Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

13.8 mpg, time for a tune up.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2007, 11:27 AM
  #11  
Ty
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Ty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minocqua Wi
Posts: 6,986
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

It was about 15 when I got it, and now about 13.
Old 05-20-2007, 12:11 PM
  #12  
Member
 
claviz13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ty
well, after 13.8 on my last tank, I think its time fr a tune up...

I am thinking about cleaning the MAF sensor, new plugs wires, and coils, and???

I am basically just looking for sugestions, and any parts you reccomend

and my truck is not coil on plug.

Finally, can someone give me a part number for the evap thing that is up on the throttle body?

truck is a 1998 4.6 with about 96k on it.
13.8mpg isn't bad at all for a Ford.
Old 05-20-2007, 12:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
spdkilz02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

especially considering all the bad gas that we are getting right now.

though my truck is getting alot better, when i got it i was getting about 15, now that it has just about 4K miles on it im getting around 18.
Old 05-20-2007, 12:35 PM
  #14  
08 February TOTM
 
whitecrystal1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dumfries, VA Member: #77
Posts: 3,184
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

When was the last time the 02 sensor was changed? They say they should be replaced every 60 - 70K miles? That may help restore a lot of what you've lost. Are you driving any different? My 02 did a little better, probably where you once were and I would get around 19 on the hwy. Most of mine was hwy though.
13.8 isn't that bad IF your not mixing it with any hwy. I'm mostly only city with my 05 (5.4) and it gets low 13's very low sometimes 12
Old 05-20-2007, 12:40 PM
  #15  
Ty
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Ty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minocqua Wi
Posts: 6,986
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

it was about half and half on the last tank, thats why I thought about a tune up in the first place.

where is the spot where you run the seafoam through? Isnt it the brake booster line or something?
Old 05-20-2007, 01:07 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
spdkilz02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i wonder if the 3.55 rear end would make much for a better gas mileage? cuz im about half and half on driving and still get about 17-18 and do drive aggressive at times.
Old 05-20-2007, 01:12 PM
  #17  
08 February TOTM
 
whitecrystal1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dumfries, VA Member: #77
Posts: 3,184
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spdkilz02
i wonder if the 3.55 rear end would make much for a better gas mileage? cuz im about half and half on driving and still get about 17-18 and do drive aggressive at times.
about 15% better I think
Old 05-21-2007, 10:47 AM
  #18  
Member
 
claviz13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whitecrystal1
about 15% better I think
15%?? I'm sure if changing the gears in our trucks would result in 15% better fuel mileage we would all be doing it. Maybe 1-2% if your lucky.
Old 05-21-2007, 11:03 AM
  #19  
08 February TOTM
 
whitecrystal1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dumfries, VA Member: #77
Posts: 3,184
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Probably not, but 15% isn't all that much anyways. I would have to think it's more than 1 or 2% though.



Quick Reply: 13.8 mpg, time for a tune up.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 PM.