Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 12:38 AM
  #6721  
charliedyal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 144
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
Almost that time.
I still don't see a torsion bar running through that lower control arm...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 12:39 AM
  #6722  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by charliedyal
I still don't see a torsion bar running through that lower control arm...
don't be that guy lol
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 12:51 AM
  #6723  
charliedyal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 144
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by jferg92
don't be that guy lol
LOL. Right now I'm the guy who can't sleep. I'm hoping he's got the whole T-bar dilemma sorted out. But i haven't gotten a straight answer from him. Gonna have a helluva rake going on if he drives it like that!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 12:59 AM
  #6724  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by charliedyal
LOL. Right now I'm the guy who can't sleep. I'm hoping he's got the whole T-bar dilemma sorted out. But i haven't gotten a straight answer from him. Gonna have a helluva rake going on if he drives it like that!
get some sleep! I'm a college student I'm allowed to be up now but need to rest up. Going for three weekends I've f'd up in a row

When all else fails shop for truck parts...hey look a radiator I don't need..but shiny
Attached Thumbnails Engine Builders talk.-image-830203751.jpg  

Last edited by jferg92; Jan 20, 2015 at 01:04 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 01:14 AM
  #6725  
charliedyal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 144
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by jferg92
get some sleep! I'm a college student I'm allowed to be up now but need to rest up. Going for three weekends I've f'd up in a row

When all else fails shop for truck parts...hey look a radiator I don't need..but shiny
LOL. Looks like both of us are browsing ebay. Just ordered a blend door actuator for the grand prix. Also pricing head gaskets for the truck. Those, SC gaskets, water pump, belt and a couple more odds & ends & I'll have her ready.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 07:26 AM
  #6726  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,533
Likes: 7,638
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
The higher the strand count the better the conductivity is. Regardless if its tinned or not. I use silver/tin solder. I'm using 2/0 that has 6230 strands. It copper core with a tinned skin. Its rated for over 480 amps current draw. Conductivity is more crucial when talking Voltage. Not so much amperage.

Look at it like a water hose. Amperage=pressure Voltage=flow.
Originally Posted by ibd2328
I would have to disagree with that on some accounts.
Originally Posted by charliedyal
Here we go......
Okay, I would pay for tickets to see this debate...ehh Charlie lol
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 07:36 AM
  #6727  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

I don't much care for the very high strand counts. It is flexible but wears much easier. The resistance of a 1ga wire over 10-12ft is pointless to argue over if you are using copper. They are essentially the same when talking about this application. Anyways; heres some math/physics for the nerds For No. 12 AWG Table 8 of the NEC does list two different DC resistances for stranded and solid copper. DC resistance per 1000 feet for solid is 1.93 ohms For stranded the DC resistance is given as 1.98 ohms per 1000 feet. So solid should have a slightly higher ampacity. If we use Table 310.16 of the NEC to determine RCA and substitute into the Ampere calculation we can find the approximate differences in ampacity. From Table 310.16 using 75 degrees C as the ambient. I = 25 amperes, TC = 75 degrees C, and TA = 30 degrees C and RDC = 1.98 ohms per 1000 feet or 0.00198 ohms per foot. This converts to 1980 microhms. From I (in kiloamperes) = SQRT(( TC-TA)/RDC*RCA)) Or RCA=(TC-TA)/RDC*I*I Or RCA = (75-30)/1980*0.025*0.025 RCA = 36 thermal ohm feet For stranded, I = 0.025 kiloamperes from the table For solid No. 12 copper I (in kiloamperes) = SQRT ((75-30)/1930*36) or I = 0.0254 kiloamperes Then the solid No. 12 copper would have a 0 .4 ampere increase in ampacity. This is a 0.4/25 *100 or only a 1.6 per cent increase. Considering that ampacity tables are approximations, this increase in ampacity does not exceed the error of approximation.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 07:39 AM
  #6728  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by Jbrew
Okay, I would pay for tickets to see this debate...ehh Charlie lol
Well here we go brew. Gotta throw in some physics from an old college bud who was big into Cal based electronics. I just set up the pde's
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 07:51 AM
  #6729  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
I would have to disagree with that on some accounts.
Not when your talking low voltage. I work this for a living. Electrical is my thing.

The difference is very minute.

Last edited by Carcrazygts2; Jan 20, 2015 at 07:59 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2015 | 07:59 AM
  #6730  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Not when your talking low voltage. I work this for a living. Electrical is my thing.
That's my thing too. Anything with laws or physics.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.