Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Best engine combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 02:43 PM
  #1  
Dentonramsey52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default Best engine combo

Looking to buy a 2014-2018 4wd ext cab or crew cab f150 in the next week do I go 2.7 3.5 or 5.0 I don’t pull trailers I drive a lot of free way models and spend a lot of time hunting on rough mountain roads
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 02:50 PM
  #2  
icantdrive55's Avatar
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 532
From: The Great Midwest, aka, Flyover Country
Default

2.7 would be my choice given your description of use. Best performance plus fuel economy. 3.5 and 5.0 are overkill for your needs. I'd recommend springing for the newer 10-spd model ('17 and up?) if you can afford it, although there's nothing wrong with the performance of the 6-spd. One thing I would see if I can find to handle those off-road situations is the e-locker rear diff, available on the 3.55 and 3.73 ratio axles.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 02:52 PM
  #3  
Dentonramsey52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by icantdrive55
2.7 would be my choice given your description of use. Best performance plus fuel economy. 3.5 and 5.0 are overkill for your needs. I'd recommend springing for the newer 10-spd model ('17 and up?) if you can afford it, although there's nothing wrong with the performance of the 6-spd. One thing I would see if I can find to handle those off-road situations is the e-locker rear diff, available on the 3.55 and 3.73 ratio axles.
thanks for the response yeah I definitely want the e locker the last Ford I owned was an 01 so I’m trying to figure the best options and the ones to stay away from
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 02:53 PM
  #4  
mmull's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 52
Likes: 7
From: Dallas
Default

I have a 2015 2.7 4x4 and love the hell out of it, I have not had a single issue with it other that regular maintenance with 52,000 miles. I pulled a trailer from Oregon back to Texas and could not complain, I cannot speak for everyone but I would buy another 2.7 if I decided to trade mine in.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 03:00 PM
  #5  
DyLivn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 500
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I don't do much towing and I drive mostly on main roads and highways. I still wen't with the 3.5 TT because it makes a **** ton of power and the truck is blast to drive because of it. If you like performance, it or the 5.0 are must haves. I also get 26 mpg on flat highway with cruise set on 60mph.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 03:03 PM
  #6  
Dentonramsey52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by icantdrive55
2.7 would be my choice given your description of use. Best performance plus fuel economy. 3.5 and 5.0 are overkill for your needs. I'd recommend springing for the newer 10-spd model ('17 and up?) if you can afford it, although there's nothing wrong with the performance of the 6-spd. One thing I would see if I can find to handle those off-road situations is the e-locker rear diff, available on the 3.55 and 3.73 ratio axles.
thats why I’m leaning towards the 3.5 I wouldn’t mind the options the 5.0 gives you as far as the performance mods but when i test drove them I lovvvved the way the 3.5 felt
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 03:07 PM
  #7  
tvsjr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 2,604
Default

Define "best". If you're chasing MPGs, 2.7EB. If you want lots of zoom-zoom and don't want to spend a ton of money modifying, 3.5EB. If you want the ultimate in zoom-zoom and don't mind dropping 10K for a Whipple, 5.0.

I have two 3.5EBs in my driveway, one of which replaced a previous 3.5EB... so I'm biased.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 03:28 PM
  #8  
RA050624's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 511
Likes: 165
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

3.5
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 03:46 PM
  #9  
TexasRedfish's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 262
Default

I had a 2016 with a 2.7 and now a 2018 with a 3.5.

According to butt dyno, the 2.7 accelerated faster or at least felt more responsive. The 3.5 had more top-end which was why I wanted a 3.5 when going to a 2018. I do alot of hwy passing and the 3.5 just pulls all the way thru. The 2.7 kind of dies out after 80ish. Note, it still pulls, just not as hard as the 3.5. My wife has an Explorer with the 3.5 Eco and thats how I realized the top-end on the 3.5.

And according to the lie-o-meter, im getting the same mileage in both at 19.3 - 19.5. Both trucks have the same wheel/tire setup (transferred from the 2016 to 2018). Maybe the 10spd in the 2018 helped out compared to the 6spd on the 2016.

Never ran a 5.0 in the F150. Do run a 5.0 in my brother's stang with a paxton/pulleys/full bolt ons, tune, etc. That thing is nasty lol.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 04:10 PM
  #10  
DyLivn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 500
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by TexasRedfish
I had a 2016 with a 2.7 and now a 2018 with a 3.5.

According to butt dyno, the 2.7 accelerated faster or at least felt more responsive. The 3.5 had more top-end which was why I wanted a 3.5 when going to a 2018. I do alot of hwy passing and the 3.5 just pulls all the way thru. The 2.7 kind of dies out after 80ish. Note, it still pulls, just not as hard as the 3.5. My wife has an Explorer with the 3.5 Eco and thats how I realized the top-end on the 3.5.

And according to the lie-o-meter, im getting the same mileage in both at 19.3 - 19.5. Both trucks have the same wheel/tire setup (transferred from the 2016 to 2018). Maybe the 10spd in the 2018 helped out compared to the 6spd on the 2016.

Never ran a 5.0 in the F150. Do run a 5.0 in my brother's stang with a paxton/pulleys/full bolt ons, tune, etc. That thing is nasty lol.
I got a 2.7 as a loaner it immediately felt slower to me even down low, but man you are right the Gen 2 3.5 past 40-50 is a freaking rocket.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.