Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0L or eco boost and why???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2016, 05:07 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
cbr600rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 425
Received 40 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I've had both. I had a 2011 EB, later tuned, and a 2015 5.0, later supercharged. I've enjoyed both trucks. When comparing the stock EB vs stock 5.0, both were similar in power but of course, the EB made it lower in the rev range. The tuned EB was even better on the low-end torque. I've found that the EB was 1-2 mpg better, as my 5.0 did 20-21 and the EB did 21-22 lifetime averages. Never really had problems with either one.
How was that 5.0 with a blower?
Old 12-02-2016, 05:15 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cbr600rx7
How was that 5.0 with a blower?
It's awesome! My favorite truck so far.
Old 12-02-2016, 07:29 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
TNfarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Keep the opnions coming guys! Does both motors use the same transmission also?? I'll be looking at trucks with no more then 40k on them and probally would plan on keeping it til atleast 100k+
Old 12-02-2016, 07:48 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
Martinomon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the 5.0 ...2011 and uses a qt. every 1500 miles.....love the truck , but thinking the eco would have been a better choice ....?
Old 12-02-2016, 08:01 PM
  #25  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
navycraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 52
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Both my brother and nephew have F-150s. Brother's is a 5.0 and nephews is an EB. Both said that for what I wanted, the EB would be a better choice so that's what I got and I'm really enjoying it. Had a blast today on some of the local back roads.
Old 12-03-2016, 01:34 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
tsigwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Garland, Tx
Posts: 1,495
Received 273 Likes on 189 Posts

Default

same transmission in all of them.
Old 12-03-2016, 10:52 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
N3UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 467
Received 86 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

I went with the 5.0 because I plan to keep the truck until it falls apart...

Besides the fact that I just like the V8 growl, my thinking was that the 5.0 would be less expensive to fix long down the road.
Turbos don't last forever, and aren't cheap.

The tow capability of the 5.0 is adequate for what I plan to tow. I don't have any issues with letting the motor wind. My previous truck had a 4.6, and you had to wind it up to get anything out of it. I gave it to my son inlaw with 205K and it's still going strong.

It more a matter of personal preference unless you are towing at the upper limits where the slight advantage goes to the EB.

In reality you probably can't go wrong with either.
Old 12-04-2016, 09:13 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
tsigwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Garland, Tx
Posts: 1,495
Received 273 Likes on 189 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by N3UP
I went with the 5.0 because I plan to keep the truck until it falls apart...

Besides the fact that I just like the V8 growl, my thinking was that the 5.0 would be less expensive to fix long down the road.
Turbos don't last forever, and aren't cheap.

The tow capability of the 5.0 is adequate for what I plan to tow. I don't have any issues with letting the motor wind. My previous truck had a 4.6, and you had to wind it up to get anything out of it. I gave it to my son inlaw with 205K and it's still going strong.

It more a matter of personal preference unless you are towing at the upper limits where the slight advantage goes to the EB.

In reality you probably can't go wrong with either.
The turbo for my eco (which is supposedly rated to run 150k miles) is $633 from Ford. Cheaper than a transmission rebuild.
Old 12-04-2016, 12:24 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
BACK2GAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 225
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

I opted for the V8 because I didn't want turbos. I've had 2 turbos go out at 2 different times on my past F250 diesel. They were a little premature in letting go and the cost...well who wants to spend money on turbos, right?

The problem was the down time. Both times I was towing a relatively small travel trailer on vacation. So vacation ruined.

Towing the beast off the road with my travel trailer to the dealer = $$$$$$$$$ and TIME, getting turbos to the dealer for the install = TIME, getting the dealer to bump it past other scheduled vehicles = TIME, etc.

I decided that unless I really, really, really, needed the power I was going conventional V8. So when it came time to make my purchase I didn't want anything to do with turbos. I'd feel like a jackass if I was on the side of the road, on vacation dealing with the same issue in a GAS truck with turbos!!! Lol! Plus I would've lost all credibility with the wife, after all it was her vacations as well. Needless to say she's anti-turbo herself.

That being said I haven't had any issues towing with the 5.0. She winds up on the long grades, but she seems fine.

Last edited by BACK2GAS; 12-04-2016 at 02:41 PM.
Old 12-04-2016, 12:38 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
bachman44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 371
Received 100 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

5.0 here. But it had to have 3.73s. Actually the motor choice wasnt really on my mind much. I wanted a crew, 6.5 box, xlt with center console, tow mirrors, and heavy duty rear end. Once I found a 5.0 with the 3.73s with everything else I wanted, the motor choice did not matter. I am happy with my choice and I imagine I would be happy with the eco as well.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 PM.