Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Heater Hose Insert?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
BareBonesXL's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,293
From: Washington
Default

That's good to know. Overall, I think it pays to know the details of the system you're working on. I'll bet some of the fancier models with zone control heating have different parts than base models.

Here's something I found, for 2003 - Some, maybe all, of the 2003 F150's do have a "heater control valve". Apparently it controls coolant flow through the heater core. Not clear why a restrictor would be needed if there is a control valve. Might be that mine doesn't have one.

Here's the 2003 valve. I'll have to track it down next time I have the hood up. Looks like it's vacuum controlled so there might be a relay and control valve associated.

https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/c...rd-f-150?pos=2
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 03:36 PM
  #12  
BareBonesXL's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,293
From: Washington
Default

Looks like 1999 has a valve and a restrictor. Not sure if they are combined. Just wandering down the rabbit hole...

Gates says reuse flow restrictor:
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...ater+hose,6892

https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...ter+valve,6860
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 04:10 PM
  #13  
BillSF9c's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 440
From: CA near Frisco
Default

Originally Posted by BareBonesXL
Looks like 1999 has a valve and a restrictor. Not sure if they are combined. Just wandering down the rabbit hole...
Gates says reuse flow restrictor:
Mine is an '01 5.4, XL w some T, options.
I have seen 250's w a valve. If I could make sensible upgrades, I probably would.

As one fellow mentioned though, w a full bypass, or stoppage, you don't get antifreeze's anticorrosion components flowing through..So maybe, a hole through the valve flapper, if that is doable, or like your AC, run it once a week for 5 minutes, come whatever weather.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 04:30 PM
  #14  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,207
Likes: 8,628
From: Utah
Default

Re-using the restrictor is not a fun task. I've put several back in on Mustangs over the years.... I'd buy one of the Motorcraft hoses with it already installed.


Reply
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 04:38 PM
  #15  
white89gt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 23,207
Likes: 8,628
From: Utah
Default

Not sure if this will help anyone on their F150, but this appears to be a much easier solution than my 86 and 89 Mustangs had. They use 5/8" hose as well.

https://lmr.com/item/LRS-18599A/79-0...low-Restrictor

EDIT: This was the original style.... huge pain to re-use. The one on my F150 definitely FEELS like this one, but I've never had to mess with it.

https://www.americanmuscle.com/ford-...stomer_reviews

Last edited by white89gt; Apr 27, 2022 at 04:42 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 04:48 PM
  #16  
BareBonesXL's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,293
From: Washington
Default

Amazon Amazon
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2022 | 05:15 PM
  #17  
BillSF9c's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 440
From: CA near Frisco
Default

Originally Posted by white89gt
Re-using the restrictor is not a fun task. I've put several back in on Mustangs over the years.... I'd buy one of the Motorcraft hoses with it already installed.

5/8" adaptor, on what remained of the Dorman 5/8" quick connect supply hose to the core. Putting the restrictor into a 3/4" hose is decidedly easier, but even fitting the 5/8" onto the metal engine fitting was really hard. Using 3/4 seemed ideal, and 5/8" brass 90's are harder to find. The 90 adds a bit of restriction. Downshot, the hose blew at its most stressed point & I used what I found available.

From the bottom right, clamp 1(input point), 2, brass 90, Clamp 3, 4 holds the restrictor, clamp 5 on the 3/4 end of the 3/4">5/8" adaptor, 6 on what remained of the Dorman 5/8" quick connect supply hose to the core. Putting the restrictor into a 3/4" hose is decidedly easier, but even fitting the 5/8" onto the metal engine fitting was really hard. Using 3/4 seemed ideal, and 5/8" brass 90's are hard to find. The 90 adds a bit of restriction at the most needed point.

Reply
Old Apr 28, 2022 | 12:54 AM
  #18  
GRF150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 678
Likes: 54
Default

Wait a minute....

what year is this truck/vehicle we are speaking about ?

KH 709 is a "supply" heater hose for the 5.4 L 10th Gen F150 not the 4.6 L.

there should be clamps on both ends of the hose....

So to summarize: the 5.4 L 10th gen F150 has 3 heater hoses: KH 735 (return), KH709 (supply hose), KH 733 (inlet)
4.6 L only has: KH 733 (supply hose) & KH 735 (return) .
So where is the "supply hose" for the 4.6 L 10th gen F150 ?

where is the clip for the end of this hose since the heater hose connector is on the other end of the hose ?

Last edited by GRF150; Apr 28, 2022 at 12:58 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2022 | 01:01 AM
  #19  
GRF150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 678
Likes: 54
Default

That engine has aged well thanks to Cali's climate. Nice work Bill!

Reply
Old Apr 28, 2022 | 01:13 AM
  #20  
GRF150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 678
Likes: 54
Default

So by the looks of it, on my 4.6 L...
I need the KH 735 & KH 733


Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.