #2  
MotorsportsAustin's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 279
Likes: 54
From: San Mateo County, Kalifornia
Default

I get a bit better MPG's, not sure if it's enough to justify spending extra $0.30 per gallon though.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 12:28 PM
  #3  
timd38's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 129
Likes: 54
From: Hudson WI
Default

My wife's Ecoboost get better mileage and performance with premium, but her 2.0 Ecoboost does not get the mileage of my 5.0 S550 Mustang on 93. I don't notice any difference in mileage on my 5.0 F150.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 01:36 PM
  #4  
juanvaldez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 333
Likes: 110
Default

Too many variables for me to determine if I am getting better mileage or not. Without the Dragy the difference in performance would not be noticeable.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 04:22 PM
  #5  
w00t692's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 613
From: Louisiana
Default

Yes, running 93 in the 18+ 5.0 or ANY year 3.5 ecoboost or 2.7 ecoboost picks up horsepower over running 87. The ecu allows more timing.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
Rolling Thunder's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 915
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by juanvaldez
in the 5.0 give more hp? Yes, a little. Did some testing with the Dragy. Running 93 instead of 87 gave me 0.2 - 0.3 seconds better 0 - 60. Tried to keep it apples to apples running the same place, time of day, launch, etc.

Truck is '19 F150 XL std cab, 8' bed, 5.0, 4x4, 3.55, 10 sp with around 21k. Best 0 - 60 was 6.23
What did you check your 0-60 with and HP with?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 05:08 PM
  #7  
techietruckguy's Avatar
Senior Member
Supporting Member

10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 231
Likes: 30
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

Try some 100 octane and report back to us.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 05:11 PM
  #8  
Scott2373's Avatar
2018 XLT FX4
Supporting Member

10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 715
From: Maricopa, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by MotorsportsAustin
I get a bit better MPG's, not sure if it's enough to justify spending extra $0.30 per gallon though.
Same here, but it's closer to $.80 difference between Regular and High test, around here. With Regular I can get about 500-520 miles out of a tank. With the 93, I'll get about 550 miles. Not worth it at all!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 05:22 PM
  #9  
blkZ28spt's Avatar
Senior Member
Supporting Member

5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 8,731
Likes: 4,800
Default

Originally Posted by Rolling Thunder
What did you check your 0-60 with and HP with?
It's in the post you quoted, he used dragy, which is very accurate on verified runs.

The owner's manual doesn't lie, for optimal vehicle and engine performance, an octane of 91 or higher is needed. Depending on where you live probably E85 is the choice for the 5.0 from what I gather and 91-93 for the EcoBoosts.

You won't make up the price difference on the slight increase in fuel mileage, and should run acceptably on 87. Also as the manual says, the hotter is it and the harder you work the engine, the bigger the difference of higher octane.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 05:51 PM
  #10  
Rolling Thunder's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 915
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
It's in the post you quoted, he used dragy, which is very accurate on verified runs.

The owner's manual doesn't lie, for optimal vehicle and engine performance, an octane of 91 or higher is needed. Depending on where you live probably E85 is the choice for the 5.0 from what I gather and 91-93 for the EcoBoosts.

You won't make up the price difference on the slight increase in fuel mileage, and should run acceptably on 87. Also as the manual says, the hotter is it and the harder you work the engine, the bigger the difference of higher octane.
I've never heard of this product and was skeptical until I saw the "tree" lights! I've seen guys use a stopwatch which for accuracy is only approximate until they get to the track and use the 'tree" and become disillusioned about their true times..

I use a top-tier fuel like the manual 'suggests' and mix 87 and 93 at the pump to get ~ 91 octane 36 gal. tank (~ a 45-55% mix is close). I'm a 100% believer in what the owner's manual tells me..
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.