Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport
View Poll Results: How many of you have utilized the SYNC3 update?
Upgraded
627
69.05%
Choosing to wait for Ford
281
30.95%
Voters: 908. You may not vote on this poll

Current SYNC 3 and CarPlay/Android Auto Information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 07:07 PM
  #331  
thematrixhazuneo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by tbinmd
The ports are still the same smart ports for charging. I haven't seen a difference in charge rate with my phone. The ports can supply up to 2 amps, but it depends on the device connecting. It sounds like if the negotiation fails the ports just provide .5 amps.
Originally Posted by DanMc85
From service manual:

The USB hub allows for various audio devices to play content through the vehicle speakers. The USB hub contains one or two USB port(s), depending on the vehicle equipment. If the vehicle is equipped with a remote USB port, the USB hub contains one USB port. If the vehicle is not equipped with a remote USB port, the USB hub contains two USB ports.


Data is sent from the USB hub and remote USB port (if equipped) to the APIM through the USB hub-to- APIM USB cable. Although there are multiple USB ports in the system, there is only one cable connecting the USB hub to the APIM.


The USB hub receives voltage and ground through dedicated circuits from the APIM. The USB ports can be used to power and/or charge a device if the device supports this feature and does not have a power consumption requirement of more than approximately 5V and 2.5A (about 13 watts).
Thanks for the info!
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 07:10 PM
  #332  
jm061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 649
Default

Originally Posted by DanMc85
It's funny how bad people want this feature, but once they have it they will release how plain and lame it is... In a month most will never touch Carplay again lol. Android Auto is a little nicer. But I suppose both of these are just my opinion. lol
I am actually surprised at the demand by those who have NAV. I certainly understand those without NAV wanting it though.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 07:10 PM
  #333  
DanMc85's Avatar
The Source
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 403
Likes: 247
From: New England, USA
Default

Originally Posted by thematrixhazuneo
Thanks for the info!
You're welcome... no problem.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 07:12 PM
  #334  
DanMc85's Avatar
The Source
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 403
Likes: 247
From: New England, USA
Default

Originally Posted by jm061
I am actually surprised at the demand by those who have NAV. I certainly understand those without NAV wanting it though.
Agreed... its a cheap $55 option for those without Nav to get phone based Nav.

I think Android Auto will be nice once Waze finally gets released for it. Which they said will happen since Google now owns Waze.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 07:35 PM
  #335  
Madcap57's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 577
Likes: 121
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by DanMc85
Agreed... its a cheap $55 option for those without Nav to get phone based Nav.

I think Android Auto will be nice once Waze finally gets released for it. Which they said will happen since Google now owns Waze.
Yes, I am actually a beta tester for Waze also...google is holding them back from releasing the test version of AA and the test version of Waze for AA... Expect it around Jan-Mar though.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 07:44 PM
  #336  
didiasku's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 32
Likes: 7
From: ohio
Default

Originally Posted by DanMc85
Agreed... its a cheap $55 option for those without Nav to get phone based Nav.

I think Android Auto will be nice once Waze finally gets released for it. Which they said will happen since Google now owns Waze.
As an Android user, with a 2016 XLT, and no NAV I anxiously await the day my wife stops saying "stop looking at your phone"

Plus I assume other app developers are awaiting 2.x to do more integration.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 09:01 PM
  #337  
remltr's Avatar
Old Fart
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 312
From: Mesquite NV
Default

Originally Posted by jm061
I am actually surprised at the demand by those who have NAV. I certainly understand those without NAV wanting it though.
I have nav and for me personally I think the nav leaves a lot to be desired. I use a garmin nuvi in its place. I am an iphone user so will be looking forward to car play, but not necessarily for any nav capability. I am hoping that car play will be less issue oriented for my audio purposes than sync 3.

For the $50+ cost of the hub, which arrived today btw, I am willing to experiment and hope it works out.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 09:14 PM
  #338  
NCRedneck's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 50
Default

I've been lurking for a while. Android auto is something I am looking forward to. As an IT guy I'd rather they delay it and get it right than rush to production and have a mess.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 09:37 PM
  #339  
joseph07081's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 38
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by NCRedneck
I've been lurking for a while. Android auto is something I am looking forward to. As an IT guy I'd rather they delay it and get it right than rush to production and have a mess.
Another IT guy and I agree. Having said that I ordered my new hub today,which the dealer told me was on nationwide backorder. I figure by the time I get the hub, the update may be out and the bug reports will have started coming in.
Old Dec 12, 2016 | 09:40 PM
  #340  
fafafooey's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 196
Likes: 37
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by jm061
Already have a couple testers. Watch for updates.
This is how Ford handles beta testing? Exchanging software and reporting back to Ford on issues via PM's on a forum?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.