Ecoboost vs Diesel?
#21
Senior Member
I have owned several Duramaxs over the years and I bought one with DPF and it was my last diesel truck. The mpg went down from the previous years LBZ (non-DPF) engine by 2 mpg. This the same motor only the DPF was added. I have had (3) 1500 GMC 6.2L gas trucks since, almost same torque ratings as the ecoboost. I have a 2012 ecoboost on order. The big plus with the all aluminum gas engine and lighter transmissions is you lose 500 to 700 lbs. off the front end over a diesel. I would not own a diesel pickup without 4wd and get it off pavement because all brands get stuck easily with all the weight over there front ends. The gas trucks also don't push in curves like a diesel. I tow a trailer about 10% of the time 4K to 7K and have never needed more power. I am not brand loyal. I have owned pickups made by Dodge, Chevy, GMC and Ford over the years. If you constantly run a 9k or bigger trailer you should get a 3/4 ton truck IMO. The 420 ft. lbs. of torque of the ecoboost doesn't match the approximate 700 ft. lbs. of torque of the 3/4 ton diesels or there heavier suspensions.
Last edited by crashcarruthers; 10-19-2011 at 10:49 AM.
#22
I am in a similar situation. I currently tow 8k miles a year. I need(1/2 or 3/4?) a 4x4 crew cab and 6.5 foot bed(with cap, 2.4k generator, 2 folding bikes, folding kayak, dutch oven, stove, propane etc) to tow a 7600lb TT(1070lbs tongue weight). There is alleged up grade in the payload capacity in the 2012 F150s. I would be slightly below the payload threshold of the 2012 F150s. I wish the Ford F250 6.2L engine had more torque. The 2012 Ram 2500 Cummins has the issue with regen with you idle a lot(i.e seating in traffic).
I'm am spoiled with my 2002 Ford F350 SRW 7.3PSD, plenty of torque just not a 4x4. I am doing my research and it will be a tough call. No Ford 6.7 diesel for me, to new and to expensive to repair once the warranty is out. I don't like the old interior of the Chevys.
Any additional ideas or comments?
Mark
I'm am spoiled with my 2002 Ford F350 SRW 7.3PSD, plenty of torque just not a 4x4. I am doing my research and it will be a tough call. No Ford 6.7 diesel for me, to new and to expensive to repair once the warranty is out. I don't like the old interior of the Chevys.
Any additional ideas or comments?
Mark
#23
Originally Posted by crashcarruthers
I have owned several Duramaxs over the years and I bought one with DPF and it was my last diesel truck. The mpg went down from the previous years LMM (non-DPF) engine by 2 mpg. This the same motor only the DPF was added. I have had (3) 1500 GMC 6.2L gas trucks since, almost same torque ratings as the ecoboost. I have a 2012 ecoboost on order. The big plus with the all aluminum gas engine and lighter transmissions is you lose 500 to 700 lbs. off the front end over a diesel. I would not own a diesel pickup without 4wd and get it off pavement because all brands get stuck easily with all the weight over there front ends. The gas trucks also don't push in curves like a diesel. I tow a trailer about 10% of the time 4K to 7K and have never needed more power. I am not brand loyal. I have owned pickups made by Dodge, Chevy, GMC and Ford over the years. If you constantly run a 9k or bigger trailer you should get a 3/4 ton truck IMO. The 420 ft. lbs. of torque of the ecoboost doesn't match the approximate 700 ft. lbs. of torque of the 3/4 ton diesels or there heavier suspensions.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the feedback guys. I appreciate it.
Most diesel guys seem to be pretty happy with it.
I agree that the emissions regulations have really killed the simplicity and fuel efficiency of the diesel.
Power is definitely up though. I test drove a new Duramax and the thing flat out hauls ***.
IMO, UREA, DPF and EGR all seem to be band aid fixes until someone can figure out way to make the engines run cleaner.
Seems like the Ecoboost with direct injection and twin turbos has the gas engines headed in the right direction.
Most diesel guys seem to be pretty happy with it.
I agree that the emissions regulations have really killed the simplicity and fuel efficiency of the diesel.
Power is definitely up though. I test drove a new Duramax and the thing flat out hauls ***.
IMO, UREA, DPF and EGR all seem to be band aid fixes until someone can figure out way to make the engines run cleaner.
Seems like the Ecoboost with direct injection and twin turbos has the gas engines headed in the right direction.
#25
Originally Posted by GlennRMK
Thanks for the feedback guys. I appreciate it.
Most diesel guys seem to be pretty happy with it.
I agree that the emissions regulations have really killed the simplicity and fuel efficiency of the diesel.
Power is definitely up though. I test drove a new Duramax and the thing flat out hauls ***.
IMO, UREA, DPF and EGR all seem to be band aid fixes until someone can figure out way to make the engines run cleaner.
Seems like the Ecoboost with direct injection and twin turbos has the gas engines headed in the right direction.
Most diesel guys seem to be pretty happy with it.
I agree that the emissions regulations have really killed the simplicity and fuel efficiency of the diesel.
Power is definitely up though. I test drove a new Duramax and the thing flat out hauls ***.
IMO, UREA, DPF and EGR all seem to be band aid fixes until someone can figure out way to make the engines run cleaner.
Seems like the Ecoboost with direct injection and twin turbos has the gas engines headed in the right direction.
#26
Senior Member
I am in a similar situation. I currently tow 8k miles a year. I need(1/2 or 3/4?) a 4x4 crew cab and 6.5 foot bed(with cap, 2.4k generator, 2 folding bikes, folding kayak, dutch oven, stove, propane etc) to tow a 7600lb TT(1070lbs tongue weight). There is alleged up grade in the payload capacity in the 2012 F150s. I would be slightly below the payload threshold of the 2012 F150s. I wish the Ford F250 6.2L engine had more torque. The 2012 Ram 2500 Cummins has the issue with regen with you idle a lot(i.e seating in traffic).
I'm am spoiled with my 2002 Ford F350 SRW 7.3PSD, plenty of torque just not a 4x4. I am doing my research and it will be a tough call. No Ford 6.7 diesel for me, to new and to expensive to repair once the warranty is out. I don't like the old interior of the Chevys.
Any additional ideas or comments?
Mark
I'm am spoiled with my 2002 Ford F350 SRW 7.3PSD, plenty of torque just not a 4x4. I am doing my research and it will be a tough call. No Ford 6.7 diesel for me, to new and to expensive to repair once the warranty is out. I don't like the old interior of the Chevys.
Any additional ideas or comments?
Mark
#27
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a look at fuel prices locally, Diesel is still cheaper here. regular gas is $1.10/ liter diesel is $1.07/ liter. Thats still too much for diesel. If diesel is 20-30 cents more / gallon in the US, thats crazy. Diesel is a more raw fuel that doesn't go through as much refining as gasoline and should always be cheaper. Sounds like the powers that be are keeping prices high to discourage people from driving diesels or they don't have enough supply.
#29
Diesel is so weird here. Last month it was .30-.40 cents cheaper. Just looked at the same station yesterday when I filled up and it was .90 cents more then premium. Close to $5.
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well I have a 2011 F150 FX4 SuperCrew 5.5 ft box in oxford white on the way. Local dealer has to retrieve it for me.
Hopefully I made the right decision.
FYI, diesel is 40 cents a gallon more then regular right now in Montana.
Hopefully I made the right decision.
FYI, diesel is 40 cents a gallon more then regular right now in Montana.