Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Towing with previous generations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2018, 11:05 AM
  #21  
Blunt
 
BlackBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,034
Received 1,074 Likes on 722 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by montanaman
We are so spoiled by our modern trucks.

Lets go back to 1979 - we had 351M and 400M engines that made like 154hp and 158 hp. And they got about 10mpg.

If you were pulling a heavy trailer it would be foot-to-the floor on any long hills, and the old man would tell me to let up on it and let it slow down, or I'd "knock the rods out of it".

The only current engine I'm not sold on, is the 2.7 eco, and I can't prove it, but I think they are really overworked.
Haha yep, watching the temperature rise on the gauge and being like "It's ok, it's AT the red but not quite IN the red. Keep on going...."
Old 07-19-2018, 05:08 PM
  #22  
FORD lifer
 
montanaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Quad Cities - relocated from Montana
Posts: 1,232
Received 246 Likes on 185 Posts

Default

Maybe I'm just thinking about using the right tool for the job.

In 2011, the mantra on the ecoboost was "V8 power, V6 mileage", and I was skeptical then, because putting twin turbos on it will give it lots of power, but more power takes more fuel, unless FOMOCO has repealed the law of physics.
Old 07-19-2018, 06:01 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Wesley416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 97
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

This is a point that I'm struggling and juggling right now I'm thinking of "upgrading" for my 2010 5.4 3v screw to a 18 2.7l screw I tow a ~4000lb boat regularly and my 5.4 gets it done in hindsight I would have got 3.55 or 3.73 gears if I had it to do over again but at the time I bought it the 3.31 made sense I'm not gonna lift or throw bigger heavier rubber at it so it didnt matter then. I just wonder how much better if at all the 2.7 will tow that with its numbers being so close to my 5.4. but it would be nice to have some of the features my truck lacks ie back up cam, heated seats.
Old 07-19-2018, 06:02 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
mass-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,969
Received 918 Likes on 694 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by montanaman


I say that because it’s (The 2.7) is a teeny 165 ci engine placed in a 6000 lb vehicle. That thing is working it’s butt off just to get away from a stop sign, much less towing.

Im sure the engine exists to help with CAFE standards, and that it will run fine for a while. But I wouldn’t have one, and if I did I wouldn’t be towing anything heavier than a ATV trailer with it. They are not Cummins Cargomaster Diesels

Most 2.7's are in 5200 lb or lighter trucks. You cannot get them in a supercrew 6.5' bed with 4x4 and not above a lariat trim. A guy on the other forum weighed his XLT 4x4 crew cab with a few hundred lbs of tools in a bed box and it was 5340 lbs.

Plus, the 2.7 is making less HP and torque than the 3.5 but it is distributed over the same number of cylinders. Its also in a CGI block like the powerstokes. If anything its less stressed.

Last edited by mass-hole; 07-19-2018 at 06:13 PM.
Old 07-19-2018, 06:12 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
mass-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,969
Received 918 Likes on 694 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wesley416
This is a point that I'm struggling and juggling right now I'm thinking of "upgrading" for my 2010 5.4 3v screw to a 18 2.7l screw I tow a ~4000lb boat regularly and my 5.4 gets it done in hindsight I would have got 3.55 or 3.73 gears if I had it to do over again but at the time I bought it the 3.31 made sense I'm not gonna lift or throw bigger heavier rubber at it so it didnt matter then. I just wonder how much better if at all the 2.7 will tow that with its numbers being so close to my 5.4. but it would be nice to have some of the features my truck lacks ie back up cam, heated seats.
It will tow better. its more torque at a lower RPM. and for a 4000 lb boat you dont need a whole lot of HP so the 2.7 will be more than enough there.

The big benefit will be the unloaded gas mileage, it should be substanitally better than the 5.4.
The following users liked this post:
Wesley416 (07-19-2018)
Old 07-19-2018, 07:34 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
jcb206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,406
Received 238 Likes on 165 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mass-hole
It will tow better. its more torque at a lower RPM. and for a 4000 lb boat you dont need a whole lot of HP so the 2.7 will be more than enough there.

The big benefit will be the unloaded gas mileage, it should be substanitally better than the 5.4.
X2.

If a 4,000 lb boat is the heaviest you will tow, the 2.7 is for you.
Old 07-22-2018, 01:43 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Mark Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,262
Received 769 Likes on 524 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by montanaman


I say that because it’s (The 2.7) is a teeny 165 ci engine placed in a 6000 lb vehicle. That thing is working it’s butt off just to get away from a stop sign, much less towing.

Im sure the engine exists to help with CAFE standards, and that it will run fine for a while. But I wouldn’t have one, and if I did I wouldn’t be towing anything heavier than a ATV trailer with it. They are not Cummins Cargomaster Diesels

Which F-150 with a 2.7L Eco Boost weighs 6,000 lbs[none of them]?The Raptors the heaviest F-150 don't weigh 6,000 lbs!!A guy on here has posted almost 200,000 miles on a 2.7L Eco Boost with no problems!!!You should really go drive a 2.7L Eco Boost truck before putting them down?You wouldn't tow anything heavier than a ATV trailer with one?Wow you really are miss informed IMO!!That 2.7L Eco Boost will out tow many larger N/A V-8 engines!!
Old 07-22-2018, 05:56 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
E. Manuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 509
Received 100 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

If the 2.7L is so tough and powerful, why can't you get one in HDPP trucks?
Old 07-22-2018, 07:33 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
jcb206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,406
Received 238 Likes on 165 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by E. Manuel
If the 2.7L is so tough and powerful, why can't you get one in HDPP trucks?
The same reason you can’t get a Platinum with the HDPP. Ford wants you to upgrade. If you want a HDPP, you have to opt for the more expensive 5.0 and 3.5. If you want a Platinum with your Payload, then you need a SuperDuty. If you want Ecoboost power in a SuperDuty, you have to buy a diesel.

The 2.7 EB can Tow 8k. To tow 8k you need Payload. If the HDPP was available with the 2.7 EB I would buy one.
Old 07-22-2018, 08:31 AM
  #30  
Member
 
Wesley416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 97
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Holy crap what a difference i drove a 2018 f150 xlt 302a with the 2.7 3.55 rear an sport package the wife an i will definitely be getting one the power an acceleration difference from my current rig is mind blowing now to sell my current truck an cook up a deal thanks for all yalls input that is quite an impressive combo


Quick Reply: Towing with previous generations?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 PM.