Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2012 ecoboost engine blow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2014 | 12:51 AM
  #171  
alpinestar1123's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 152
From: Burbank CA
Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
It is true that I have partaken of the two gear kick down turbo boosted rush...maybe more than once.............maybe more than twice....it IS addicting.
Oh yea my 6.2 barks the gears lllllooovvveee it its even better when its the 2015 chevys that i leave in my mirrors
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 11:11 AM
  #172  
Aboostedf150's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 142
Likes: 22
From: houston,tx
Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
Originally Posted by packplantpath View Post
By definition, getting more power out of less size is pushing it more. There are lots of ways to accomplish this. Forced induction, timing adjustments, valve timing, more valves, higher rpm limit, direct injection, compression ratio changes, and more I'm sure. It is not some simple physical law. It is the result of complex failure engineering analysis and design. Otherwise modern engines would be junk.


And, Ford has used all or most of these to generate the performance of the EB.
I am old enough to remember when getting 1 HP per cubic inch out of a stock, streetable engine was an amazing engineering feat. Hotrodders who got any more than that usually had a cruddy running, low mpg, time bomb under their hoods.
The OEM EB, as produced by Ford makes over 2 lb/ft of torque per cubic inch and makes over 1.7 HP per cubic inch........This engine -- stock as a rock --- is a very high performance engine, folks.
AT LEAST SOMEONE GETS IT,AND UNDERSTANDS THAT MODIFYING ONE OF THESE EB MOTORS WILL NOT JUST BLOW IT UP.....I have never heard so many people that think they know it all,or think that all auto techs are UN-educated idiots.....I have a BA ,as well as a Associates in automotive technology, and made a great living turning a wrench ,while I am not the average technician,I am not in the minority either....techs today are not like the techs of the 1970's or shade trees with a degree in whatever it may be who think they know everything working in a office ,yet end up always having someone else fix the real failures...
Their is a huge difference between a parts changer,and a trained technician,and what does race have to do with the ability to repair a vehicle ?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 11:50 AM
  #173  
papa tiger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Likes: 240
Default

The piston itself by design is the limiting factor. This particular design has its faults if taken uphill too far. It and its attached rod are going to fail rather completely.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 12:03 AM
  #174  
1994Vmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 161
From: Ardmore Alberta
Default

Look up Canada....... and temporary foreign worker. I don't care what race you are if you are qualified..... but paying $150+ an hour for some unqualified guy they can pay a lower wage to than a resident of this country based on some joke labor shortage.... I don't support that. What happens in the US doesn't really mean much to me.....

Last edited by 1994Vmax; Nov 19, 2014 at 12:06 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 08:25 AM
  #175  
2ndchance's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 220
Likes: 22
From: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Default

Aboosted, I agree with you, modifications shouldn't automatically damage an engine. However, can see why Ford would look at whether an engine has been tuned and be suspicious. It seems smart to investigate before shelling out thousands of dollars. I'm not saying a tune should guarantee damage wouldn't be covered but I can see the argument. This same conversation takes place on the jeep forums.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.