Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0s suck!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2014, 03:49 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Bennyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 450
Received 97 Likes on 60 Posts
Default 5.0s suck!

Figured that title would get some attention, haha.

Yesterday, went to fill my truck up and my (small) town had somehow ran out of premium fuel. I filled up with 87 and pulled over and removed my MPT 93 Performance tune. Man, what a turd! The gas pedal is very unresponsive, the transmission seems slow and dumb, and the engine revs so slowly, making basically no power under 3-3500rpm. And as if to rub salt in the wound, my mpg this tank is only 13.1 so far, about 2mpg less than normal. Ugh.

Now, this isn't a really a knock against the 5.0. More of just a shout out for the MPT guys. Their tune is absolutely great. I'm now waiting on their 87 octane tune to be emailed to me and it can't get here quick enough.

So, for anyone driving a stock tuned 5.0, you're cheating yourself. Check out MPT. You may be happy with it now, but it's only because you don't know what's it's capable of!

Last edited by Bennyboy; 04-12-2014 at 04:10 PM.
Old 04-12-2014, 03:52 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
nihilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

agreed, stock 5.0 may look good on a dyno but that power is useless with the factory shift strategy. 89 MPT tune and loving it!
Old 04-12-2014, 03:58 PM
  #3  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

5.0s suck!-forumrunner_20140307_154615.jpg
The following 4 users liked this post by my67falcon:
130428 (04-13-2014), Ftruck150 (04-12-2014), jedeckert1984 (04-12-2014), LyteFly (04-13-2014)
Old 04-12-2014, 04:10 PM
  #4  
Unofficial Glass Guru
 
Commander316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raceland, LA
Posts: 1,664
Received 69 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

what gearing do you have?

i noticed a huge difference when i went from 3.31 to 3.73
Old 04-12-2014, 04:14 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Bennyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 450
Received 97 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Commander316
what gearing do you have?

i noticed a huge difference when i went from 3.31 to 3.73
3.55s. Been considering getting 4.10s installed.
Old 04-12-2014, 04:20 PM
  #6  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

Mine has plenty of get up and go, even with 8k behind it. The 5.0l is far superior in the power department to the motor it replaced and does its job very well.
The following users liked this post:
fiveholematt (04-12-2014)
Old 04-12-2014, 04:25 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Bennyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 450
Received 97 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by my67falcon
Mine has plenty of get up and go, even with 8k behind it. The 5.0l is far superior in the power department to the motor it replaced and does its job very well.
Oh, by all means, the 5.0 is head and shoulders of the 5.4 and a very competitive offering, especially considering it's displacement. It's just that mine's been tuned since it had 1,000 miles on the odometer, I now have 14k. I didn't remember how it was in stock form. While it's good, it's just nothing like it is with a good tune. Much of it being the transmission, not the engine itself.

The title was just to draw attention, nothing more.
Old 04-12-2014, 04:36 PM
  #8  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

No, the 5.0l replaced the 4.6l.
Old 04-12-2014, 05:22 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
F-250,LD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 504
Received 52 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

My 98 5.4L had half the power (when new), so I'm very happy with my 5.0L.
Old 04-12-2014, 05:25 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
ymeski56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach Calimexifornia
Posts: 58,557
Received 1,162 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bennyboy
Figured that title would get some attention, haha.
Pfft! I drive a 5.0 that's older than you are!





(Ok...Running 15BTDC base time/ ignition system upgrade/ 170 T-stat/ Side gap copper core plugs, so not "exactly" stock either)

Last edited by ymeski56; 04-12-2014 at 05:39 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Snowflake (04-12-2014)


Quick Reply: 5.0s suck!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.