took my 5.0 to the drag strip today
#51
Go with long tubes. I don't actually think anybody makes shorties for our trucks. On newer vehicles with the work that is required to change headers its always best to go long tubes since shorties don't give hardly any gain and doing it twice when you realize that is not a fun experience.
#52
Senior Member
Go with long tubes. I don't actually think anybody makes shorties for our trucks. On newer vehicles with the work that is required to change headers its always best to go long tubes since shorties don't give hardly any gain and doing it twice when you realize that is not a fun experience.
Many in the mustang world believe most of the gains when longtubes are installed come from high-flow/removed cats. This is my research and I am open to reading yours if your research shows otherwise. That said I would still get longtubes if the price was more realistic.
#53
The mustang take offs do not fit our trucks with out serious modification which negates even using them. Why is using them so funny you needed to add "lol"? You are deffinetly the first person I have ever heard say that long tubes only give gains because of stock cat removal/replacement. That really doesnt make any sense, you can add high flow cats or remove them all together with either setup. Moddedmustangs.com <- use the search button there to look up differences between long tubes and shorties. I have been in the mustang racing world since the fox body, shorties are the way to go if 1. you can't pass emissions with long tubes 2. You are running a turbo setup (though I've seen it done with long tubes, it's just harder to do) 3. You can't afford long tubes. When trying to make power a long tube setup will always make more. Hopefully, just like in the mustang world, some company like pypes or OBX (yes, most of their stuff is crap, but the 4.6 3V has proven worthy) comes out with a less expensive long tube.
#55
Senior Member
Originally Posted by mechanicboy
Pistons, rods, crankshafts, you name it is cam be built for a price. There's nothing for the eco that couldn't be built if someone had the money.
#56
Senior Member
The mustang take offs do not fit our trucks with out serious modification which negates even using them. Why is using them so funny you needed to add "lol"? You are deffinetly the first person I have ever heard say that long tubes only give gains because of stock cat removal/replacement. That really doesnt make any sense, you can add high flow cats or remove them all together with either setup. Moddedmustangs.com <- use the search button there to look up differences between long tubes and shorties. I have been in the mustang racing world since the fox body, shorties are the way to go if 1. you can't pass emissions with long tubes 2. You are running a turbo setup (though I've seen it done with long tubes, it's just harder to do) 3. You can't afford long tubes. When trying to make power a long tube setup will always make more. Hopefully, just like in the mustang world, some company like pypes or OBX (yes, most of their stuff is crap, but the 4.6 3V has proven worthy) comes out with a less expensive long tube.
Second, don't lie about what I said because I said most of the gain, now it only gains because of removal of the cats because that is not true.
Third, it only requires minor modifications which was done by Boss5.0. I know because I have been talking to him and I am waiting for him to give me a shipping quote on his takeoffs.
Forth, I lol'd because the oem makes them. yes they are not a direct bolton in the truck body but they will work with a little modification. Anyone afraid of doing the work to make those headers work should never touch FI or anything inside the engine like came swaps.
Last edited by mechanicboy; 09-26-2012 at 11:53 AM.
#57
Don't the Mustang headers require heating the frame rail with a torch and collapsing it with a C-clamp? It's not that I am incapable of doing that... it just sounds like a hack job on a new truck, especially to add a pair marginally better OEM headers.
#58
Senior Member
Ding ding ding, we have a winner! Thats the point i was making
#59
Senior Member
Keep in mind our trucks do NOT have headers right now, we have cast manifolds. Keep in mind that the mustangs have more intake came duration meaning they have more air coming in which in turn means it has more that needs to escape. They will benefit more from longtubes than our trucks will and they are only seeing small gains with longtubes with highflow cats compared to stock headers with highflow cats. I'm not making assumptions here, this is dyno verified on the mustang.
Boss5.0 decided to add the boss intake, mustang GT intake cams and a stall converter on top of NOS so he felt the move from shorties to longtubes was justified. Keep in mind he's(edit, he was) spinning 7500rpm down the strip with 4.10 gears so he needs to move way more exhaust gas out than we need to.
Last edited by mechanicboy; 09-26-2012 at 03:01 PM.
#60
Senior Member
Originally Posted by mechanicboy
That's a cakewalk, not major modifications. Heating and a small bend for saving $1000-1400 for what a couple more HP, I will take the heat!
Keep in mind our trucks do NOT have headers right now, we have cast manifolds. Keep in mind that the mustangs have more intake came duration meaning they have more air coming in which in turn means it has more that needs to escape. They will benefit more from longtubes than our trucks will and they are only seeing small gains with longtubes with highflow cats compared to stock headers with highflow cats. I'm not making assumptions here, this is dyno verified on the mustang.
Boss5.0 decided to add the boss intake, mustang GT intake cams and a stall converter on top of NOS so he felt the move from shorties to longtubes was justified. Keep in mind he's(edit, he was) spinning 7500rpm down the strip with 4.10 gears so he needs to move way more exhaust gas out than we need to.