Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Towing question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 02:08 PM
  #51  
Twisty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 48
From: Hillsboro, OR
Default

"Is there really a need for an F350 TD when it would tow 15 or less times a year and never over 8500 lbs?"
In my Dad's opinion, yes. He is driving his third Chev/GMC 4x4 dually. Love 'em! Tanks on tires!
First one was gas, 2nd and 3rd diesel. This one is the TD Duramax and it pulls like an insane ox.
The first TT was just 21 feet, he bought a dually to get ready for a fiver. They own their 2nd fiver. Neither fiver weighs(ed) more than 10k.

It is very common around here to see dually's pulling horse trailers of all kinds. Hay, feed, tack, etc. and 2 or 3 or 4 moving animals?!?!? What a ride!

And for #3 - Thank you. I appreciate your honesty too. Many threads on this forum just turn into a pissing match, it's nice to have a conversation.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #52  
jcb206's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 242
Default

Originally Posted by Twisty
"Is there really a need for an F350 TD when it would tow 15 or less times a year and never over 8500 lbs?"
In my Dad's opinion, yes. He is driving his third Chev/GMC 4x4 dually. Love 'em! Tanks on tires!
First one was gas, 2nd and 3rd diesel. This one is the TD Duramax and it pulls like an insane ox.
The first TT was just 21 feet, he bought a dually to get ready for a fiver. They own their 2nd fiver. Neither fiver weighs(ed) more than 10k.

It is very common around here to see dually's pulling horse trailers of all kinds. Hay, feed, tack, etc. and 2 or 3 or 4 moving animals?!?!? What a ride!

And for #3 - Thank you. I appreciate your honesty too. Many threads on this forum just turn into a pissing match, it's nice to have a conversation.
Yeah, I would probably feel safer in the SD and safety for the family is always important. I think a dually is a little much. Wife thinks its odd for it to be a daily driver, such a huge truck, but hate to spend $30K+ for a truck that only gets driven a couple times a month. I guess a $5K car to drive back and forth to work would pay for itself, just hate small cars. The good thing is a $30K used SD is a lot cheaper than a new 2012 F150 with most of the trimmings and accomplish more but is it more economical? Hopefully its a push. Was spending over $300 a month on gas for my F150. Gas has gotten to the point that its a major expense, almost like another car payment. $500-700 a month on a truck and $300-400 on gas is expensive. Decisions, decisions...maybe just stay with one car for two years and pay cash for a used SD. Who knows.

Definitely great to have a good conversation with no name calling.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 03:14 PM
  #53  
DDL_CGY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jcb206
Do you know what the RGAWR is for the HD Payload Package?
HD payload package Rear GAWR is 4800 lbs.

This lets you get nearer to max payload or max towing rating with more than just a driver onboard without overloading the rear axle.

Last edited by DDL_CGY; Dec 4, 2011 at 03:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 03:53 PM
  #54  
jcb206's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 242
Default

Originally Posted by DDL_CGY
HD payload package Rear GAWR is 4800 lbs.

This lets you get nearer to max payload or max towing rating with more than just a driver onboard without overloading the rear axle.

Thats awesome. The rear weighs near 2800 lbs when empty. 2000lbs give you a lot of wiggle room with a 1400 lb tongue weight or gooseneck pin weight. Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 10:50 AM
  #55  
fordjamie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 457
Likes: 5
From: canada
Default

Originally Posted by jcb206

I agree, but the question is would 15% be better than 10% or does is depend on the trailer? Thus more payload available would be optimal.
I think it would all depend on the trailer. tts are balance pretty well so if the recommend 10 % I would think that is optimal tongue weight. I would think any more the trailer would be front heavy and cause the trailer to sway because of lack of weight over the trailer axels. IMO
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 12:38 PM
  #56  
flixden's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by fordjamie
I think it would all depend on the trailer. tts are balance pretty well so if the recommend 10 % I would think that is optimal tongue weight. I would think any more the trailer would be front heavy and cause the trailer to sway because of lack of weight over the trailer axels. IMO
No, more tongue weight will not cause sway, it will actually reduce the probability of sway happening.
For a given trailer, it will be less likely to sway with 15% tongue weight compared to 10% tongue weight. The upper limit of the tongue weight percentage is there to avoid overloading the tongue itself, the TV's hitch and the TV's GVWR / payload.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 12:49 PM
  #57  
fordjamie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 457
Likes: 5
From: canada
Default

Originally Posted by flixden

No, more tongue weight will not cause sway, it will actually reduce the probability of sway happening.
For a given trailer, it will be less likely to sway with 15% tongue weight compared to 10% tongue weight. The upper limit of the tongue weight percentage is there to avoid overloading the tongue itself, the TV's hitch and the TV's GVWR / payload.
To a certain point. If the tongue weight is to much it can cause dive during heavy breaking. Witch could result in loss of steering and sway.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 12:58 PM
  #58  
flixden's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by fordjamie
To a certain point. If the tongue weight is to much it can cause dive during heavy breaking. Witch could result in loss of steering and sway.
Yes, but that would imply that you went over the limits of the tow vehicle.
What it means is that a 20% tongue weight is not necessarily a very bad thing if all components can support it, including the trucks receiver, payload, axle ratings and the trailer frame / tongue itself.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 03:42 PM
  #59  
fordjamie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 457
Likes: 5
From: canada
Default

Originally Posted by flixden

Yes, but that would imply that you went over the limits of the tow vehicle.
What it means is that a 20% tongue weight is not necessarily a very bad thing if all components can support it, including the trucks receiver, payload, axle ratings and the trailer frame / tongue itself.
Not always true. If you are pulling just under or at your limit this could happen. If the trailer was designed for a certain tongue weight. I had this happen to me on one of my old enclosed trailers and it was well within the limits of the truck

Last edited by fordjamie; Dec 5, 2011 at 03:47 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 PM.