Topic Sponsor
4.2L Discuss the tried and true 4.2L.

4.2L reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #21  
ottawaguy's Avatar
Hunter of Moose
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Default

Originally Posted by Crummy4.2
1st motor, 0-101k when I bought it with no oil pressure.
2nd motor, 101k-120k blew upper intakes and hydrolocked
3rd motor, 120-214k presently still running, I went with the 4.2 again because it was a free-warrantied motor from motor #2 which was a jasper.
Obviously there was a problem with the motor when you bought the truck originally and somehow missed the whole no oil pressure thing. ????
2nd motor is a Jasper....your fault!
3rd motor.....well I guess free beats all.

Originally Posted by Crummy4.2
I didn't join the forum to bash, I joined it to read up on others experiences with this truck and to ask technical question. I was curious if everyone else's 4.2 was generally as "crummy" as mine. The guy asked about reliability, do you think it would be more accurate for only the people with positive experiences to comment. It's not bashing, it is simply an honest data point for the guy to consider before getting involved with this truck. I don't have a hidden brand agenda, as this is the only truck I've ever owned. Actually, only my second vehicle, first was a vomit baige 240 DL. That's why I am researching other experiences to see if my truck has standard performance and reliablity or not. If nobody wants to hear the negative, you should rename this thread "tell me good stuff about the 4.2"
Sounded like bashing to me


Originally Posted by Crummy4.2
Honestly guys, I am at a loss myself. It pisses me off to hear all you guys talk about what a beast this truck is and then drive my POS that I give extra special TLC and drive super easy. I guess mine is just a lemon. It's not abused or neglected though. I am definently OCD on my truck maintenance and repair. I do my oil at 3k, If any part on the truck even looks at me wrong, I will replace within a day or two. I baby the thing to the highest degree. This 3rd motor has been pretty reliable but still very weak. Owning this truck is definentely the number 1 greatest cause of stress and worry in my life. However, right now, being unemployed, it is more cost effective to fix stuff and baby it so that it doesn't blow the upper intakes.
Sounds to me like you just bought the wrong truck....I drive a Ford truck, because I need a dependable truck and my 94 was the most reliable vehicle I ever owned(had the inline 6 btw), unfortunately, some idiot decided to drive his Honda into it.
So far, my new truck has been great with only one issue of the infamous plastic bushings on the intake runner control linkages.


Originally Posted by Crummy4.2
I am very mechanically inclined: I grew up through my late teen years building high performance motocross motors (not bolt ons, real internal custom motor and chassis work), I've swapped my 4.2 and several other motors, I worked as a hired hand in college operating and maintaining large tractors, combines and equipment, I've got a mechanical engineering degree from Purdue with a minor in fluid power, I have designed-prototyped-implemented-patented-manufactured and sold an auxilary high flow hydraulic system for use on posi-track RC-60's, spent several years as a production engineer for our families stump grinder company
shall I refer back to buying a truck sight unseen because it sounded like a good deal, and then driving with no oil pressure.
....and when that blew, you thought a jasper was the way go??

I think you should quit while you're ahead....
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #22  
Crummy4.2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not say every 4.2 sucks, I'm just saying my experience with it has. You guys have sand all in your vaginas for no reason, I said I didn't like mine, you guys said you did...nuff said, everyone is entitled to their opinion.



Last edited by Crummy4.2; Mar 27, 2010 at 04:23 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #23  
Ken1992's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Default

If you didn't join to bash why did you use the name Crummy4.2? Then everything you said was negative until your second to last post. I'm not trying to be an@$$hole I was just reading what you wrote and it seemed to me like you were bashing. I hope you have better luck with your newest engine and your second engine must have been the 97/98 and you probably didn't know about the issues with those so it's no fault of your own the place where you bought should have known.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
Lenn's Avatar
Administrator
Supporting Member

Veteran: Coast Guard
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15,106
Likes: 1,754
From: Hampton, VA
Default

^ I do believe that you have had a *****ty experience with the truck. I would be miffed as well. To generalize and say that it will be underpowered and not blow up or be underpowered and blow up with no middle ground is just absurd. For a large truck with a decent sized V6, my butt dyno said that (with the 5speed) it had plenty of nuts. I do sympathize with your situation though. I really would have considered getting a new truck $5k ago.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #25  
Crummy4.2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

...........................

Last edited by Crummy4.2; Apr 17, 2010 at 09:36 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #26  
Lenn's Avatar
Administrator
Supporting Member

Veteran: Coast Guard
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15,106
Likes: 1,754
From: Hampton, VA
Default

Man... I can tell you that your experience with this truck is NOT the common consencus. Sorry to hear that this truck has tainted your opinion of the brand.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #27  
Crummy4.2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

............................

Last edited by Crummy4.2; Apr 17, 2010 at 09:36 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #28  
Crummy4.2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

........................

Last edited by Crummy4.2; Apr 17, 2010 at 09:37 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #29  
Ken1992's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Default

I think you have bad luck. The 4.2 is definitely not bullet proof, it hasn't been around long enough to say it is and Ford got rid of it for a reason.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:21 PM
  #30  
Crummy4.2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

................................

Last edited by Crummy4.2; Apr 17, 2010 at 09:37 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.