Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ecoboost Algebra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 07:41 PM
  #21  
jrbdmb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
Premium fuel is only recommended by Ford when towing heavy in hot conditions.

The incentives do apply to the ecoboost.
At ford.com, in my area (Philly) there are $3500 in rebates for the XLT for above. Fine print:
$500 Customer Cash (PGM #11366) + $1,000 Promotional Bonus Cash (PGM #11866) + $1,000 Ford Credit Bonus Cash (PGM #11862) + $1,000 Trade-In Assistance Bonus Cash (PGM #32352). Trade-In Assistance Bonus Cash available to customers that currently own or lease a 1995 or newer car, truck or SUV who trade in or have a lease expiring by May 31, 2011. Ford Credit Bonus Cash requires Ford Credit financing; not all buyers will qualify. Not available on EcoBoost and Raptor. Residency restrictions apply. For all offers, take new retail delivery from dealer stock by 2/28/2011. See dealer for qualifications and complete details.

Sometimes the Ford site is a day or two late with updates, but it is usually quite accurate, so no EcoBoost rebates for me.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 07:48 PM
  #22  
JGoodish's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
Premium fuel is only recommended by Ford when towing heavy in hot conditions.

The incentives do apply to the ecoboost.

If you want low end torque and the ability to tow up to 11,300 lbs get an ecoboost.

Before ordering a 5.0 I would take a look at the test report on it over at pickuptrucks.com. The mpg wasn't so hot. Sounds like the 5.4. Yeah I know its got more power, but Ford says that 70% of it's customers want better mpg- and the 5.0 doesn't provide it.............. I bet that the ecoboost will beat the 5.0 easily.
You better check again on the incentives relative to the EcoBoost. As of today, the Ford incentives site specifically excludes the EcoBoost (and Raptor), but that wasn't the case a week or two ago.

The fuel economy numbers from the review are really hazy. It sounds as though they were mostly city miles with a heavy foot, and in that case they're about on par with or better than the EPA estimate of 14 for the 5.0. It was also unclear whether these numbers were hand calculations or computer estimates. When reading the review, I had the feeling that the reviewer(s) didn't spend much time evaluating unloaded fuel economy.

If you think the EcoBoost is going to be appreciably better, I have a feeling that you're going to be disappointed. The EPA estimate is only an average of 1mpg better than the 5.0, and my own observations with an EcoBoost Scab recently appeared to be in-line with those numbers. It would be great to get 19-20mpg combined with the EcoBoost, but the EPA estimate isn't anywhere close to that high.


JKG
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 07:49 PM
  #23  
Ford850's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 386
Default

Originally Posted by JGoodish
The 5.0 will drink more, but so far it appears not much more. I suspect that the EcoBoost will do better when the truck is not moving (i.e. warmup, idling, etc.) because a 5.0L V8 engine is obviously going to require more fuel. I'm guessing that the EcoBoost will require more fuel flow to keep the truck moving (as is typical with turbocharged engines), but its much smaller displacement + DI still nets an advantage in fuel economy, but it appears to be only a slight advantage. It will be interesting to see what post break-in mileage is like from these engines.

The "recommended for best performance" is just that--a recommendation for best performance. For most folks, I doubt the performance difference would be noticeable, and no harm will come to the engine by using the minimum required octane, so I see the recommendation as a non-issue really.


JKG
I understand the fuel grade part. I was really trying to point out a never ending myth that keeps resurfacing that the 3.5 should have premium fuel. It can use it sure, as any engine can, but it does not need it.
Regarding the fuel consumption of the two, I thought the same as you thinking of the typical turbo. However one of the Ford engineer chats recently really made it sound as if this new 3.5 will perform much more efficiently even though it uses the turbos more than older turbo engines. Maybe Johndeerefarmer saw that chat too?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 08:16 PM
  #24  
rogueknight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
Default

Gas prices are expected to rise all year.
Truck sales will be a concern so better incentives the longer the fuel prices are higher.
I plan to wait til this fall to get my truck
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 09:21 PM
  #25  
Tr1jr2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

The incentives apply to the ecoboost, believe it, just ordered a KR

1000 trade in
1000 ford credit/financing
1000 auto show
500 dealer/ford

That's what I got in incentives for my Eco (3500 dollars) this deal was done last week in Pa.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #26  
stalldad's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

I also recieved 3500 in rebates and incentives on an EcoBoost last week.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #27  
JGoodish's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tr1jr2
The incentives apply to the ecoboost, believe it, just ordered a KR

1000 trade in
1000 ford credit/financing
1000 auto show
500 dealer/ford

That's what I got in incentives for my Eco (3500 dollars) this deal was done last week in Pa.
From my understanding, in the US at least, incentives only apply at time of delivery, not time of order. You might want to visit Ford's site and verify that the EcoBoost is not excluded for your area. In my area (western PA), the EcoBoost now appears to be excluded from the incentives.

Of course, if you just placed an order, you'll be into March at least before delivery, so the incentives (and exclusions, if any) could have changed again by then.


JKG

Last edited by JGoodish; Feb 9, 2011 at 10:03 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 10:02 PM
  #28  
Neutruk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

(deleted)

Last edited by Neutruk; Jul 15, 2011 at 04:38 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 11:30 PM
  #29  
oldphart's Avatar
oldphart
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 70
Likes: 4
From: West Central Florida Coast
Default Locally here in central Florida........

I just received $4500 in rebates on my new 2011XLT Screw w/ 3.7 engine., and the 3.73 rear ....... and that engine runs like a top, very quiet, responsive, and with just 689 miles so far, computor onboard shows 20.0 MPG in mainly rural driving, little hiway time, and the first tank fill showed about 20.5 MPG ......... It is by far the most comfortable F-150 I have ever owned and I have been driving Fords since the F-1 as my first, the F-100's, and the F-150's........ I also noted here that there was a $1,750 additional charge to get the EB engine ! and they DO RECOMMEND 89 or 91 octane fuel for best performance here. All-in-all, the 3.7 will do the job!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 11:46 PM
  #30  
1meanZ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

I ordered my EB F150 Jan 29. At the time of the order rebates were $3500. Feb 7 the rebates were $0. Order cancelled Feb 7. I understand a lot can happen by the time the truck arrives at the end of March but I wasn't willing to take that chance. You guys that ordered recently might want to call your dealer and double check.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.