Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Finally found the issue!!! I hope

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2018, 09:59 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
mapleleaf1773's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 387
Received 80 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Sorry guys, I was typing and thinking incorrectly before my coffee. I know you guys have helped. I'm just not with it this morning. Disregard my comment earlier. It just came out wrong.

if any of you are married I'm sure you understand how that happens.

Old 10-29-2018, 10:02 AM
  #22  
Driving the wheels offer
 
01-7700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 978
Received 156 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

with all that pro help available, i wonder why he even bothers with us
Old 10-29-2018, 10:28 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
10thGenFnatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fordguy2100
If your father rebuilds engines why hasn't he been helping you diagnose this truck from the get go?
he doesnt do it for a living, but he knows how, he works every single day , so hes gonna have to take vacation days to rebuild it
Old 10-29-2018, 11:23 AM
  #24  
Driving the wheels offer
 
01-7700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 978
Received 156 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

ah, makes sense
Old 10-29-2018, 06:31 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
10thGenFnatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I tested the compression again just now, ans all the cylinders are showing around 118 to 130 psi, with or without oil in them? Confused as why they were so different yesterday
Old 10-29-2018, 07:28 PM
  #26  
Driving the wheels offer
 
01-7700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 978
Received 156 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

pressure can sometimes encabulate on the first go round of testing - i'd say the second round numbers are closer to actual
Old 10-29-2018, 07:39 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
10thGenFnatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01-7700
pressure can sometimes encabulate on the first go round of testing - i'd say the second round numbers are closer to actual
Thank you, well with that said, the oil leak is fixed, pressure seems good, the only thing left i can think of is bad fuel injectors possibly, you guys tell me maybe im wrong, but since plugs 1 and 2 were pretty damaged compared to all the other ones, do you think those injectors could be bad and that i should replace injectors and plugs, also, can a bad injector damage a plug?
Old 10-29-2018, 07:39 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,224
Received 5,554 Likes on 4,631 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 10thGenFnatic
I tested the compression again just now, ans all the cylinders are showing around 118 to 130 psi, with or without oil in them? Confused as why they were so different yesterday
If that's accurate, and the engine has enough compression to run without misfire, it's still usable. You can manipulate blow-by to get by, but you have to separate it from the intake IF it's too heavy. 130 x 75% is about 97psi min, but that minimum is far too low for good enough combustion. Actually, I'm not sure exactly how little compression you can get away with here. But I do know the cylinder will not fire when there's not enough. You don't have that problem...yet. Puts it in the green for now. But, you need to re-verify compression numbers...as many times as it takes to confirm actual. Otherwise it's about worthless. Currently your numbers vary far too much from your previous attempt. So you need to get the test procedure down to the point you come up with the same results...test after test.

Last edited by Jbrew; 10-29-2018 at 07:49 PM.
Old 10-29-2018, 07:52 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
10thGenFnatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jbrew
If that's accurate, and the engine has enough compression to run without misfire, it's still usable. You can manipulate blow-by to get by, but you have to separate it from the intake IF it's too heavy. 130 x 75% is about 97psi min, but that minimum is far too low for good enough combustion. Actually, I'm not sure exactly how little compression you can get away with here. But I do know the cylinder will not fire when there's not enough. You don't have that problem...yet. Puts it in the green for now. But, you need to re-verify compression numbers...as many times as it takes to confirm actual. Otherwise it's about worthless. Currently your numbers vary far too much from your previous attempt. So you need to get the test procedure down to the point you come up with the same results...test after test.
sounds like a plan, ill test for the next few days im home. Read my previous comment and tell me what you think, would like your thought on it
Old 10-29-2018, 08:02 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,224
Received 5,554 Likes on 4,631 Posts

Default

The compression test is cylinder variance within 15%. So when you get solid numbers, multiply the highest number (max #) x 75%. That will give you your bare minimum (min #) for the rest, or comparison.

130 max comes out to 97.5 min


Quick Reply: Finally found the issue!!! I hope



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 PM.