Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RAS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 02:14 PM
  #1  
Floridamark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Default Road Master Active

I installed the RAS Saturday morning. I removed the lift blocks under the springs and set up the RAS with the Black disk. Stock height measured 39 ¼, with the blocks removed and the RAS set up the measurement was 39 ¾ +/-. As all of you know from the other RAS reviews the improvement is undeniable. Smoother Ride no jolting over bumps, better turning, less squat, less sway, the truck as a whole feels more controlled. I only towed my 16’ Trailer with my Polaris Ranger in it and could not have asked for better with a light load. I won’t be pulling my RV until Deer Season is over however I will update as time goes on, but I would like to thank everyone for reviewing and testing the RAS so it would be an easy choice for me.
And a big thanks to Nolan for all the time he spent with me.

Last edited by Floridamark; Oct 22, 2012 at 02:52 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 05:33 PM
  #2  
Roadmaster's Avatar
F150 Forum
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 145
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Floridamark
I installed the RAS Saturday morning. I removed the lift blocks under the springs and set up the RAS with the Black disk. Stock height measured 39 ¼, with the blocks removed and the RAS set up the measurement was 39 ¾ +/-. As all of you know from the other RAS reviews the improvement is undeniable. Smoother Ride no jolting over bumps, better turning, less squat, less sway, the truck as a whole feels more controlled. I only towed my 16’ Trailer with my Polaris Ranger in it and could not have asked for better with a light load. I won’t be pulling my RV until Deer Season is over however I will update as time goes on, but I would like to thank everyone for reviewing and testing the RAS so it would be an easy choice for me.
And a big thanks to Nolan for all the time he spent with me.
I'm glad I was able to help you out, let us know how that works out when you hook up your rv!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 08:18 PM
  #3  
Floridamark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Default

I can confirm that I am getting better fuel mileage. about 12%.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
hetman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 306
Likes: 44
From: Texas
Default

approx how much ?????
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
baldy500's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 6
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Floridamark
I can confirm that I am getting better fuel mileage. about 12%.
Huh?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 06:56 AM
  #6  
Floridamark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Default

This was the first test being I have a 36 gallon tank. Give me a few more weeks of testing and I will track and post.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 07:56 AM
  #7  
justjimmy's Avatar
Better OUT then IN
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 255
From: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Default

Originally Posted by Floridamark
I can confirm that I am getting better fuel mileage. about 12%.
I was the first person to test RAS and helped start the Group Buy for all of us F150ers. https://www.f150forum.com/f82/axel-w...ension-141106/ I have to say, I couldn't be happier with the performance of this product - however; I have never seen a difference in MPGs.

Shortly after I installed RAS, I leveled the front with Bilstein 5100's, and installed Nittos all around thus negatively effecting my MPGs (of course, no fault of RAS). If there is something I can do (with the RAS) to improve my MPGs and offset the effect the larger tires have made, please let me know.

Again, I LOVE the Roadmaster Active Suspension and have ZERO complaints. I never expected better MPGs from this product so any improvement would be welcome.

YOU ROCK NOLAN!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 08:09 AM
  #8  
Floridamark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Default

JustJimmy,
I know you are the first and I followed your post and Nolan even brought you up. I don’t know if it is due to the weight of my tires or what. But like I said I removed the 1 1/4 inch spring blocks and set RAS a loose Black disk setting. It seems like from stop light to stop light it may have better forward motion, move forward easier. The heavy tires may have been causing some spring deflection that I now don’t have? I will keep testing.

Last edited by Floridamark; Oct 25, 2012 at 09:34 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
Roadmaster's Avatar
F150 Forum
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 145
Likes: 13
Default

Good discussion guys..... we typically see a minimum of 5% fuel savings when under a load. We don't actively market this benefit, but we do have a page on our website that talks about fuel savings benefits. There are simply to many other benefits gained from the product, that are more tangible and easier to track.

Part of the reason we don't actively market this, is it can be tough for an individual to accurately track fuel consumption/savings apples to apples. Companies with fleets that track every penny have the resources to do so, and because of that we have a binder full of testimonials from companies that run their fleet vehicles under constant load. I have seen testimonials that range between 4 and 16%, the number can vary based on type of vehicle, how heavy the load etc etc. Rather than write a whole paragraph on the how and why, here's a link that will save me some time!

http://www.activesuspension.com/how-to-save-fuel/
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 10:42 AM
  #10  
justjimmy's Avatar
Better OUT then IN
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 255
From: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Default

Originally Posted by Floridamark
JustJimmy,
I know you are the first and I followed your post and Nolan even brought you up. I don’t know if it is due to the weight of my tires or what. But like I said I removed the 1 1/4 inch spring blocks and set RAS a loose Black disk setting. It seems like from stop light to stop light it may have better forward motion, move forward easier. The heavy tires may have been causing some spring deflection that I now don’t have? I will keep testing.
Awesome... I look forward to your results.. like I said earlier, I never expected any MPG gains and I most certainly caused MPG loss because of the tires.

Originally Posted by Roadmaster
Good discussion guys..... we typically see a minimum of 5% fuel savings when under a load. We don't actively market this benefit, but we do have a page on our website that talks about fuel savings benefits. There are simply to many other benefits gained from the product, that are more tangible and easier to track.

Part of the reason we don't actively market this, is it can be tough for an individual to accurately track fuel consumption/savings apples to apples.

Agreed - it's an impossible task to calculate with all the extenuating circumstances involved. MY BIGGEST MPG fluctuation is wind. It always seems I'm driving into a head wind (I notice this by watching the grass/trees bending on roadside).

Companies with fleets that track every penny have the resources to do so, and because of that we have a binder full of testimonials from companies that run their fleet vehicles under constant load. I have seen testimonials that range between 4 and 16%, the number can vary based on type of vehicle, how heavy the load etc etc. Rather than write a whole paragraph on the how and why, here's a link that will save me some time!

http://www.activesuspension.com/how-to-save-fuel/
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.