Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dissapointed with payload capacity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2014, 06:02 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 543
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

I found this?
Attached Thumbnails Dissapointed with payload capacity-image-1963499976.jpg  
Old 02-16-2014, 06:06 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
BobLobLaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,770
Received 242 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OMAC
I found this?
That would be for a stripped down reg cab long box with the heavy duty payload package. Notice it says "when properly equipped." Yours is equipped for a 1500 lb payload rating.
Old 02-16-2014, 06:08 PM
  #13  
Member
 
Hwm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Woodlands, TX
Posts: 96
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

The 3100lb rating can only be had with a regular cab long bed truck.
Old 02-16-2014, 06:22 PM
  #14  
Proudly Rockin the XL!
 
nagata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 438
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Considering how much these trucks weigh to begin with, I think it's fairly impressive that they can still be loaded with 1500 lbs or more! My '13 XLT SCab 2WD is rated for just over 1800 lbs; think about how much extra cab weight your SCrew has, and if you have 4WD, that's another couple hundred pounds. Every pound of equipment reduces the payload capacity.

I know certain F-150 configurations are only rated for payload in the 1000-1200 lb. range...THAT would be pretty brutal to deal with when trying to haul anything of significance!

As others have referenced, a F-150 with a rated payload of 3100 lbs has to be VERY rare, as I can't imagine many stripped down XLs (regular cab, 2WD, long bed) were ordered with max payload package. Maybe some commercial buyers, but very few (if any) retail. Everyone wants space and amenities!
Old 02-16-2014, 06:52 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
A7B2FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 205
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OMAC
I found this?
Another heads up. The 11,300 tow rating doesn't apply to your truck.
Old 02-16-2014, 06:53 PM
  #16  
Member
 
fastbydrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 36
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't know any 150, 1500 that could handle 3000 lbs in the bed. The aren't designed to carry that much weight in the bed. You need a 250 or 350 I would think.
Old 02-16-2014, 06:55 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 543
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by A7B2FX4
Another heads up. The 11,300 tow rating doesn't apply to your truck.
That I knew, I found out after there were all there's package add ons, max tow etc, oh well live and learn, now I know and In 4 yrs I'll get the fx4 or similar model outfitted the way I want
Old 02-16-2014, 07:02 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Stumpknocker27's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Your opinion was voided with me when I read that you have an ecoboost and "miss the 350 v8 power from your 98 gmc. " unless it was built up with aftermarket goodies, I don't see how it would even scratch the surface of being as powerful as our 5.0, much less as torquey as the ecoboost.
The following 3 users liked this post by Stumpknocker27:
Left Plate (02-17-2014), lewis26 (02-17-2014), Pitch Black (02-17-2014)
Old 02-16-2014, 07:05 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stumpknocker27
Your opinion was voided with me when I read that you have an ecoboost and "miss the 350 v8 power from your 98 gmc. " unless it was built up with aftermarket goodies, I don't see how it would even scratch the surface of being as powerful as our 5.0, much less as torquey as the ecoboost.
Lol. Yea I've driven tons of old 350s. They didn't have much power stock in comparison to today. But they sure were reliable.
Old 02-16-2014, 07:13 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
A7B2FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 205
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OMAC
That I knew, I found out after there were all there's package add ons, max tow etc, oh well live and learn, now I know and In 4 yrs I'll get the fx4 or similar model outfitted the way I want
One thing not mentioned is using a cargo flatbed trailer. Plenty of single axle trailers out there with a 3500# single axle. That way you dont destroy your truck during the lease and you can always keep the trailer for the next truck. Most times it's better to drag the load rather than haul it.
The following users liked this post:
OMAC (02-16-2014)


Quick Reply: Dissapointed with payload capacity



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.