Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

Intake mods....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 02:01 PM
  #1  
SaltLife94's Avatar
Thread Starter
YOLO
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Little River, SC
Default Intake mods....

Is there any intake mods that can be done to A 95 5.8L?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 03:45 PM
  #2  
eherngsxr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Pretty much have endless options. U could buy a air intake such as k&n or air raid, or make your own for less money.... all depending on what ur looking for. Does your truck have a mass air flow sensor or is it speed density?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #3  
f150cam's Avatar
Dodge+Ford = always ready
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 112
From: Montana
Default

a simple K&N air filter will do, our air intakes are as good as it gets almost.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #4  
SaltLife94's Avatar
Thread Starter
YOLO
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Little River, SC
Default

Originally Posted by f150cam
a simple K&N air filter will do, our air intakes are as good as it gets almost.
Would it hurt anything if i just put a K&N on each of the inlets on the throttle body?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 09:03 PM
  #5  
Just call me Sean's Avatar
We'd do it
Supporting Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 35,602
Likes: 459
From: Orlando,Fl.
Default

Yes. You would draw in heated underhood air instead of cool outside air.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 09:22 PM
  #6  
unit505's Avatar
Salvage Yard Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 129
From: Keithville, La
Default

I could argue that oneS sean. Yes you'll take in heated air....less dense air, less fuel needed for combustion. Leaner fuel burn. Less hp, but slightly better mileage. However, on the 5.8, your probably not concerned with mileage. For more power you want a cold air intake and the stock box with a k&n is great. However, given the surface area of two k&n round filters or a single k&n rf1012, the increase in air flow on my 4.9 was a power boost. Just my 2 cents.

Last edited by unit505; Jul 10, 2012 at 09:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 09:27 PM
  #7  
f150cam's Avatar
Dodge+Ford = always ready
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 112
From: Montana
Default

Originally Posted by SaltLife94
Would it hurt anything if i just put a K&N on each of the inlets on the throttle body?
just get the flat filter that replaces the stock one, keep everything else. my dodge and 250 already came with the filters so i dont know of any improvements over stock. but my f150 i noticed a lil better MPG and seemed to breath a lil easier.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 04:14 AM
  #8  
Warlockk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 116
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by unit505
I could argue that oneS sean. Yes you'll take in heated air....less dense air, less fuel needed for combustion. Leaner fuel burn. Less hp, but slightly better mileage. However, on the 5.8, your probably not concerned with mileage. For more power you want a cold air intake and the stock box with a k&n is great. However, given the surface area of two k&n round filters or a single k&n rf1012, the increase in air flow on my 4.9 was a power boost. Just my 2 cents.
Hey I was thinking of you the other day. I was watching an engine show and they were discussing air intakes. So to bring up an old topic again. The designer was saying that the advantage of the cold dense charge was a more efficient burn. Meaning that the existing mixture burns more completely creating more power and less waste material. The ecu will still maintain the same air/fuel ratio therefore still using the same amount of fuel per cycle. So using our more power = less foot on the throttle = more mpg theory, you should do well with a cold air induction. Didn't want to restart an argument and anyone not up with this discussion that's interested can pull up long posts on both sides of the topic. I just thought I'd throw out some new insight. I'll see if I can find a link to the video.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 04:31 AM
  #9  
DriveAk's Avatar
James
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 0
From: Wasilla, Alaska
Default

here is what i did to the intake on my 88 351 ....i need a new filter though haha, what i did was disconnect the snorkel, flip the box, and cut off the bottom/top .......it is not a cold air intake...but it is higher flowing than stock
Attached Thumbnails Intake mods....-2012-06-19_21-53-36_948.jpg   Intake mods....-2012-06-19_21-53-53_968.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 05:15 AM
  #10  
unit505's Avatar
Salvage Yard Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 129
From: Keithville, La
Default

Originally Posted by Warlockk
Hey I was thinking of you the other day. I was watching an engine show and they were discussing air intakes. So to bring up an old topic again. The designer was saying that the advantage of the cold dense charge was a more efficient burn. Meaning that the existing mixture burns more completely creating more power and less waste material. The ecu will still maintain the same air/fuel ratio therefore still using the same amount of fuel per cycle. So using our more power = less foot on the throttle = more mpg theory, you should do well with a cold air induction. Didn't want to restart an argument and anyone not up with this discussion that's interested can pull up long posts on both sides of the topic. I just thought I'd throw out some new insight. I'll see if I can find a link to the video.
Yeah, this has been a long drawn out argument for years. I can say beyond any doubt that my mpg's improved by about 3mpg with a warm air intake. Of course this works with my vehicle. New vehicles might be opposite. Fact is though, warmer less dense air does burn leaner. Couple extra air flow and it at least equaled out power to mpg in my case.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.