Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Differences vs competition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2016 | 12:29 PM
  #1  
cransnam's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Default Differences vs competition

What key factors made you choose ford over the others?
one question of mine, does the ford have more room in the cab than even a mega cab dodge?
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 12:48 PM
  #2  
BlackBoost's Avatar
Blunt
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 1,086
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

The 2.7 EcoBoost made my decision. Plus I liked the interior, panoramic moonroof and dash controls the most compared to the others.
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
Sysop's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 268
Likes: 67
Default

http://www.autoevolution.com/news/fo...uck-74652.html

https://media.ford.com/content/fordm...-features.html
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 12:58 PM
  #4  
Tystevens's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 313
Likes: 41
From: SLC, Utah
Default

Ecoboost brought me in. I do like how spacious the supercrew, too.

No, I don't think that the Ford has more room than the megacab. Particularly behind the seat. Those are massive.
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 01:00 PM
  #5  
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 679
From: midwest
Default

Size of crew cab interior (I'm a very wide 6'5" with tall kids/wife).

Mpg to power ratio.

Reliability

Value
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
Aj06bolt12r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 590
Likes: 190
From: Middle Tennessee
Default

Towing ability / price ratio did it for me. I was on the fence about getting a GMC with the 6.2 and 8 spd trans but that engine combo is only available in the top trim level trucks. I didn't want to pay all the extra money for leather, heated seats, navigation, sunroof ect. just to get the most capable engine for towing. So GM was out.

I was also very interested in the Ram Ecodiesel. I shopped them against Ford but they were not willing to negotiate on price and value my trade in as highly as Ford did so I passed on them as well. Plus the Ecodiesel is under powered compared to the Ecoboost or the 6.2 GM. I also didn't want to deal with all of the potential emissions equipment B.S. that modern diesels are hindered with.

Ford had the giant super crew, the towing beast of an engine in the 3.5 eco and they had the XLT's priced right. When I found a dealer willing to do 10k off of MSRP out the door and to match NADA value on my trade I pulled the trigger.

11,000 miles since I bought it in November. Lots of that is towing. It does great. My only real complaint is a deceleration vibration between 40 and 50 miles per hour. Only does it when you are coasting at those speeds. I have not been motivated enough to drop it off at the dealer to get this looked at yet.
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 02:08 PM
  #7  
Indy2015's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 951
Likes: 222
From: Western Washington
Default

Just comparing engineering and build quality while on the lot made me go with Ford. I considered Ram for about a week, but decided against them after seeing the flimsy suspension components compared to ford and GM.

Stopped by a GM lot before I got my ford, and 4 out of 10 trucks had the power steering pressure hose riding hard against the power steering reservoir. I could see how it happened. Tightening up the pressure hose without holding it in place would push it up against the reservoir, but I just wondered what other things were discrepant that I couldn't see. And that was in plain sight.

You go to any harsh environment, and the fleet vehicle of choice is Ford, even though they may be slightly more expensive to buy than the competition.
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 02:09 PM
  #8  
2011XLT5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 507
Likes: 134
From: Harlingen, TX
Default

Marketing
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 02:16 PM
  #9  
Cody2006's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 245
Likes: 20
Default

Interior, MPG,Aluminum(hoping no corrosion/less compared to steel here in northeast winters). 2.7L turbo is awesome. Handles like a car/rides like a truck and fun of a mustang. Start/stop great at drive-thrus with long wait times for gas mileage.

Ford truck fan to start, but definitely like styling and all the features/updates better than competition. RAM would be second choice, Chevy interior needs a refresh for me. Engines/transmission combo on my cousins 14' silverado 6.2L isn't that great unless it was running high RPM (lots of added interior noise) sluggish shifting, ecoboost is way better IMO.
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 02:36 PM
  #10  
turbojamie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 295
Likes: 61
Default

Price was #1 vs GM that I have had my entire life
Ecoboost engine was another
Fords Tech package I was really impressed with the sync 2 MFT.

I am not totally impressed with the sync 3 in my 2016.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 PM.