2.7 and 3.5 High Speed Interstate Passing?
#11
The FORScan Guy
Sport Mode FTW!
#12
GDreject
I thought the Eco's lost their oomph in the higher RPM's whereas the 5.0 keeps pulling? That's what I've read and seen on graphs here anyway.
The following users liked this post:
TRUCK150 (05-12-2016)
#13
This is a moronic thread. go out and test drive the damn thing.
__________________
2015 XLT Screw 2.7L FX4 Race Red: 302A, tow package, Chrome package, E-locker 3.73s, 36gl tank, bed extender, spray in, 20% tint
Moronic thread? Test drives come with having to fight off sales people with sticks afterwards if you're not ready to purchase right away. Figured asking a question like this on a forum designed for these kind of inquiry's would be pretty standard fare. Lol, sorry if I made you pull your beloved judgement card, TEX.
__________________
2015 XLT Screw 2.7L FX4 Race Red: 302A, tow package, Chrome package, E-locker 3.73s, 36gl tank, bed extender, spray in, 20% tint
Moronic thread? Test drives come with having to fight off sales people with sticks afterwards if you're not ready to purchase right away. Figured asking a question like this on a forum designed for these kind of inquiry's would be pretty standard fare. Lol, sorry if I made you pull your beloved judgement card, TEX.
Last edited by TRUCK150; 05-12-2016 at 03:18 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by TRUCK150:
2015PlatMag (05-12-2016),
berty (05-12-2016)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri Ozarks & Clay Country GA
Posts: 1,545
Received 162 Likes
on
134 Posts
last5oh, I don't know about Ecoboost losing any power. Whew, mine sure doesn't! That thing'll be going WAY too fast for me in a New York City second. And keep on going...
Don't worry about old TEX. He's okay, just probably needs a good cup of coffee. I'm buying, TEX. Hey, you gotta love TEXAS, a place that must be said and written in all CAPITALS.
Don't worry about old TEX. He's okay, just probably needs a good cup of coffee. I'm buying, TEX. Hey, you gotta love TEXAS, a place that must be said and written in all CAPITALS.
The following 2 users liked this post by iFord:
last5oh_302 (05-12-2016),
TRUCK150 (05-12-2016)
The following users liked this post:
iFord (05-12-2016)
#16
Old Fart
The goobers will finally understand that they are goobers when you pass them.
2.7 - start passing at 80 mph and you will have more power than you know what to do with.
2.7 - start passing at 80 mph and you will have more power than you know what to do with.
The following users liked this post:
TRUCK150 (05-12-2016)
#17
Senior Member
I am 65 years old and I still like to wind up the turbo from time to time. I traded in my 2012 FX 5.0 for the 2015 Lariat 2.7. I miss the sound of my 5.0 but but really like the power of my 2.7 and the gas mileage increase is great too.
The following users liked this post:
TRUCK150 (05-12-2016)
#18
Senior Member
A bump for this thread after buying the June 2016 Car&Driver.
F-150 Super Crew Lariat 4X4 5.0 3.55 Gears Test Weight 5,220 lbs
F-150 Super Crew Lariat 4X4 3.5 Eco Boost 3.55 Gears Test Weight 5,433 pounds.
5.0 Truck
0-30 2.3 Sec
0-60 6.3 Sec
0-100 16.5 Sec
1/4 mile 14.9@95 mph
Rolling Start 5-60 mph 6.6 Sec
Top Gear 30-50 mph 3.5 Sec
Top Gear 50-70 mph 4.5 Sec
0-60 mph with 6,400 lb trailer 13.4 Sec
1/4 Mile with 6,400 lb trailer 19.8@72 mph
Mileage CD observed 16 mpg
With 6,400 lb. Trailer 10 mpg
3.5 Eco Boost Truck
0-30 1.9 Sec
0-60 5.8 Sec
0-100 16.2 Sec
1/4 mile 14.6@95 mph
Rolling Start 5-60 mph 6.4 Sec
Top Gear 30-50 mph 3.4 Sec
Top Gear 50-70 mph 4.5 Sec
0-60 with 6,400 lb trailer 11.7 Sec
1/4 Mile with 6,400 lb trailer 18.6@73 mph
Mileage CD observed 16 mpg
With 6,400 lb Trailer 9 mpg
F-150 Super Crew Lariat 4X4 5.0 3.55 Gears Test Weight 5,220 lbs
F-150 Super Crew Lariat 4X4 3.5 Eco Boost 3.55 Gears Test Weight 5,433 pounds.
5.0 Truck
0-30 2.3 Sec
0-60 6.3 Sec
0-100 16.5 Sec
1/4 mile 14.9@95 mph
Rolling Start 5-60 mph 6.6 Sec
Top Gear 30-50 mph 3.5 Sec
Top Gear 50-70 mph 4.5 Sec
0-60 mph with 6,400 lb trailer 13.4 Sec
1/4 Mile with 6,400 lb trailer 19.8@72 mph
Mileage CD observed 16 mpg
With 6,400 lb. Trailer 10 mpg
3.5 Eco Boost Truck
0-30 1.9 Sec
0-60 5.8 Sec
0-100 16.2 Sec
1/4 mile 14.6@95 mph
Rolling Start 5-60 mph 6.4 Sec
Top Gear 30-50 mph 3.4 Sec
Top Gear 50-70 mph 4.5 Sec
0-60 with 6,400 lb trailer 11.7 Sec
1/4 Mile with 6,400 lb trailer 18.6@73 mph
Mileage CD observed 16 mpg
With 6,400 lb Trailer 9 mpg
70-90 probably goes to the 5.0 since more speed means more rpm and that is where the 5.0 likes to live. 50-70 is in the wheelhouse of the ecoboost...and it still isn't faster.
Actually, look at the 0-60 and 0-100 times. from 60-100 is 10.2s for the 5.0 and 10.4s for the 3.5 EB...at some point, the 5.0 does start closing...
#19
Senior Member
See Below...the 3.5 isn't walking past the 5.0 at highway speeds, not likely that the 2.7 does either...
50-70 in 6th, the 5.0 is just as quick as the 3.5EB.
70-90 probably goes to the 5.0 since more speed means more rpm and that is where the 5.0 likes to live. 50-70 is in the wheelhouse of the ecoboost...and it still isn't faster.
Actually, look at the 0-60 and 0-100 times. from 60-100 is 10.2s for the 5.0 and 10.4s for the 3.5 EB...at some point, the 5.0 does start closing...
50-70 in 6th, the 5.0 is just as quick as the 3.5EB.
70-90 probably goes to the 5.0 since more speed means more rpm and that is where the 5.0 likes to live. 50-70 is in the wheelhouse of the ecoboost...and it still isn't faster.
Actually, look at the 0-60 and 0-100 times. from 60-100 is 10.2s for the 5.0 and 10.4s for the 3.5 EB...at some point, the 5.0 does start closing...
Of course with a simple tune, any of those numbers you have are irrelevant. I have had the heaviest model of a tuned eco up to 125+ and it was pulling hard (in mexico) and can tell you that at hwy speeds where tires wouldn't be blown off due to lack of traction would absolutely leave most vehicles behind until well over 100 mph where aerodynamics are a huge factor.
Regardless, the 5.0 at higher rpms makes very good power and has more than enough power to be fun and fast.
The following users liked this post:
TRUCK150 (05-12-2016)