Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New ford buyer 3.5L V6 Ti-VCT question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2016, 08:48 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Canuck149's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I'd like to think I'm qualified to answer the OP's question, coming from a 15' w/3.5na then upgrading to a 16' w/5.0.

The 3.5na is a completely satisfactory engine for light duty use and good on gas, had zero issues with it....that being said I did upgrade my truck in size, options and engine before it was scheduled for it's first oil change!

Most people aren't stupid like I am and change their minds so quickly to trade up but if you're budget conscience then you'll be happy with the 3.5na
Old 07-06-2016, 08:57 AM
  #12  
J15
Certified Cow Porker
 
J15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,323
Received 360 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newfordbuyer168
First of all, Thanks to everyone for the helpful insight. This is my first big purchase and new from the dealership so i want to make sure i have all the facts and opinions before i go.

As for my location, I live in Orlando fl and i tow a 23 ft boat to go fishing a couple times a month. Along with the usual manual labor errands for working around the house but that's nothing any truck can't handle. I'm thinking about upgrading to a larger boat in a couple years but prob won't go anything above 5000 lbs
Have you considered the 5.0? It's a proven platform with minimal issues, gets acceptable gas mileage, has loads of power, and sounds fantastic. Assuming you simply don't want forced induction, the 5.0 should be your first pick. That NA V6 may leave you underwhelmed.
Old 07-06-2016, 10:13 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
dhmcfadin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 3,992
Received 1,210 Likes on 875 Posts

Default

Honestly curious but why do you want the non eco v6? It doesn't really make the power needed for these trucks. If you want something that is tried and true, go with the 5.0. It's not that much more and your truck won't be incredibly underpowered. Further, your resale value with be higher because you would have an engine people desire.
Old 07-06-2016, 08:00 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Curmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,360
Received 333 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2010stx4by4
Instead of typing that long paragraph , it's easier to ask the op where they're from....

Where are you from?
Old 07-06-2016, 08:19 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
SPOAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Georgia On My Mind
Posts: 7,383
Received 3,522 Likes on 1,689 Posts

Default

The 3.5 NA has to be a great motor as they put it in a large amount of fleet/work trucks.

But, don't drive the 2.7. The low-end grunt of the 2.7 will make the 3.5 NA feel kinda weak and poor.
Old 07-06-2016, 08:19 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
2010stx4by4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,054
Received 74 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

I'm from Bennington , Ne
The following users liked this post:
Curmudgeon (07-06-2016)
Old 07-06-2016, 09:14 PM
  #17  
T_R
Senior Member
 
T_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,090
Received 262 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dhmcfadin
Honestly curious but why do you want the non eco v6? It doesn't really make the power needed for these trucks. If you want something that is tried and true, go with the 5.0. It's not that much more and your truck won't be incredibly underpowered. Further, your resale value with be higher because you would have an engine people desire.
Depends on the truck. My stripped rcsb is fine with this engine. It's not underpowered. I drove a loaded CC 4x4 that somebody special ordered with the base 3.5 and honestly it was kinda slow. It probably weighed 1000 lbs more than mine.
Old 07-06-2016, 10:45 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Hardtaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 31
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Drive them before you decide. The 3.5na is solid. 95% of the people on here don't need a 5.0 or eb. And for asking who would want one...me! People that want a reliable motor without turbos and better mpg than a 5.0 can offer.
Old 07-06-2016, 11:49 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Fire708's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 337
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

I have the 3.5na in my '11 explorer. Haven't had a single problem and it pulls light trailers fine. I'm not gonna win any up hill speed trials whole towing but it's a great engine.
Old 07-07-2016, 12:00 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Humvee256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 126
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I would say that if you're worried about saving some money, the 3.5 NA is a good engine. It's a solid choice and reliable. For me, I felt it to be underpowered in the 4x4 SuperCrew configuration that I was looking for. I really enjoy my 2.7L EcoBoost. As others have said here, if you are worried about the turbos (which the problems have been virtually ironed out now), then go with the 5.0. It's a proven engine and is much stronger with better torque for towing your boat.


Quick Reply: New ford buyer 3.5L V6 Ti-VCT question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.