F150 Lightning
[QUOTE=pawprint;7016991]
Allow me to be clear, as you're no sure as to what I'm saying. The Tech that powers EVs At This Time, has Not Kept Up with Other Technologies. We can speculate on the reason(s) why, your speculation my be 100% correct, it does not in Any Way change the Fact : EV tech has not kept pace with other Tech over the last 100 years (or more).
Tech isn't a living thing, it doesn't "keep up", so I still don't get your point. It isn't like a toddler chasing after its bigger brother.
Humans are what determine the state of technology, and if there isn't investment, it doesn't happen. The hydrogen bomb didn't invent itself, the moon lander didn't suddenly burst into existence fully formed. It required significant hours and investment. ICE vehicles have had that investment, and EVs haven't. There isn't a "you may be correct" about it, it's pure fact. On ocassion someone has dabbled in EVs again, like the GM EV, which people loved and GM had to force them to return, but they haven't received nearly the attention.
So while you are correct in that EVs aren't at the same level of developmental maturity as ICE vehicles, that isn't a problem with EVs. You keep repeating something that is irrelevant. It's like saying the sky is blue without concern for why. A five year old can tell the sky is blue, it isn't a sign of some grand intelligence to identify that. I would say it's pretty incredible that with really only push from a single company, and a start up at that, that in roughly ten years they have reached parity with something that has received 100 years of non-stop development and countless billions in R&D is pretty incredible.
Allow me to be clear, as you're no sure as to what I'm saying. The Tech that powers EVs At This Time, has Not Kept Up with Other Technologies. We can speculate on the reason(s) why, your speculation my be 100% correct, it does not in Any Way change the Fact : EV tech has not kept pace with other Tech over the last 100 years (or more).
Humans are what determine the state of technology, and if there isn't investment, it doesn't happen. The hydrogen bomb didn't invent itself, the moon lander didn't suddenly burst into existence fully formed. It required significant hours and investment. ICE vehicles have had that investment, and EVs haven't. There isn't a "you may be correct" about it, it's pure fact. On ocassion someone has dabbled in EVs again, like the GM EV, which people loved and GM had to force them to return, but they haven't received nearly the attention.
So while you are correct in that EVs aren't at the same level of developmental maturity as ICE vehicles, that isn't a problem with EVs. You keep repeating something that is irrelevant. It's like saying the sky is blue without concern for why. A five year old can tell the sky is blue, it isn't a sign of some grand intelligence to identify that. I would say it's pretty incredible that with really only push from a single company, and a start up at that, that in roughly ten years they have reached parity with something that has received 100 years of non-stop development and countless billions in R&D is pretty incredible.
Last edited by vulnox; Aug 26, 2021 at 11:19 PM.
[QUOTE=vulnox;7017035]
Tech isn't a living thing, it doesn't "keep up", so I still don't get your point. It isn't like a toddler chasing after its bigger brother.
Humans are what determine the state of technology, and if there isn't investment, it doesn't happen. The hydrogen bomb didn't invent itself, the moon lander didn't suddenly burst into existence fully formed. It required significant hours and investment. ICE vehicles have had that investment, and EVs haven't. There isn't a "you may be correct" about it, it's pure fact. On ocassion someone has dabbled in EVs again, like the GM EV, which people loved and GM had to force them to return, but they haven't received nearly the attention.
So while you are correct in that EVs aren't at the same level of developmental maturity as ICE vehicles, that isn't a problem with EVs. You keep repeating something that is irrelevant. It's like saying the sky is blue without concern for why. A five year old can tell the sky is blue, it isn't a sign of some grand intelligence to identify that. I would say it's pretty incredible that with really only push from a single company, and a start up at that, that in roughly ten years they have reached parity with something that has received 100 years of non-stop development and countless billions in R&D is pretty incredible.
hahahaha, good one, really smart and witty!!! Of course nothing but humans keep up when it comes to tech!!!! I hope no one is out there thinking it keeps up on its own! HAHAHAHA, man that is a good gone.. I Guess I should Have Said, Humans (people) Did Not Research enough to keep EV at a PACE most other Techs are, today. But you sure have a keen eye, and a terrific wit, yes sir. To be clear, If I alluded to some strange self researching tech, I did not mean to, no sir!
Tech isn't a living thing, it doesn't "keep up", so I still don't get your point. It isn't like a toddler chasing after its bigger brother.
Humans are what determine the state of technology, and if there isn't investment, it doesn't happen. The hydrogen bomb didn't invent itself, the moon lander didn't suddenly burst into existence fully formed. It required significant hours and investment. ICE vehicles have had that investment, and EVs haven't. There isn't a "you may be correct" about it, it's pure fact. On ocassion someone has dabbled in EVs again, like the GM EV, which people loved and GM had to force them to return, but they haven't received nearly the attention.
So while you are correct in that EVs aren't at the same level of developmental maturity as ICE vehicles, that isn't a problem with EVs. You keep repeating something that is irrelevant. It's like saying the sky is blue without concern for why. A five year old can tell the sky is blue, it isn't a sign of some grand intelligence to identify that. I would say it's pretty incredible that with really only push from a single company, and a start up at that, that in roughly ten years they have reached parity with something that has received 100 years of non-stop development and countless billions in R&D is pretty incredible.
Someone keeps mentioning words to the effect that the US is or recently was energy independent and nobody's challenged that myth. We might have been before the 1970s but haven't been since. We got close briefly when our domestic production peaked at 14 million barrels a day (it's 11.4M today) but we use 18 to 20 million a day so no, we're not energy independent, please stop stating that as if it were fact. Fracked wells don't just keep producing oil and it's horribly inefficient to obtain (look up EROEI).
Let's be honest, if energy independence means producing more than is imported, in other words making more (pumping, generating etc.) more in the US than is consumed in the U.S. then Yes Sir, we were Energy Independent in the year 2019 we were!!!!! Does this mean we didn't import any fuel from other places during that time, no, it means we made more than we used, thus independent. Hope this helps.
Just think how incredibly far it will go in the next 10-20 years.
Our slow, weak, loud, "what's that noise", toxic exhaust, oil leaking dinosaur burners are going to seem about as modern and relevant as a 1920's steam locomotive
Went to Private event today at Joliet Raceway to preview and ride in the LIGHTNTING.
Ford Marketing group was there and was a nice event. With my lightning reserved, I still may end up with something different.( depending on the chip shortage delays )
But it is definitely built like a truck, extremely fast and handles like a sports car.
for me 60-300 mile round trips with work daily, I will have no problem adjusting.
Removable front crash bars (like the bronco) full front and rear independent suspension appears a mild 2" level or 3" light would not be too ridiculous either.
Fronk-storage is a huge plus and all the onboard power sources.
My other 2 choices if it's not A/Z plan eligible. will be a 3.5 Hybrid F150, or F150 Tremor ( I wish the Tremor had the Hybrid option )
Ford Marketing group was there and was a nice event. With my lightning reserved, I still may end up with something different.( depending on the chip shortage delays )
But it is definitely built like a truck, extremely fast and handles like a sports car.
for me 60-300 mile round trips with work daily, I will have no problem adjusting.
Removable front crash bars (like the bronco) full front and rear independent suspension appears a mild 2" level or 3" light would not be too ridiculous either.
Fronk-storage is a huge plus and all the onboard power sources.
My other 2 choices if it's not A/Z plan eligible. will be a 3.5 Hybrid F150, or F150 Tremor ( I wish the Tremor had the Hybrid option )
It was pretty private, reserved a lightning and was invited. They were also training some police about the new explorer police cars and some dealers. Not a crazy amount of people where there. I wish they would have let us drive the truck. But the drivers there were very aggressive and made you hold on ( which was cool ).
Finally got to see a new bronco briefly. a corp executive was there with one, but he was leaving right when I showed up. Was a 4dr Bronco-Badlands- Area 51. looked pretty cool. Just like the wrangler, the Bronco does have rattles and wind noise.
The lightning weighs more than my Steel 2014 F150, but does not ride like a heavy truck at all. The way the 4 independent suspension is setup, a Level kit will surely be available by the time these hit dealers summer 2022. Just weird not seeing a ICE. Looks like a large scale RC toy
Finally got to see a new bronco briefly. a corp executive was there with one, but he was leaving right when I showed up. Was a 4dr Bronco-Badlands- Area 51. looked pretty cool. Just like the wrangler, the Bronco does have rattles and wind noise.
The lightning weighs more than my Steel 2014 F150, but does not ride like a heavy truck at all. The way the 4 independent suspension is setup, a Level kit will surely be available by the time these hit dealers summer 2022. Just weird not seeing a ICE. Looks like a large scale RC toy








