Does runnin 93 instead of 87 . . .
in the 5.0 give more hp? Yes, a little. Did some testing with the Dragy. Running 93 instead of 87 gave me 0.2 - 0.3 seconds better 0 - 60. Tried to keep it apples to apples running the same place, time of day, launch, etc.
Truck is '19 F150 XL std cab, 8' bed, 5.0, 4x4, 3.55, 10 sp with around 21k. Best 0 - 60 was 6.23
Truck is '19 F150 XL std cab, 8' bed, 5.0, 4x4, 3.55, 10 sp with around 21k. Best 0 - 60 was 6.23
My wife's Ecoboost get better mileage and performance with premium, but her 2.0 Ecoboost does not get the mileage of my 5.0 S550 Mustang on 93. I don't notice any difference in mileage on my 5.0 F150.
in the 5.0 give more hp? Yes, a little. Did some testing with the Dragy. Running 93 instead of 87 gave me 0.2 - 0.3 seconds better 0 - 60. Tried to keep it apples to apples running the same place, time of day, launch, etc.
Truck is '19 F150 XL std cab, 8' bed, 5.0, 4x4, 3.55, 10 sp with around 21k. Best 0 - 60 was 6.23
Truck is '19 F150 XL std cab, 8' bed, 5.0, 4x4, 3.55, 10 sp with around 21k. Best 0 - 60 was 6.23
Trending Topics
Same here, but it's closer to $.80 difference between Regular and High test, around here. With Regular I can get about 500-520 miles out of a tank. With the 93, I'll get about 550 miles. Not worth it at all!
It's in the post you quoted, he used dragy, which is very accurate on verified runs.
The owner's manual doesn't lie, for optimal vehicle and engine performance, an octane of 91 or higher is needed. Depending on where you live probably E85 is the choice for the 5.0 from what I gather and 91-93 for the EcoBoosts.
You won't make up the price difference on the slight increase in fuel mileage, and should run acceptably on 87. Also as the manual says, the hotter is it and the harder you work the engine, the bigger the difference of higher octane.
The owner's manual doesn't lie, for optimal vehicle and engine performance, an octane of 91 or higher is needed. Depending on where you live probably E85 is the choice for the 5.0 from what I gather and 91-93 for the EcoBoosts.
You won't make up the price difference on the slight increase in fuel mileage, and should run acceptably on 87. Also as the manual says, the hotter is it and the harder you work the engine, the bigger the difference of higher octane.
It's in the post you quoted, he used dragy, which is very accurate on verified runs.
The owner's manual doesn't lie, for optimal vehicle and engine performance, an octane of 91 or higher is needed. Depending on where you live probably E85 is the choice for the 5.0 from what I gather and 91-93 for the EcoBoosts.
You won't make up the price difference on the slight increase in fuel mileage, and should run acceptably on 87. Also as the manual says, the hotter is it and the harder you work the engine, the bigger the difference of higher octane.
The owner's manual doesn't lie, for optimal vehicle and engine performance, an octane of 91 or higher is needed. Depending on where you live probably E85 is the choice for the 5.0 from what I gather and 91-93 for the EcoBoosts.
You won't make up the price difference on the slight increase in fuel mileage, and should run acceptably on 87. Also as the manual says, the hotter is it and the harder you work the engine, the bigger the difference of higher octane.
I use a top-tier fuel like the manual 'suggests' and mix 87 and 93 at the pump to get ~ 91 octane 36 gal. tank (~ a 45-55% mix is close). I'm a 100% believer in what the owner's manual tells me..










