Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Looking to buy pre-owned 100k+ SCrew: 5.0 or EB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2016, 09:12 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
2011Eco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 268
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Here's proof that they are out and exist (high mileage and surviving EcoBoost's). Obviously, we don't know the history of the vehicles. Would be great if the owners were members here...

http://www.schoeppmotors.com/invento...W1ET1CKE38858/
183,558

http://www.schoeppmotors.com/invento...W1ET3BFC56733/
195,555
________________
Old 02-03-2016, 09:46 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
anotherfordguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 244
Received 48 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Highest mileage F150 for sale on autotrade in the entire US.
http://www.greenvillechrysler.com/ve...FW1EF4BFA59421

254k miles, 5.0
Over 29 of this gen f150's listed over 200k miles, more 5.0's than ecoboosts but there are several ecoboosts as well.

Wouldn't surprise me at this point if some have hit 300k, although I've never seen it. There's probably 10 examples on the road for every one that we see with this kind of mileage.
Old 02-03-2016, 10:29 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
missionman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 184
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

how has no one asked you what you plan to use the trucks for? if youre towing or hauling heavy, get the EB. IF not get the 5.0.


is there a price difference? if the 5.0 is cheaper and you don't tow/haul, youre in business. simple as that. both trucks are a gamble at 100k+ miles. engine, trans, drivetrain, etc...save money up front if you can and get one with a service history. cross fingers and hope for the best
Old 02-03-2016, 10:51 PM
  #14  
FDT
 
fseries54303's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: The Land of Cheese
Posts: 859
Received 219 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anotherfordguy
Highest mileage F150 for sale on autotrade in the entire US.
http://www.greenvillechrysler.com/ve...FW1EF4BFA59421

254k miles, 5.0
Over 29 of this gen f150's listed over 200k miles, more 5.0's than ecoboosts but there are several ecoboosts as well.

Wouldn't surprise me at this point if some have hit 300k, although I've never seen it. There's probably 10 examples on the road for every one that we see with this kind of mileage.

Damn I guess I got a steal on mine then! I bought an 11 XLT Scab 3.7l one year ago today with 187,xxx miles for $9,000. Up to 202,xxx miles now.
Old 02-03-2016, 10:53 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
missionman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 184
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WXman
I faced this a few weeks ago. Was looking at trucks in the 100K range. Fortunately, my buddy is the sales manager so he let me take two identical trucks, one with EcoBoost and one with Coyote, for extensive testing. The Coyote produced slightly better fuel economy, had noticeably smoother throttle response, and has a heavenly sound under throttle. It's also stone age simple under the hood, whereas the EcoBoost truck looked like a jigsaw puzzle gone wrong. The intercooler is hanging low just waiting to get damaged, the turbos are buried so deep under the hood you can't even see them, and it was just painfully obvious that between 100K and 200K the EcoBoost would cost a lot more money to keep on the road and service.

So I went with the Coyote and don't regret my decision at all.

Would love to hear about your "extensive" 5 mile test drives considering most of your arguments are subjective at best. The only accurate thing you stated was the fuel economy.


-who cares about engine sound, v8 vs turbos spooling is subjective
-stone age simple? a 32v 4cam v8 with variable valve timing? oky doky. well at least the 5.0 has powder metal connecting rods (wtf is that anyways?) and a 4 bolt main. the 3.5 has forged rods AND crank, sleeved block as well, oh and a 6 bolt main.
-intercooler damage is laughable and hardly catastrophic if a boost leak is caused. what about radiator punctures?
-assumptive not even subjective opinon, painfully obvious maintenance costs on your extensive drives? so you have experience with both trucks between 100-200k miles ?


sold my 5.0 for the EB, 5.0 was great when not towing or hauling. I had zero issues with it and really enjoyed it. the non-tow/haul MPGs were better as well. 5.0 was brutal to tow heavy with, gear hunting and high RPMs with no low end grunt. not good for the Adirondack and white mountain regions with 8k lbs hooked up out back. Neither truck gave me issues though. I had the 5.0 for 15k miles (4k towing) and the EB for 24k miles (5500towing).


Bottom line with the maintenance is that it is a gamble between both trucks at 100k+, anyone saying otherwise is biased by what they own.
Old 02-03-2016, 11:22 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 9,910
Received 2,103 Likes on 1,726 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Augster
The problem is that I'm currently a full time student several states removed from all my uber expensive tools necessary to perform any automotive repair beyond basic maintenance.
This is what I don't get. Why do you need a Platinum as a student looking to get by with a high mileage vehicle? There's probably 10 Lariat/FX around and 30 XLTs. And a third of those are probably black.
Old 02-04-2016, 12:18 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
anotherfordguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 244
Received 48 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by missionman
Would love to hear about your "extensive" 5 mile test drives considering most of your arguments are subjective at best. The only accurate thing you stated was the fuel economy.


-who cares about engine sound, v8 vs turbos spooling is subjective
-stone age simple? a 32v 4cam v8 with variable valve timing? oky doky. well at least the 5.0 has powder metal connecting rods (wtf is that anyways?) and a 4 bolt main. the 3.5 has forged rods AND crank, sleeved block as well, oh and a 6 bolt main.
-intercooler damage is laughable and hardly catastrophic if a boost leak is caused. what about radiator punctures?
-assumptive not even subjective opinon, painfully obvious maintenance costs on your extensive drives? so you have experience with both trucks between 100-200k miles ?


sold my 5.0 for the EB, 5.0 was great when not towing or hauling. I had zero issues with it and really enjoyed it. the non-tow/haul MPGs were better as well. 5.0 was brutal to tow heavy with, gear hunting and high RPMs with no low end grunt. not good for the Adirondack and white mountain regions with 8k lbs hooked up out back. Neither truck gave me issues though. I had the 5.0 for 15k miles (4k towing) and the EB for 24k miles (5500towing).


Bottom line with the maintenance is that it is a gamble between both trucks at 100k+, anyone saying otherwise is biased by what they own.
OP already mentioned only towing U-haul sized trailers around, so I'm not sure he'll see much towing beyond 5k as I believe their biggest trailer is a 6' by 12'? Empty weight of one of those is 1920 lbs and max load is supposed to only be 2480 lbs. So we're looking at 4400 lbs here. At this weight the 5.0 is great as I've done this exact load myself with 0 issues. Only dropped down out of 6th on the interstate @ 75 mph if I was going uphill, certainly not an excessive amount of shifting.

While the 5.0 has PM rods, they are not the weak link of these engines. Strength between the two is subjective, because the 5.0 will stand up to more power, but won't handle as much boost. Oil pump will fail before those rods will. To put it in perspective, the 5.8 Trinity in the 2013 GT500 that makes 662HP uses PM rods.

Looking at the power bands between the two engines it should be obvious which one is the better "truck" engine. The EB fills the gap between going from a 150 to a 250 in the towing department. Also towing at any high altitude the EB will obviously have the upper hand, as it'll be in boost while the 5.0 will be flagging due to the lack of air. OP also mentioned being in Houston where this won't really be any issue.
Old 02-04-2016, 12:20 AM
  #18  
F-150 Fanatic
 
blairian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Texas
Posts: 348
Received 58 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spiky
This is what I don't get. Why do you need a Platinum as a student looking to get by with a high mileage vehicle? There's probably 10 Lariat/FX around and 30 XLTs. And a third of those are probably black.
And they would likely be lower mileage for the same price..
Old 02-04-2016, 04:53 AM
  #19  
Master Gunner

Thread Starter
 
Augster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Houston, We Have a Problem
Posts: 1,783
Received 547 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

There have been great feedback here and I appreciate them all.

Originally Posted by Spiky
This is what I don't get. Why do you need a Platinum as a student looking to get by with a high mileage vehicle? There's probably 10 Lariat/FX around and 30 XLTs. And a third of those are probably black.
Although what and why I want a particular vehicle and options is completely irrelevant to my question posed (essentially, high mileage 5.0 vs EB; but heck, why even get an F-150 when there are even cheaper Dodge and Chevy trucks I can get), I don't mind providing some background.

I may be a full time student now, but I'm also a retired Marine and I still have capabilities requirements and a lifestyle that I'm used to. Thus, I can afford many more luxuries than a typical young starving student living away from their parents for the first time.

Heck, if I really wanted to be financially frugal, I should buy some cheap 'beater' car to tide me over for the next 1.5 years. But I would still need a vehicle that can tow when I move back because renting a moving van will cost $2k one way plus $300 for car dolly.

I definitely need load hauling capability now, plus passenger carrying (I'm the designated carpool driver of 4 other classmates since parking is super expensive). I currently have a 2004 Eddie Bauer Expedition 5.4 but it's already at 175,000 and want to replace it ASAP before something catastrophic mechanically occurs, before I drive another 4,000 miles round trip back home for this upcoming summer break.

Luckily, I'm financially capable of getting the vehicle I really want to own now that I can live with for the next 5-7 years. I would prefer the new aluminum F-150s, but those are WAY too expensive for me presently; but I can wait.
Old 02-04-2016, 05:13 AM
  #20  
Master Gunner

Thread Starter
 
Augster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Houston, We Have a Problem
Posts: 1,783
Received 547 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blairian
And they would likely be lower mileage for the same price..
In addition, you and Spiky also didn't notice my sig: I used to own a 5.4 4x4 Platinum. Loved it and miss it. Sold it only because when I retired in 2012 and became a full time student at the time, $5 gasoline and the long commute in Cali was killing me.

But now with gas at a buck-fifty here in Texas, it's no longer a financial burden, especially since I live three blocks away from the medical school.


Quick Reply: Looking to buy pre-owned 100k+ SCrew: 5.0 or EB?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 PM.