Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Running Ethanol e-85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 05:55 PM
  #21  
Rabbit's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 349
Likes: 46
From: Southern Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by GhostriderI
Around here it $0.50 to $1.00 more depending on where you go
Only about $0.20 more a gallon for non ethanol where I get mine at. My last truck got almost 5 MPG more on it. My Goldwing motorcycle got 10 MPG more on it.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 06:08 PM
  #22  
2.7Ecoboost's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 527
Likes: 75
From: Austin, TX
Default

So that would defiantly defeat the extra MPG's you are getting. So when the EPA does mileage ratings to they use pure gas or do the use the 10% ethanol any one know?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 06:13 PM
  #23  
GhostriderI's Avatar
Senior
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 119
From: Pearl, MS
Default

Pure gas is what they use

http://www3.epa.gov/fueleconomy/documents/420f14015.pdf

See page 3

Last edited by GhostriderI; Sep 20, 2015 at 06:23 PM. Reason: Added link
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 06:19 PM
  #24  
DallasTXF150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 750
Likes: 209
Default Running Ethanol e-85

The highest MPG I had on 87 was 18.1mpg but that was after driving like I was driving Miss Daisy for the whole tank.

Regular driving was closer to 15-16mpg. For a while it was at like 14.8 or so.

Now running e85 I'm close to about 12.2-12.5mpg for about a 20-25% decrease in efficiency.

Regular gas is at like $1.89-$1.99

E85 is at $1.39-$1.49

Price difference is 26% so I net better mileage per dollar by going E85 lol
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 07:48 PM
  #25  
BoozeDaily's Avatar
F250>F150
Supporting Member

Veteran: Army
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 925
From: Midlothian, TX
Default

Originally Posted by DallasTXF150
The highest MPG I had on 87 was 18.1mpg but that was after driving like I was driving Miss Daisy for the whole tank.

Regular driving was closer to 15-16mpg. For a while it was at like 14.8 or so.

Now running e85 I'm close to about 12.2-12.5mpg for about a 20-25% decrease in efficiency.

Regular gas is at like $1.89-$1.99

E85 is at $1.39-$1.49

Price difference is 26% so I net better mileage per dollar by going E85 lol
Be careful on here using math that makes sense. Someone will inevitably show up with their slipstick (slide rule) and try to prove you wrong. I did the same comparison when I had a 5.0L. I was getting about 18.5 pretty steady after having 2500 or so miles on it. I started using E85 because it was $.60 less per gallon. I was getting about 16.7 on E85 for about 2000 miles.

I did the math, it made economical sense to run E85 as long as it stayed a certain amount below regular.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 11:29 PM
  #26  
DallasTXF150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 750
Likes: 209
Default Running Ethanol e-85

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
Be careful on here using math that makes sense. Someone will inevitably show up with their slipstick (slide rule) and try to prove you wrong. I did the same comparison when I had a 5.0L. I was getting about 18.5 pretty steady after having 2500 or so miles on it. I started using E85 because it was $.60 less per gallon. I was getting about 16.7 on E85 for about 2000 miles.

I did the math, it made economical sense to run E85 as long as it stayed a certain amount below regular.
Yep you're right about that. I figure if I don't get more than like 2.5-3mpg worse at a $0.50 cost savings then it makes economic sense.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2015 | 07:14 AM
  #27  
KEVININCHICAGO's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 755
Default

doesn't NASCAR run on ethanol now?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2015 | 09:20 AM
  #28  
Popsorama's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
From: Weatherford, TX
Default

I've run about 4 tanks of e-85 and so far no problems. It dropped about 2.7 mpg and is 45 cents less per gallon. What I don't understand is how you can say there is better performance, if running premium doesn't increase performance how can e-85 bump it up?
It is nice to fill up for $32.00.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2015 | 10:38 AM
  #29  
austingta's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 374
Likes: 36
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by Popsorama
I've run about 4 tanks of e-85 and so far no problems. It dropped about 2.7 mpg and is 45 cents less per gallon. What I don't understand is how you can say there is better performance, if running premium doesn't increase performance how can e-85 bump it up?
It is nice to fill up for $32.00.
e85 is 105 octane or so.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2015 | 10:46 AM
  #30  
jcat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 880
Likes: 227
From: RI
Default

All you guys doing the math, don't lose sight of the forest from the trees.

If you're talking a 25% decrease in fuel mileage with even a 30% decrease in cost, your net savings is 5%.

If you average $100 a week in fuel, you're saving about 1.5 cups of coffee per week.

I filled my 36 tank with 29 gallons of regular gas up here in the expensive New England region at $2.19 a gallon and it cost me ~$65. That'll probably last me 2 weeks anyway.

Closest E85 price reported on e85prices.com is in Pennsylvania at a cost of $1.99. That's a cost savings of about 10% for what would be an efficiency decrease of at least 25%, or a net negative 15%, and I'd have to fill up in a little over a week.

Last edited by jcat; Sep 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.