New TSB from Ford
As others have said, this is a very weird TSB to exist, it refers *only* to 4A systems, but it makes not sense as there isn't anything different to a regular SOF case so far as the IWE's are concerned.
I can see one scenario where an argument could be made for this seemingly stupid TSB. With a conventional T-case, assuming you select 4H on the go, the case engages first (getting the front assy turning) and then the IWE's engage immediately thereafter. In the case of selecting 4A on the go, but in a no slippage environment, the IWE's engage against a stopped half-shaft(s). The result is similar to what happens with a vacuum loss, they grind going in. I personally don't use my 4A position. It's either in 4X or out.
Last edited by PerryB; Dec 5, 2020 at 09:28 AM.
The reason I ask - It definitely did fix the issue, however, the one thing I observed is that steering felt noticeably heavier. I kept it disconnected for a few weeks until I saw this TSB the other day. I plugged that connector back in and pulled the hose and capped the ends per the TSB. It could totally be in my head but my steering seemed back to normal and lighter afterwards. I now really cannot tell any difference from when the IWEs were disengaged (have not compared mpg yet). I'm wondering if I pulled the wrong thing before or is this steering thing just in my head?
Either way, I'm happy for now and plan to roll with this going forward. I don't see any upside to replacing IWEs every 30 to 40k miles or sooner. Obviously agree with everyone that is ridiculous that Ford let this POS system live on for as long as they did and are punting on the fix.
I can see one scenario where an argument could be made for this seemingly stupid TSB. With a conventional T-case, assuming you select 4H on the go, the case engages first (getting the front assy turning) and then the IWE's engage immediately thereafter. In the case of selecting 4A on the go, but in a no slippage environment, the IWE's engage against a stopped half-shaft(s). The result is similar to what happens with a vacuum loss, they grind going in. I personally don't use my 4A position. It's either in 4X or out.
4-wheel-drive Auto with high range gearing (1.00:1) Full-time all-wheel-drive capability,
Electronically adjusted torque split to front & rear wheels, Electronically variable center differential,
Front driveshaft & rear primary driveshaft allowed rotational speed difference,
4-wheel electronic traction control system is enabled
In 4A mode the center differential is electronically-controlled and rear drive wheel bias. The on-board computer monitors for any sign of rear drive wheel slip (loss of traction)
I think I understand the system fairly well. When commanding 4H, the front shaft spins up before the IWE's go in. In 4A the IWE's are always in but the front shaft powers in and out based on commands from Traction Control. The engagement command comes when it detects rear wheel slippage. The catch comes when you select 4A as a preemptive measure, before rear wheel slip occurs. The IWE's are attempting to engage against a stopped half shaft and will grind in the process of getting the shafts spinning. In 4H the shafts are already spinning when the IWE's go in. As an experiment I'm kind of tempted to hook the IWE's directly to vacuum (just circumnavigate the control sol.) so they can't engage and then select 4A and see if the front shaft starts rotating immediately or not. I suspect not. Maybe I'm completely full of it but after going over the sequence of operations this is the only difference I can think of between the 2 different T-cases with regard to the timing of IWE engagement. I will say with certainty that the T-case has zero control over right/left power distribution to either axle. That's a function of the differentials, biased by traction control.
I think I understand the system fairly well. When commanding 4H, the front shaft spins up before the IWE's go in. In 4A the IWE's are always in but the front shaft powers in and out based on commands from Traction Control. The engagement command comes when it detects rear wheel slippage. The catch comes when you select 4A as a preemptive measure, before rear wheel slip occurs. The IWE's are attempting to engage against a stopped half shaft and will grind in the process of getting the shafts spinning. In 4H the shafts are already spinning when the IWE's go in. As an experiment I'm kind of tempted to hook the IWE's directly to vacuum (just circumnavigate the control sol.) so they can't engage and then select 4A and see if the front shaft starts rotating immediately or not. I suspect not. Maybe I'm completely full of it but after going over the sequence of operations this is the only difference I can think of between the 2 different T-cases with regard to the timing of IWE engagement. I will say with certainty that the T-case has zero control over right/left power distribution to either axle. That's a function of the differentials, biased by traction control.
I think I understand the system fairly well. When commanding 4H, the front shaft spins up before the IWE's go in. In 4A the IWE's are always in but the front shaft powers in and out based on commands from Traction Control. The engagement command comes when it detects rear wheel slippage. The catch comes when you select 4A as a preemptive measure, before rear wheel slip occurs. The IWE's are attempting to engage against a stopped half shaft and will grind in the process of getting the shafts spinning. In 4H the shafts are already spinning when the IWE's go in. As an experiment I'm kind of tempted to hook the IWE's directly to vacuum (just circumnavigate the control sol.) so they can't engage and then select 4A and see if the front shaft starts rotating immediately or not. I suspect not. Maybe I'm completely full of it but after going over the sequence of operations this is the only difference I can think of between the 2 different T-cases with regard to the timing of IWE engagement. I will say with certainty that the T-case has zero control over right/left power distribution to either axle. That's a function of the differentials, biased by traction control.
To clarify, the front half shaft and axles spin nearly all the time, even in 2H.
-- After watching the video linked below, yes maybe the TOD might experience some coasting of the front shaft due to fluid drag, however mine does not. At least not on the occasions I've checked it warm. Maybe it would if cold enough, I've never checked it cold. Even if it's coasting to a degree, the IWE's are still having to pull the shaft up to speed and that's where I think the grinding and wear is happening, and the underlying cause of this scab of a TSB.
Last edited by PerryB; Dec 6, 2020 at 11:52 AM.
If your statement was true, then when I was having the problem with my IWE grinding engaging 4A would not corrected the problem. But it did, if I left the truck in 4A I had no issues with the IWE grind, but with in a minute of disengaging 4A to 2H the grinding started (due to a bad check value). When I was talking to the tech that worked on my truck 2 days ago. It was explained to me that then you engage 4A the IWE are command to lock.
PS - With regard to your first sentence, I don't know you connected those dots. I've repeatedly said that selecting any 4wd mode will kill the IWE grind (assuming it's a vacuum problem) by engaging them. I have always espoused that and never said anything to the contrary.
Last edited by PerryB; Dec 6, 2020 at 11:57 AM.








