Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Why the difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 09:16 AM
  #61  
Manuellabour247's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 396
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by johnday
Well, I've managed to keep my foot out of it with the tank that is in it. Mileage did pickup a bit on the "lieometre". Going downstate today, so will see what happens. 400 mile round trip, with city driving once I get down there, with it set on 87 P/T. I'll do my utmost to stay off it!! Well, maybe just a couple times LOL
Lol. Good luck with staying out of it. Let us know how much of a difference you feel in drivability
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 04:31 PM
  #62  
johnday in BFE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Village Sociopath
10 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 12,567
From: Nowhereville, Barton City Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Manuellabour247
Lol. Good luck with staying out of it. Let us know how much of a difference you feel in drivability
Drivability has definitely increased! I use a lot less throttle than stock. My mileage, on my way down here came up to 18.9 on the lieometre. That was on cruise at 60mph for 80 miles, and on cruise at 70 mph on the expressway for around 110 miles. I did kick it off cruise due to slower traffic, and did kick it up to 75 on the pedal for about 25 miles. All in all, I'm doing better it looks like. I plan on filling it up and do a manual calculation probably Sunday, when I head back north. That calculation will have around 50 miles crazy city driving on it.
Still not stellar mileage, but better.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 09:51 PM
  #63  
rraiderr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 224
Likes: 17
From: Great White North
Default

WTF, I only get 14.5 mpg on my 2014 5.0.


I do have a bit of a heavy foot.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 10:56 PM
  #64  
depami's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 168
From: Cleveland, MN
Default

Originally Posted by rraiderr
WTF, I only get 14.5 mpg on my 2014 5.0.


I do have a bit of a heavy foot.
You must have quite a heavy foot!

Here's mine and while not great, considering the sample size, it's not bad.

Why the difference?-19_0-mpg-1.jpg
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #65  
Oldsmuggler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 968
Likes: 232
Default

Originally Posted by johnday
Drivability has definitely increased! I use a lot less throttle than stock. My mileage, on my way down here came up to 18.9 on the lieometre. That was on cruise at 60mph for 80 miles, and on cruise at 70 mph on the expressway for around 110 miles. I did kick it off cruise due to slower traffic, and did kick it up to 75 on the pedal for about 25 miles. All in all, I'm doing better it looks like. I plan on filling it up and do a manual calculation probably Sunday, when I head back north. That calculation will have around 50 miles crazy city driving on it.
Still not stellar mileage, but better.
Did you adjust your transmission with the tune? If you did, how much of a difference did it make?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 05:49 AM
  #66  
johnday in BFE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Village Sociopath
10 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 12,567
From: Nowhereville, Barton City Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Oldsmuggler
Did you adjust your transmission with the tune? If you did, how much of a difference did it make?
Yes, the trans shift points and firmness was adjusted. It now shifts at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mph. The shifts are not so firm that it slams into gear though. I also noticed, the torque converter now locks in 4th, instead of 3rd. It reminds me of when the trans was in tow/haul mode before the tuner.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 09:35 AM
  #67  
RLXXI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 26,680
Likes: 6,253
From: Big Easy
Default

Mine seemed to get better economy on the 91p/t than the economy tune.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 01:19 PM
  #68  
SteveLord's Avatar
Senior Member
Veteran: Army
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 893
From: Iowa
Default

I get 17mpg with 87 p/t tune, level and 34'' tires.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 03:42 PM
  #69  
johnday in BFE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Village Sociopath
10 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 12,567
From: Nowhereville, Barton City Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Rnlcomp
Mine seemed to get better economy on the 91p/t than the economy tune.
Originally Posted by SteveLord
I get 17mpg with 87 p/t tune, level and 34'' tires.
Just got back from downstate. I wound up with 17.5 mpg, figured by calculator, by the lieometre was right there. First time that ever happened.

I'm going to try the 89PT next, probably be a couple weeks though, I'm only driving this downstate and back for right now.
That 17.5 is with 33" tires, and the type driving I mentioned in one of the above posts. If I get time this week, I'm going to make sure MPT used the tire size, gear ratio, and mods I sent them so they could program my tuner.
So far, I'm happy with it, but may contact MPT about the gear change speeds, I'd like to get the 2nd-3rd, on up, to shift a couple mph lower.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 10:35 PM
  #70  
RLXXI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 26,680
Likes: 6,253
From: Big Easy
Default

Originally Posted by johnday


I'd like to get the 2nd-3rd, on up, to shift a couple mph lower.




Press the tow/haul button, that'll bring the shift points down to what you want.


.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.